Lotus Vale
Played in 464 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
3.7% Naya
All commanders (7)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 1.86 · 1.7% (73 of 4,281 decks)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 1.40 · 1.2% (43 of 3,667 decks)
- Johan relevance 1.15 · 4.2% (6 of 143 decks)
- Hazezon Tamar relevance 0.58 · 1.1% (4 of 365 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh relevance 0.27 · 1.3% (1 of 76 decks)
- Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant relevance 0.25 · 1.1% (1 of 89 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.24 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.35 · 46.6% (216 of 464 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.26 · 48.5% (225 of 464 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.19 · 46.1% (214 of 464 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.18 · 47.6% (221 of 464 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.14 · 29.7% (138 of 464 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.13 · 33.0% (153 of 464 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.03 · 37.9% (176 of 464 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.03 · 32.1% (149 of 464 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.01 · 28.0% (130 of 464 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.95 · 24.6% (114 of 464 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.95 · 42.5% (197 of 464 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.85 · 29.1% (135 of 464 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.85 · 29.1% (135 of 464 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.84 · 31.9% (148 of 464 decks)
- Candelabra of Tawnos relevance 0.84 · 16.6% (77 of 464 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.83 · 26.5% (123 of 464 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.81 · 28.2% (131 of 464 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.80 · 21.6% (100 of 464 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.79 · 19.0% (88 of 464 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.79 · 19.2% (89 of 464 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.78 · 23.9% (111 of 464 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.77 · 23.3% (108 of 464 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.76 · 29.1% (135 of 464 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.74 · 20.5% (95 of 464 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 0.73 · 22.6% (105 of 464 decks)
- Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 0.73 · 28.4% (132 of 464 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.71 · 16.8% (78 of 464 decks)
- Brightglass Gearhulk relevance 0.71 · 21.3% (99 of 464 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.70 · 24.4% (113 of 464 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 0.70 · 18.8% (87 of 464 decks)
All creatures (16)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.35 · 46.6% (216 of 464 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.19 · 46.1% (214 of 464 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.03 · 37.9% (176 of 464 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.03 · 32.1% (149 of 464 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.01 · 28.0% (130 of 464 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.95 · 42.5% (197 of 464 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.85 · 29.1% (135 of 464 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.84 · 31.9% (148 of 464 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.79 · 19.2% (89 of 464 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.78 · 23.9% (111 of 464 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.76 · 29.1% (135 of 464 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 0.73 · 22.6% (105 of 464 decks)
- Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 0.73 · 28.4% (132 of 464 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.71 · 16.8% (78 of 464 decks)
- Brightglass Gearhulk relevance 0.71 · 21.3% (99 of 464 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.70 · 24.4% (113 of 464 decks)
All artifacts (8)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.26 · 48.5% (225 of 464 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.13 · 33.0% (153 of 464 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.95 · 24.6% (114 of 464 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.85 · 29.1% (135 of 464 decks)
- Candelabra of Tawnos relevance 0.84 · 16.6% (77 of 464 decks)
- Ichor Wellspring relevance 0.81 · 28.2% (131 of 464 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.80 · 21.6% (100 of 464 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.74 · 20.5% (95 of 464 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Exploration relevance 0.83 · 26.5% (123 of 464 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.77 · 23.3% (108 of 464 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 0.70 · 18.8% (87 of 464 decks)
All instants (2)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.18 · 47.6% (221 of 464 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.79 · 19.0% (88 of 464 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.14 · 29.7% (138 of 464 decks)
All utility lands (15)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.99 · 33.6% (156 of 464 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.90 · 51.3% (238 of 464 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.86 · 23.5% (109 of 464 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 0.83 · 24.4% (113 of 464 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 0.82 · 23.9% (111 of 464 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.82 · 24.8% (115 of 464 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.82 · 24.1% (112 of 464 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.81 · 21.1% (98 of 464 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 0.81 · 23.9% (111 of 464 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 0.80 · 23.5% (109 of 464 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.77 · 30.8% (143 of 464 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 0.77 · 22.2% (103 of 464 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.77 · 22.0% (102 of 464 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 0.76 · 22.4% (104 of 464 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 0.71 · 20.5% (95 of 464 decks)
All lands (5)
- Lotus Field relevance 2.54 · 75.0% (348 of 464 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.96 · 23.9% (111 of 464 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 0.76 · 23.9% (111 of 464 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 0.75 · 23.7% (110 of 464 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.74 · 23.5% (109 of 464 decks)
EDH data for Lotus Vale: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 464 real decks.