Restore
Played in 334 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (9)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 3.07 · 6.3% (84 of 1,334 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.40 · 2.0% (17 of 852 decks)
- She-Hulk, Jade Defender relevance 0.84 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Hardy Outlander relevance 0.75 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Mythweaver Poq relevance 0.52 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
- Shizuko, Caller of Autumn relevance 0.49 · 1.6% (2 of 127 decks)
- Glissa Sunseeker relevance 0.30 · 1.5% (1 of 68 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen of Efrava relevance 0.30 · 1.5% (1 of 68 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.26 · 1.0% (1 of 96 decks)
All most relevant (28)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.27 · 41.0% (137 of 334 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.03 · 57.2% (191 of 334 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.99 · 39.8% (133 of 334 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.96 · 36.2% (121 of 334 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.93 · 27.2% (91 of 334 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.92 · 32.6% (109 of 334 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.90 · 33.8% (113 of 334 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.86 · 50.3% (168 of 334 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.83 · 30.2% (101 of 334 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.83 · 36.5% (122 of 334 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.79 · 28.1% (94 of 334 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.77 · 46.4% (155 of 334 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.73 · 24.6% (82 of 334 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 0.71 · 15.0% (50 of 334 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.70 · 26.6% (89 of 334 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.70 · 22.2% (74 of 334 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.70 · 14.4% (48 of 334 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.70 · 37.1% (124 of 334 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.70 · 18.0% (60 of 334 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.67 · 35.0% (117 of 334 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.67 · 34.7% (116 of 334 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.66 · 29.3% (98 of 334 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.64 · 21.6% (72 of 334 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.64 · 14.1% (47 of 334 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.63 · 34.4% (115 of 334 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.62 · 38.0% (127 of 334 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.61 · 20.7% (69 of 334 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.60 · 25.1% (84 of 334 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.99 · 39.8% (133 of 334 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.92 · 32.6% (109 of 334 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.90 · 33.8% (113 of 334 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.83 · 36.5% (122 of 334 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.73 · 24.6% (82 of 334 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.67 · 35.0% (117 of 334 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.67 · 34.7% (116 of 334 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.66 · 29.3% (98 of 334 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.64 · 14.1% (47 of 334 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.62 · 38.0% (127 of 334 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.60 · 25.1% (84 of 334 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.83 · 30.2% (101 of 334 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.70 · 26.6% (89 of 334 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.64 · 21.6% (72 of 334 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.70 · 14.4% (48 of 334 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.70 · 37.1% (124 of 334 decks)
All instants (5)
- Harrow relevance 1.03 · 57.2% (191 of 334 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.96 · 36.2% (121 of 334 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.86 · 50.3% (168 of 334 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.63 · 34.4% (115 of 334 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.61 · 20.7% (69 of 334 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.27 · 41.0% (137 of 334 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.93 · 27.2% (91 of 334 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.79 · 28.1% (94 of 334 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.77 · 46.4% (155 of 334 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 0.71 · 15.0% (50 of 334 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.70 · 22.2% (74 of 334 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.70 · 18.0% (60 of 334 decks)
All utility lands (8)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.99 · 35.9% (120 of 334 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.98 · 34.1% (114 of 334 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.96 · 34.4% (115 of 334 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.83 · 29.3% (98 of 334 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.74 · 24.9% (83 of 334 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.72 · 44.0% (147 of 334 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.67 · 28.1% (94 of 334 decks)
- Petrified Field relevance 0.65 · 14.4% (48 of 334 decks)
All lands (14)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 1.07 · 56.9% (190 of 334 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 1.04 · 51.5% (172 of 334 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.90 · 46.7% (156 of 334 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.74 · 15.9% (53 of 334 decks)
- Jund Panorama relevance 0.69 · 14.1% (47 of 334 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.68 · 28.4% (95 of 334 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.68 · 28.4% (95 of 334 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.67 · 28.4% (95 of 334 decks)
- Naya Panorama relevance 0.66 · 14.1% (47 of 334 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.66 · 28.7% (96 of 334 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.65 · 15.9% (53 of 334 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.63 · 19.8% (66 of 334 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.62 · 23.4% (78 of 334 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.60 · 18.0% (60 of 334 decks)
EDH data for Restore: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 334 real decks.