Shield Broker
Played in 648 Blue decks
3030+37+4+3+4+1+1+
Color Identity Spread
9.0% Blue
Commanders
Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor 46.6% of decks
Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor 46.6% of decks
Thassa, Deep-Dwelling 14.6% of decks
Thassa, Deep-Dwelling 14.6% of decks
Y'shtola Rhul 5.1% of decks
Y'shtola Rhul 5.1% of decks
Meneldor, Swift Savior 19.1% of decks
Meneldor, Swift Savior 19.1% of decks
Orvar, the All-Form 1.2% of decks
Orvar, the All-Form 1.2% of decks
Wiccan, Rising Magician 5.0% of decks
Wiccan, Rising Magician 5.0% of decks
Most Relevant
Agent of Treachery 38.7% of decks
Agent of Treachery 38.7% of decks
Mind Flayer 25.5% of decks
Mind Flayer 25.5% of decks
Callous Oppressor 19.0% of decks
Callous Oppressor 19.0% of decks
Aether Channeler 34.4% of decks
Aether Channeler 34.4% of decks
Watcher for Tomorrow 17.1% of decks
Watcher for Tomorrow 17.1% of decks
Cephalid Looter 12.5% of decks
Cephalid Looter 12.5% of decks
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator
0.29| 1.1%
$31.71 · €30.91$0.29 · €0.28
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 3.97 · 46.6% (76 of 163 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 3.26 · 14.6% (106 of 728 decks)
- Y'shtola Rhul relevance 2.19 · 5.1% (73 of 1,435 decks)
- Meneldor, Swift Savior relevance 1.72 · 19.1% (9 of 47 decks)
- Orvar, the All-Form relevance 1.21 · 1.2% (79 of 6,415 decks)
- Wiccan, Rising Magician relevance 1.11 · 5.0% (8 of 159 decks)
- Goldberry, River-Daughter relevance 0.93 · 3.1% (8 of 257 decks)
- Lulu, Stern Guardian relevance 0.86 · 1.7% (13 of 766 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Wave Warrior relevance 0.77 · 6.5% (3 of 46 decks)
- Kira, Great Glass-Spinner relevance 0.71 · 2.6% (5 of 192 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.70 · 1.1% (13 of 1,138 decks)
- Echo, Perceptive Prodigy relevance 0.70 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Rikku, Resourceful Guardian relevance 0.68 · 2.0% (6 of 305 decks)
- Kitsune, Dragon's Daughter relevance 0.67 · 1.7% (7 of 422 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.65 · 2.8% (4 of 144 decks)
- Empress Galina relevance 0.56 · 1.3% (6 of 449 decks)
- Elrond, Moon-Reader relevance 0.50 · 1.3% (5 of 393 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.50 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Keiga, the Tide Star relevance 0.47 · 1.4% (4 of 291 decks)
- Mondo Gecko relevance 0.44 · 1.2% (4 of 335 decks)
- Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg relevance 0.39 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Master Pakku relevance 0.38 · 1.9% (2 of 103 decks)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 0.36 · 1.7% (2 of 118 decks)
- Barrin, Master Wizard relevance 0.35 · 1.7% (2 of 121 decks)
- Madame Web, Clairvoyant relevance 0.32 · 4.0% (1 of 25 decks)
- Bilbo Baggins, Burglar // Take a Glance relevance 0.32 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Hapatra, the Desert Frost relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 0.29 · 1.1% (2 of 181 decks)
- Heidar, Rimewind Master relevance 0.23 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
- Kopala, Warden of Waves relevance 0.22 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 1.24 · 38.7% (251 of 648 decks)
- Mind Flayer relevance 1.10 · 25.5% (165 of 648 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 1.05 · 19.0% (123 of 648 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 1.03 · 34.4% (223 of 648 decks)
- Watcher for Tomorrow relevance 0.81 · 17.1% (111 of 648 decks)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 0.78 · 12.5% (81 of 648 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 0.78 · 20.2% (131 of 648 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.78 · 23.9% (155 of 648 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.78 · 30.2% (196 of 648 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.77 · 25.0% (162 of 648 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.77 · 27.3% (177 of 648 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.76 · 22.1% (143 of 648 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.74 · 20.8% (135 of 648 decks)
- Circuit Mender relevance 0.74 · 15.6% (101 of 648 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.73 · 24.8% (161 of 648 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.72 · 39.7% (257 of 648 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.71 · 30.1% (195 of 648 decks)
- Sea Gate Oracle relevance 0.71 · 15.4% (100 of 648 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 0.71 · 12.2% (79 of 648 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 0.69 · 10.3% (67 of 648 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.67 · 13.7% (89 of 648 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 0.66 · 13.4% (87 of 648 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.65 · 15.1% (98 of 648 decks)
- Anticausal Vestige relevance 0.64 · 14.5% (94 of 648 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.64 · 15.7% (102 of 648 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.64 · 12.0% (78 of 648 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.63 · 28.7% (186 of 648 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 0.63 · 13.1% (85 of 648 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 0.60 · 15.3% (99 of 648 decks)
- Ray of Command relevance 0.59 · 10.2% (66 of 648 decks)
All creatures (37)
- Agent of Treachery relevance 1.24 · 38.7% (251 of 648 decks)
- Mind Flayer relevance 1.10 · 25.5% (165 of 648 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 1.05 · 19.0% (123 of 648 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 1.03 · 34.4% (223 of 648 decks)
- Watcher for Tomorrow relevance 0.81 · 17.1% (111 of 648 decks)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 0.78 · 12.5% (81 of 648 decks)
- Sower of Temptation relevance 0.78 · 20.2% (131 of 648 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.78 · 30.2% (196 of 648 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.77 · 27.3% (177 of 648 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.76 · 22.1% (143 of 648 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.74 · 20.8% (135 of 648 decks)
- Circuit Mender relevance 0.74 · 15.6% (101 of 648 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.73 · 24.8% (161 of 648 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.72 · 39.7% (257 of 648 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.71 · 30.1% (195 of 648 decks)
- Sea Gate Oracle relevance 0.71 · 15.4% (100 of 648 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 0.71 · 12.2% (79 of 648 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 0.69 · 10.3% (67 of 648 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.67 · 13.7% (89 of 648 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 0.66 · 13.4% (87 of 648 decks)
- Anticausal Vestige relevance 0.64 · 14.5% (94 of 648 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 0.64 · 12.0% (78 of 648 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 0.63 · 13.1% (85 of 648 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 0.60 · 15.3% (99 of 648 decks)
- Jill, Shiva's Dominant // Shiva, Warden of Ice relevance 0.59 · 13.7% (89 of 648 decks)
- Master Thief relevance 0.59 · 9.3% (60 of 648 decks)
- Barrin, Tolarian Archmage relevance 0.58 · 14.4% (93 of 648 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.56 · 27.3% (177 of 648 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 0.56 · 9.9% (64 of 648 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 0.55 · 9.0% (58 of 648 decks)
- Sludge Monster relevance 0.55 · 10.2% (66 of 648 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.52 · 15.3% (99 of 648 decks)
- Overtaker relevance 0.51 · 7.6% (49 of 648 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.50 · 15.6% (101 of 648 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.48 · 10.6% (69 of 648 decks)
- Fblthp, the Lost relevance 0.46 · 9.9% (64 of 648 decks)
- Astral Dragon relevance 0.46 · 11.4% (74 of 648 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.78 · 23.9% (155 of 648 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.77 · 25.0% (162 of 648 decks)
- Vedalken Shackles relevance 0.49 · 12.7% (82 of 648 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.45 · 14.7% (95 of 648 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.65 · 15.1% (98 of 648 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.64 · 15.7% (102 of 648 decks)
- Chamber of Manipulation relevance 0.52 · 9.0% (58 of 648 decks)
All instants (4)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.63 · 28.7% (186 of 648 decks)
- Ray of Command relevance 0.59 · 10.2% (66 of 648 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.57 · 17.4% (113 of 648 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.51 · 21.0% (136 of 648 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 0.49 · 8.3% (54 of 648 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.47 · 17.3% (112 of 648 decks)
EDH data for Shield Broker: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 648 real decks.





















































