Circle of Dreams Druid
Played in 4,624 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
5.5% Simic
All commanders (30)
- Thranduil the Strategist relevance 3.32 · 36.0% (434 of 1,207 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 2.68 · 27.7% (208 of 750 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 1.84 · 8.5% (404 of 4,733 decks)
- Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy relevance 1.75 · 6.2% (852 of 13,707 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 1.69 · 7.9% (303 of 3,813 decks)
- Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 1.67 · 9.7% (168 of 1,731 decks)
- Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 1.54 · 8.8% (140 of 1,590 decks)
- Tishana, Voice of Thunder relevance 1.53 · 15.2% (45 of 296 decks)
- Momir Vig, Simic Visionary relevance 1.39 · 8.6% (92 of 1,074 decks)
- Galadriel, Elven-Queen relevance 1.36 · 6.9% (137 of 1,973 decks)
- Erestor of the Council relevance 1.31 · 12.2% (36 of 296 decks)
- Legolas, Counter of Kills relevance 1.21 · 12.7% (26 of 205 decks)
- Volo, Guide to Monsters relevance 1.16 · 4.4% (236 of 5,386 decks)
- Jackal, Genius Geneticist relevance 1.00 · 5.6% (57 of 1,016 decks)
- Ezuri, Claw of Progress relevance 0.93 · 3.7% (127 of 3,469 decks)
- Lonis, Cryptozoologist relevance 0.86 · 3.7% (89 of 2,402 decks)
- Elrond of the White Council relevance 0.83 · 6.9% (19 of 274 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.80 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Sita Varma, Masked Racer relevance 0.68 · 6.5% (12 of 185 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.67 · 50.0% (2 of 4 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 0.63 · 2.9% (46 of 1,577 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.61 · 4.7% (15 of 321 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.61 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Galadriel of Lothlórien relevance 0.60 · 2.5% (61 of 2,480 decks)
- Gandalf, Westward Voyager relevance 0.60 · 3.6% (23 of 635 decks)
- Elrond, Master of Healing relevance 0.60 · 3.1% (33 of 1,077 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.59 · 2.2% (70 of 3,125 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.55 · 15.0% (3 of 20 decks)
- The Astonishing Ant-Man relevance 0.55 · 2.0% (70 of 3,440 decks)
- Arwen Undómiel relevance 0.52 · 3.6% (15 of 416 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.23 · 39.9% (1,847 of 4,624 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.95 · 46.7% (2,160 of 4,624 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.90 · 59.9% (2,770 of 4,624 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.89 · 22.6% (1,044 of 4,624 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.88 · 33.0% (1,525 of 4,624 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.86 · 38.0% (1,758 of 4,624 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.85 · 27.8% (1,286 of 4,624 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.80 · 62.8% (2,902 of 4,624 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.74 · 16.3% (752 of 4,624 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.73 · 24.4% (1,127 of 4,624 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.69 · 14.9% (688 of 4,624 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.69 · 21.3% (983 of 4,624 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.68 · 52.2% (2,415 of 4,624 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.67 · 20.4% (944 of 4,624 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.67 · 22.3% (1,029 of 4,624 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.66 · 17.7% (818 of 4,624 decks)
- Enduring Vitality relevance 0.66 · 26.5% (1,225 of 4,624 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.66 · 22.2% (1,026 of 4,624 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.64 · 13.4% (621 of 4,624 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.64 · 22.8% (1,056 of 4,624 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.62 · 21.1% (974 of 4,624 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.61 · 28.8% (1,332 of 4,624 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.61 · 26.2% (1,211 of 4,624 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.61 · 30.1% (1,393 of 4,624 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.60 · 24.2% (1,117 of 4,624 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.60 · 28.6% (1,323 of 4,624 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.59 · 22.8% (1,056 of 4,624 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.59 · 13.8% (638 of 4,624 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.59 · 46.9% (2,168 of 4,624 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.58 · 13.0% (599 of 4,624 decks)
All creatures (30)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.23 · 39.9% (1,847 of 4,624 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.95 · 46.7% (2,160 of 4,624 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.90 · 59.9% (2,770 of 4,624 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.89 · 22.6% (1,044 of 4,624 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.88 · 33.0% (1,525 of 4,624 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.86 · 38.0% (1,758 of 4,624 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.85 · 27.8% (1,286 of 4,624 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.80 · 62.8% (2,902 of 4,624 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.74 · 16.3% (752 of 4,624 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.73 · 24.4% (1,127 of 4,624 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.69 · 14.9% (688 of 4,624 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.68 · 52.2% (2,415 of 4,624 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.67 · 20.4% (944 of 4,624 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.67 · 22.3% (1,029 of 4,624 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.66 · 17.7% (818 of 4,624 decks)
- Enduring Vitality relevance 0.66 · 26.5% (1,225 of 4,624 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.66 · 22.2% (1,026 of 4,624 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.64 · 13.4% (621 of 4,624 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.64 · 22.8% (1,056 of 4,624 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.61 · 28.8% (1,332 of 4,624 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.61 · 26.2% (1,211 of 4,624 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.59 · 22.8% (1,056 of 4,624 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.59 · 13.8% (638 of 4,624 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.58 · 13.0% (599 of 4,624 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.58 · 31.0% (1,432 of 4,624 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.57 · 16.6% (769 of 4,624 decks)
- Shang-Chi, Master of Kung Fu relevance 0.56 · 13.3% (614 of 4,624 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.56 · 21.5% (993 of 4,624 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.53 · 18.3% (847 of 4,624 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.51 · 17.8% (824 of 4,624 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.69 · 21.3% (983 of 4,624 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.62 · 21.1% (974 of 4,624 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.50 · 22.8% (1,056 of 4,624 decks)
All instants (5)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.61 · 30.1% (1,393 of 4,624 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.59 · 46.9% (2,168 of 4,624 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.56 · 34.1% (1,577 of 4,624 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.52 · 18.0% (832 of 4,624 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.51 · 27.0% (1,247 of 4,624 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.60 · 24.2% (1,117 of 4,624 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.60 · 28.6% (1,323 of 4,624 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.57 · 36.5% (1,688 of 4,624 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.55 · 31.5% (1,458 of 4,624 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.51 · 29.8% (1,380 of 4,624 decks)
All lands (7)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.65 · 23.5% (1,088 of 4,624 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.62 · 20.2% (933 of 4,624 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.59 · 47.0% (2,172 of 4,624 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.55 · 32.0% (1,481 of 4,624 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.54 · 27.6% (1,277 of 4,624 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.51 · 22.2% (1,028 of 4,624 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.50 · 20.5% (949 of 4,624 decks)
EDH data for Circle of Dreams Druid: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 4,624 real decks.