Floral Evoker
Played in 280 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
2.1% Gruul
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (9)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 2.12 · 1.6% (86 of 5,503 decks)
- Rydia, Summoner of Mist relevance 1.80 · 2.6% (23 of 874 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.22 · 1.6% (12 of 763 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.91 · 1.1% (8 of 725 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.85 · 8.3% (2 of 24 decks)
- The Lady of Otaria relevance 0.66 · 1.1% (4 of 367 decks)
- Rhino, Barreling Brute relevance 0.48 · 1.3% (2 of 155 decks)
- Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.47 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Guild Artisan relevance 0.31 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Sabotender relevance 1.47 · 48.2% (135 of 280 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 1.46 · 31.4% (88 of 280 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 1.33 · 33.2% (93 of 280 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.29 · 46.1% (129 of 280 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 1.22 · 26.8% (75 of 280 decks)
- Spitfire Lagac relevance 1.21 · 33.6% (94 of 280 decks)
- Tunneling Geopede relevance 1.13 · 31.1% (87 of 280 decks)
- Eumidian Terrabotanist relevance 1.11 · 21.1% (59 of 280 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.07 · 37.5% (105 of 280 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 1.06 · 23.9% (67 of 280 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 1.06 · 26.4% (74 of 280 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 1.06 · 29.3% (82 of 280 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.04 · 33.9% (95 of 280 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.03 · 37.1% (104 of 280 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.03 · 45.4% (127 of 280 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.02 · 31.8% (89 of 280 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.99 · 22.1% (62 of 280 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.92 · 30.0% (84 of 280 decks)
- Zell Dincht relevance 0.91 · 23.6% (66 of 280 decks)
- Gladiolus Amicitia relevance 0.91 · 23.2% (65 of 280 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.90 · 39.6% (111 of 280 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.88 · 28.6% (80 of 280 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.88 · 20.0% (56 of 280 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.87 · 28.2% (79 of 280 decks)
- Jaddi Offshoot relevance 0.86 · 15.7% (44 of 280 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.85 · 21.1% (59 of 280 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.85 · 37.5% (105 of 280 decks)
- Cosi's Ravager relevance 0.85 · 14.6% (41 of 280 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.83 · 36.4% (102 of 280 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.83 · 18.6% (52 of 280 decks)
All creatures (33)
- Sabotender relevance 1.47 · 48.2% (135 of 280 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 1.46 · 31.4% (88 of 280 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.29 · 46.1% (129 of 280 decks)
- Spitfire Lagac relevance 1.21 · 33.6% (94 of 280 decks)
- Tunneling Geopede relevance 1.13 · 31.1% (87 of 280 decks)
- Eumidian Terrabotanist relevance 1.11 · 21.1% (59 of 280 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.07 · 37.5% (105 of 280 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 1.06 · 26.4% (74 of 280 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 1.06 · 29.3% (82 of 280 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.04 · 33.9% (95 of 280 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.03 · 37.1% (104 of 280 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.03 · 45.4% (127 of 280 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.02 · 31.8% (89 of 280 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.92 · 30.0% (84 of 280 decks)
- Zell Dincht relevance 0.91 · 23.6% (66 of 280 decks)
- Gladiolus Amicitia relevance 0.91 · 23.2% (65 of 280 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.88 · 28.6% (80 of 280 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.88 · 20.0% (56 of 280 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.87 · 28.2% (79 of 280 decks)
- Jaddi Offshoot relevance 0.86 · 15.7% (44 of 280 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.85 · 37.5% (105 of 280 decks)
- Cosi's Ravager relevance 0.85 · 14.6% (41 of 280 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.83 · 36.4% (102 of 280 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.82 · 26.8% (75 of 280 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.82 · 27.9% (78 of 280 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 0.82 · 18.6% (52 of 280 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.81 · 30.4% (85 of 280 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.80 · 27.1% (76 of 280 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.79 · 24.3% (68 of 280 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.78 · 27.5% (77 of 280 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.78 · 34.6% (97 of 280 decks)
- Seedship Agrarian relevance 0.76 · 14.3% (40 of 280 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.76 · 21.1% (59 of 280 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 1.22 · 26.8% (75 of 280 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.77 · 23.9% (67 of 280 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Druid Class relevance 1.33 · 33.2% (93 of 280 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 1.06 · 23.9% (67 of 280 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.99 · 22.1% (62 of 280 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.85 · 21.1% (59 of 280 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.83 · 18.6% (52 of 280 decks)
All instants (2)
- Harrow relevance 0.90 · 39.6% (111 of 280 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.77 · 25.0% (70 of 280 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.78 · 23.6% (66 of 280 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.74 · 21.1% (59 of 280 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.74 · 34.6% (97 of 280 decks)
All lands (5)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.90 · 50.0% (140 of 280 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.89 · 58.2% (163 of 280 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.81 · 24.6% (69 of 280 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.78 · 23.2% (65 of 280 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.77 · 40.7% (114 of 280 decks)
EDH data for Floral Evoker: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 280 real decks.