Apex Devastator
Played in 12,405 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 3.60 · 61.5% (1,997 of 3,247 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 3.10 · 37.8% (2,717 of 7,184 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 3.09 · 38.7% (2,465 of 6,366 decks)
- Volo, Guide to Monsters relevance 2.35 · 24.9% (1,396 of 5,603 decks)
- Gandalf, Westward Voyager relevance 2.17 · 38.1% (251 of 659 decks)
- Alaundo the Seer relevance 2.04 · 27.3% (409 of 1,496 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 1.93 · 41.5% (113 of 272 decks)
- Troyan, Gutsy Explorer relevance 1.67 · 27.6% (132 of 478 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 1.67 · 39.2% (65 of 166 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.55 · 42.2% (43 of 102 decks)
- Kellan, Inquisitive Prodigy // Tail the Suspect relevance 1.52 · 25.0% (106 of 424 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 1.29 · 14.8% (180 of 1,219 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 1.06 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.99 · 11.3% (103 of 914 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.93 · 26.8% (15 of 56 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.84 · 9.8% (76 of 779 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.71 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Sixth Doctor relevance 0.65 · 13.5% (15 of 111 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Third Doctor relevance 0.57 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.56 · 5.5% (66 of 1,198 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 0.56 · 4.7% (114 of 2,442 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.55 · 3.5% (334 of 9,564 decks)
- The Thirteenth Doctor // Clara Oswald relevance 0.52 · 11.6% (10 of 86 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.51 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.50 · 3.9% (134 of 3,413 decks)
- Momir Vig, Simic Visionary relevance 0.50 · 5.1% (56 of 1,106 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.48 · 50.0% (2 of 4 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.48 · 50.0% (2 of 4 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.46 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
- Eligeth, Crossroads Augur // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.46 · 15.6% (5 of 32 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Terastodon relevance 1.00 · 33.8% (4,196 of 12,405 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.98 · 29.9% (3,708 of 12,405 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.93 · 28.9% (3,581 of 12,405 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.84 · 25.9% (3,219 of 12,405 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.84 · 32.1% (3,976 of 12,405 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.81 · 39.4% (4,891 of 12,405 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.79 · 22.3% (2,767 of 12,405 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 0.76 · 20.6% (2,552 of 12,405 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.74 · 20.3% (2,517 of 12,405 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.74 · 19.0% (2,363 of 12,405 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.73 · 27.7% (3,435 of 12,405 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.73 · 33.9% (4,200 of 12,405 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.72 · 29.8% (3,702 of 12,405 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.72 · 21.8% (2,708 of 12,405 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.71 · 19.1% (2,371 of 12,405 decks)
- March from Velis Vel relevance 0.70 · 16.9% (2,098 of 12,405 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.69 · 33.1% (4,102 of 12,405 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.69 · 22.0% (2,735 of 12,405 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.69 · 18.0% (2,232 of 12,405 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.68 · 16.4% (2,029 of 12,405 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.67 · 18.4% (2,285 of 12,405 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.65 · 43.1% (5,348 of 12,405 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.65 · 25.0% (3,106 of 12,405 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 0.64 · 16.4% (2,040 of 12,405 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 0.64 · 19.3% (2,400 of 12,405 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.63 · 25.6% (3,178 of 12,405 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.63 · 19.1% (2,372 of 12,405 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.62 · 33.8% (4,194 of 12,405 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.62 · 32.3% (4,008 of 12,405 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.60 · 13.6% (1,687 of 12,405 decks)
All creatures (16)
- Terastodon relevance 1.00 · 33.8% (4,196 of 12,405 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.84 · 25.9% (3,219 of 12,405 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.81 · 39.4% (4,891 of 12,405 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.79 · 22.3% (2,767 of 12,405 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 0.76 · 20.6% (2,552 of 12,405 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.73 · 27.7% (3,435 of 12,405 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.71 · 19.1% (2,371 of 12,405 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.69 · 33.1% (4,102 of 12,405 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.69 · 18.0% (2,232 of 12,405 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.67 · 18.4% (2,285 of 12,405 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.65 · 25.0% (3,106 of 12,405 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 0.64 · 16.4% (2,040 of 12,405 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.62 · 33.8% (4,194 of 12,405 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.62 · 32.3% (4,008 of 12,405 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.60 · 13.6% (1,687 of 12,405 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.59 · 18.3% (2,267 of 12,405 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.63 · 19.1% (2,372 of 12,405 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.93 · 28.9% (3,581 of 12,405 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.74 · 19.0% (2,363 of 12,405 decks)
All instants (4)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.73 · 33.9% (4,200 of 12,405 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.72 · 21.8% (2,708 of 12,405 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.65 · 43.1% (5,348 of 12,405 decks)
- Natural Reclamation relevance 0.60 · 13.6% (1,687 of 12,405 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.98 · 29.9% (3,708 of 12,405 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.84 · 32.1% (3,976 of 12,405 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.74 · 20.3% (2,517 of 12,405 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.72 · 29.8% (3,702 of 12,405 decks)
- March from Velis Vel relevance 0.70 · 16.9% (2,098 of 12,405 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.69 · 22.0% (2,735 of 12,405 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.68 · 16.4% (2,029 of 12,405 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 0.64 · 19.3% (2,400 of 12,405 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.63 · 25.6% (3,178 of 12,405 decks)
All utility lands (10)
- Glimmerpost relevance 0.77 · 20.5% (2,542 of 12,405 decks)
- Trenchpost relevance 0.74 · 18.9% (2,348 of 12,405 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.74 · 20.5% (2,546 of 12,405 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.70 · 24.0% (2,971 of 12,405 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.69 · 20.2% (2,501 of 12,405 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.69 · 17.0% (2,105 of 12,405 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.67 · 16.6% (2,064 of 12,405 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.66 · 18.9% (2,339 of 12,405 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.64 · 22.5% (2,788 of 12,405 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.61 · 14.4% (1,792 of 12,405 decks)
All lands (8)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.78 · 22.0% (2,728 of 12,405 decks)
- Cloudpost relevance 0.78 · 22.3% (2,761 of 12,405 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.77 · 23.7% (2,940 of 12,405 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.77 · 23.7% (2,940 of 12,405 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.77 · 23.9% (2,959 of 12,405 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.74 · 23.6% (2,930 of 12,405 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.67 · 22.6% (2,798 of 12,405 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.66 · 38.0% (4,713 of 12,405 decks)
EDH data for Apex Devastator: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 12,405 real decks.