Scaled Herbalist
Played in 192 Naya decks
230+24+4+3+4+12+3+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Llanowar Scout 15.6% of decks
Llanowar Scout 15.6% of decks
Explore 32.8% of decks
Explore 32.8% of decks
Druid Class 18.2% of decks
Druid Class 18.2% of decks
Skyshroud Ranger 12.5% of decks
Skyshroud Ranger 12.5% of decks
Springbloom Druid 18.8% of decks
Springbloom Druid 18.8% of decks
Murasa Rootgrazer 13.0% of decks
Murasa Rootgrazer 13.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Minsc, Beloved Ranger relevance 1.31 · 1.5% (9 of 606 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.57 · 1.1% (2 of 181 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 1.01 · 15.6% (30 of 192 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.90 · 32.8% (63 of 192 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.81 · 18.2% (35 of 192 decks)
- Skyshroud Ranger relevance 0.78 · 12.5% (24 of 192 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.68 · 18.8% (36 of 192 decks)
- Murasa Rootgrazer relevance 0.68 · 13.0% (25 of 192 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.66 · 25.0% (48 of 192 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.65 · 16.7% (32 of 192 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.65 · 18.2% (35 of 192 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.64 · 10.4% (20 of 192 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.62 · 9.9% (19 of 192 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.59 · 15.6% (30 of 192 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.58 · 17.7% (34 of 192 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.56 · 18.2% (35 of 192 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.56 · 24.0% (46 of 192 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.55 · 18.2% (35 of 192 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.54 · 10.4% (20 of 192 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.53 · 16.1% (31 of 192 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.53 · 15.1% (29 of 192 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.51 · 12.5% (24 of 192 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.50 · 15.1% (29 of 192 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.50 · 15.6% (30 of 192 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.50 · 17.7% (34 of 192 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.49 · 16.1% (31 of 192 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.48 · 11.5% (22 of 192 decks)
- Bitter Work relevance 0.48 · 15.6% (30 of 192 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 0.47 · 14.6% (28 of 192 decks)
- Toph, the Blind Bandit relevance 0.46 · 16.7% (32 of 192 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.45 · 15.6% (30 of 192 decks)
- Wreck and Rebuild relevance 0.44 · 9.9% (19 of 192 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 1.01 · 15.6% (30 of 192 decks)
- Skyshroud Ranger relevance 0.78 · 12.5% (24 of 192 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.68 · 18.8% (36 of 192 decks)
- Murasa Rootgrazer relevance 0.68 · 13.0% (25 of 192 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.65 · 16.7% (32 of 192 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.65 · 18.2% (35 of 192 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.64 · 10.4% (20 of 192 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.62 · 9.9% (19 of 192 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.58 · 17.7% (34 of 192 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.56 · 18.2% (35 of 192 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.56 · 24.0% (46 of 192 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.55 · 18.2% (35 of 192 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.54 · 10.4% (20 of 192 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.53 · 16.1% (31 of 192 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.50 · 15.1% (29 of 192 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.50 · 15.6% (30 of 192 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.50 · 17.7% (34 of 192 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.48 · 11.5% (22 of 192 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 0.47 · 14.6% (28 of 192 decks)
- Toph, the Blind Bandit relevance 0.46 · 16.7% (32 of 192 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.45 · 15.6% (30 of 192 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.44 · 13.0% (25 of 192 decks)
- The Earth King relevance 0.43 · 12.0% (23 of 192 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.42 · 15.1% (29 of 192 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Druid Class relevance 0.81 · 18.2% (35 of 192 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.51 · 12.5% (24 of 192 decks)
- Bitter Work relevance 0.48 · 15.6% (30 of 192 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.43 · 13.0% (25 of 192 decks)
All instants (3)
- Harrow relevance 0.66 · 25.0% (48 of 192 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.59 · 15.6% (30 of 192 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.49 · 16.1% (31 of 192 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Explore relevance 0.90 · 32.8% (63 of 192 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.53 · 15.1% (29 of 192 decks)
- Wreck and Rebuild relevance 0.44 · 9.9% (19 of 192 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.43 · 10.9% (21 of 192 decks)
All utility lands (12)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 0.48 · 15.1% (29 of 192 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 0.46 · 13.5% (26 of 192 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.45 · 16.1% (31 of 192 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.45 · 19.8% (38 of 192 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 0.44 · 13.0% (25 of 192 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 0.44 · 13.0% (25 of 192 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 0.44 · 13.0% (25 of 192 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.44 · 13.0% (25 of 192 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 0.43 · 12.5% (24 of 192 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.43 · 13.5% (26 of 192 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 0.43 · 12.5% (24 of 192 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 0.42 · 12.0% (23 of 192 decks)
All lands (3)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.57 · 33.3% (64 of 192 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.56 · 44.8% (86 of 192 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.44 · 17.7% (34 of 192 decks)
EDH data for Scaled Herbalist: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 192 real decks.













































