Cards like Ghostly Flicker
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Frost Lynx
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Frost Lynx 67%
- Chillbringer 44%
Other options: Icefall Regent, Frost Trickster, Stitched Mangler, Dragon Turtle, Dungeon Geists, Juvenile Mist Dragon, Watertrap Weaver
Cards like Planar Incision
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.99 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Planar Incision 42%
- Teferi's Time Twist 38%
- Essence Flux 15%
- Spaceshift 4%
Cards like Living Totem
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Living Totem 56%
- Guardian Gladewalker 42%
Other options: Satyr Grovedancer, Ridgescale Tusker, Ironshell Beetle, Dauntless Survivor, Bond Beetle, Kujar Seedsculptor, Timberland Guide
Cards like Khalni Heart Expedition
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Vaporkin
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Vaporkin 35%
- Cloud Elemental 22%
Other options: Welkin Tern, Cloud Sprite, Rishadan Airship, Cloud Dragon, Cloud Djinn, Hoverguard Observer, Ascending Aven, Tattered Haunter, Shacklegeist, Wanderlight Spirit, Scrapskin Drake, Cloud Spirit, Long-Finned Skywhale, Stormbound Geist, Cloud Pirates, Stronghold Zeppelin, Skywinder Drake, Stratozeppelid
Cards like Wave-Wing Elemental
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Wave-Wing Elemental 62%
- Windrider Eel 11%
- Canopy Baloth 6%
- Icecave Crasher 4%
- Snapping Gnarlid 4%
- Hedron Scrabbler 3%
- Hedron Rover 1%
- Boughside Wanderers 1%
- Territorial Baloth 1%
Other options: Attercop, Scythe Leopard, Baloth Woodcrasher
Cards like Sporemound
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Sporemound 20%
- Elfsworn Giant 16%
Cards like Thought Vessel
5.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Counterspell
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 42%
- Negate 28%
- Intervene 1%
- Essence Scatter 1%
- Wild Unraveling 1%
Other options: Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Wash Away, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Outwit
Cards like Mana Leak
4.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mana Leak 15%
- Spell Pierce 5%
- Force Spike 1%
- It'll Quench Ya! 1%
Other options: Reasonable Doubt, Lose Focus, Clash of Wills, Make Disappear, Revolutionary Rebuff, Logic Knot, Metallic Rebuke, Rethink, Don't Make a Sound, Quench
Cards like Growth Spiral
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.55 in other Simic decks
Cards like Capsize
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Surging Aether, Cut the Earthly Bond, Eye of Nowhere, Regress, Rescind, Lost in the Mist, Wipe Away
Cards like Vorstclaw
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Vorstclaw 23%
- Moss Monster 3%
Other options: Scaled Wurm, Broodhunter Wurm, Barbtooth Wurm, Grizzled Outrider, Order of the Sacred Bell, Leatherback Baloth, Gnarled Mass, Canopy Gorger, Pheres-Band Centaurs, Trained Armodon, Wild Ceratok, Murasa Brute, Enormous Baloth, Cowl Prowler, Golden Bear, Spined Karok, Ancient Brontodon, Southern Elephant, Durkwood Boars, Feral Krushok, Axebane Beast, Hollowhenge Beast, Vastwood Gorger, Blanchwood Treefolk, Axebane Stag, Silverback Ape, Primordial Wurm, Colossapede, Ironroot Treefolk, Tusked Colossodon, Thornhide Wolves, Kindercatch, Plated Wurm, Quakestrider Ceratops, Gigantosaurus, Nema Siltlurker, Nettle Swine
Cards like Wild Growth
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Verdant Haven, Market Festival, Glittering Frost, Dawn's Reflection, Wolfwillow Haven, Shimmerwilds Growth, Overgrowth
Cards like Primal Plasma
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Cloudkin Seer
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
85% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards like Adventuring Gear
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Brambleweft Behemoth
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Charging Badger, Giant Warthog, Force of Savagery, Pygmy Razorback, Archweaver, Wild Elephant, Moss Kami, Wildwood Patrol, Earthshaking Si, Defiant Elf, Warriors of Wakanda, Argothian Swine, Goliath Beetle, Stampeding Rhino, Yavimaya Wurm, Stomper Cub, Havenwood Wurm, Duskdale Wurm, War Mammoth, Crash of Rhinos, Fangren Hunter, Rootbreaker Wurm, Tangle Mantis, Vulpine Goliath, Spiked Baloth, Hippo-Cows
Cards like Return to Nature
6.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Embodiment of Spring
5.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Krosan Wayfarer, Diligent Farmhand, Oashra Cultivator, Dawntreader Elk
All top picks (50)
- Thicket Crasher relevance 0.82 · 79.7% (63 of 79 decks)
- Cloudkin Seer relevance 0.70 · 84.8% (67 of 79 decks)
- Thunder Drake relevance 0.81 · 68.4% (54 of 79 decks)
- Embodiment of Spring relevance 0.68 · 82.3% (65 of 79 decks)
- Frost Lynx relevance 0.79 · 67.1% (53 of 79 decks)
- Ivy Elemental relevance 0.73 · 74.7% (59 of 79 decks)
- Healer of the Glade relevance 0.78 · 68.4% (54 of 79 decks)
- Walker of the Grove relevance 0.73 · 68.4% (54 of 79 decks)
- Living Totem relevance 0.81 · 55.7% (44 of 79 decks)
- Zephyr Winder relevance 0.79 · 57.0% (45 of 79 decks)
- Leafkin Druid relevance 0.57 · 87.3% (69 of 79 decks)
- Wave-Wing Elemental relevance 0.73 · 62.0% (49 of 79 decks)
- Floodhound relevance 0.67 · 69.6% (55 of 79 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 0.59 · 82.3% (65 of 79 decks)
- Hydromorph Guardian relevance 0.78 · 53.2% (42 of 79 decks)
- Silverglade Elemental relevance 0.77 · 50.6% (40 of 79 decks)
- Chillbringer relevance 0.78 · 44.3% (35 of 79 decks)
- Phase Dolphin relevance 0.69 · 50.6% (40 of 79 decks)
- Brackwater Elemental relevance 0.78 · 34.2% (27 of 79 decks)
- Vaporkin relevance 0.76 · 35.4% (28 of 79 decks)
- Brambleweft Behemoth relevance 0.73 · 36.7% (29 of 79 decks)
- Blanchwood Prowler relevance 0.64 · 46.8% (37 of 79 decks)
- Boreal Elemental relevance 0.74 · 30.4% (24 of 79 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.47 · 74.7% (59 of 79 decks)
- Glade Watcher relevance 0.73 · 30.4% (24 of 79 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 0.73 · 29.1% (23 of 79 decks)
- Wavesifter relevance 0.49 · 68.4% (54 of 79 decks)
- Glimmerbell relevance 0.67 · 35.4% (28 of 79 decks)
- Primal Plasma relevance 0.70 · 26.6% (21 of 79 decks)
- Summit Sentinel relevance 0.63 · 34.2% (27 of 79 decks)
- Cloud Elemental relevance 0.70 · 21.5% (17 of 79 decks)
- Willow-Wind relevance 0.58 · 36.7% (29 of 79 decks)
- Conifer Strider relevance 0.67 · 21.5% (17 of 79 decks)
- Masked Vandal relevance 0.43 · 63.3% (50 of 79 decks)
- Adventuring Gear relevance 0.53 · 43.0% (34 of 79 decks)
- Air-Cult Elemental relevance 0.61 · 27.8% (22 of 79 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 0.64 · 22.8% (18 of 79 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.35 · 83.5% (66 of 79 decks)
- Aquatic Alchemist // Bubble Up relevance 0.59 · 30.4% (24 of 79 decks)
- Orchard Elemental relevance 0.53 · 34.2% (27 of 79 decks)
- Guardian Gladewalker relevance 0.49 · 41.8% (33 of 79 decks)
- Ice Flan relevance 0.56 · 27.8% (22 of 79 decks)
- Universal Automaton relevance 0.50 · 38.0% (30 of 79 decks)
- Bloom Hulk relevance 0.53 · 29.1% (23 of 79 decks)
- Icewind Elemental relevance 0.57 · 19.0% (15 of 79 decks)
- Territorial Scythecat relevance 0.47 · 39.2% (31 of 79 decks)
- Tumbleweed Rising relevance 0.50 · 31.6% (25 of 79 decks)
- Barkweave Crusher relevance 0.59 · 15.2% (12 of 79 decks)
- Cytospawn Shambler relevance 0.54 · 22.8% (18 of 79 decks)
- Littjara Kinseekers relevance 0.51 · 26.6% (21 of 79 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Thicket Crasher relevance 0.82 · 79.7% (63 of 79 decks)
- Cloudkin Seer relevance 0.70 · 84.8% (67 of 79 decks)
- Thunder Drake relevance 0.81 · 68.4% (54 of 79 decks)
- Embodiment of Spring relevance 0.68 · 82.3% (65 of 79 decks)
- Frost Lynx relevance 0.79 · 67.1% (53 of 79 decks)
- Ivy Elemental relevance 0.73 · 74.7% (59 of 79 decks)
- Healer of the Glade relevance 0.78 · 68.4% (54 of 79 decks)
- Walker of the Grove relevance 0.73 · 68.4% (54 of 79 decks)
- Living Totem relevance 0.81 · 55.7% (44 of 79 decks)
- Zephyr Winder relevance 0.79 · 57.0% (45 of 79 decks)
- Leafkin Druid relevance 0.57 · 87.3% (69 of 79 decks)
- Wave-Wing Elemental relevance 0.73 · 62.0% (49 of 79 decks)
- Floodhound relevance 0.67 · 69.6% (55 of 79 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 0.59 · 82.3% (65 of 79 decks)
- Hydromorph Guardian relevance 0.78 · 53.2% (42 of 79 decks)
- Silverglade Elemental relevance 0.77 · 50.6% (40 of 79 decks)
- Chillbringer relevance 0.78 · 44.3% (35 of 79 decks)
- Phase Dolphin relevance 0.69 · 50.6% (40 of 79 decks)
- Brackwater Elemental relevance 0.78 · 34.2% (27 of 79 decks)
- Vaporkin relevance 0.76 · 35.4% (28 of 79 decks)
- Brambleweft Behemoth relevance 0.73 · 36.7% (29 of 79 decks)
- Blanchwood Prowler relevance 0.64 · 46.8% (37 of 79 decks)
- Boreal Elemental relevance 0.74 · 30.4% (24 of 79 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.47 · 74.7% (59 of 79 decks)
- Glade Watcher relevance 0.73 · 30.4% (24 of 79 decks)
- Terrain Elemental relevance 0.73 · 29.1% (23 of 79 decks)
- Wavesifter relevance 0.49 · 68.4% (54 of 79 decks)
- Glimmerbell relevance 0.67 · 35.4% (28 of 79 decks)
- Primal Plasma relevance 0.70 · 26.6% (21 of 79 decks)
- Summit Sentinel relevance 0.63 · 34.2% (27 of 79 decks)
- Cloud Elemental relevance 0.70 · 21.5% (17 of 79 decks)
- Willow-Wind relevance 0.58 · 36.7% (29 of 79 decks)
- Conifer Strider relevance 0.67 · 21.5% (17 of 79 decks)
- Masked Vandal relevance 0.43 · 63.3% (50 of 79 decks)
- Air-Cult Elemental relevance 0.61 · 27.8% (22 of 79 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 0.64 · 22.8% (18 of 79 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.35 · 83.5% (66 of 79 decks)
- Aquatic Alchemist // Bubble Up relevance 0.59 · 30.4% (24 of 79 decks)
- Orchard Elemental relevance 0.53 · 34.2% (27 of 79 decks)
- Guardian Gladewalker relevance 0.49 · 41.8% (33 of 79 decks)
- Ice Flan relevance 0.56 · 27.8% (22 of 79 decks)
- Universal Automaton relevance 0.50 · 38.0% (30 of 79 decks)
- Bloom Hulk relevance 0.53 · 29.1% (23 of 79 decks)
- Icewind Elemental relevance 0.57 · 19.0% (15 of 79 decks)
- Territorial Scythecat relevance 0.47 · 39.2% (31 of 79 decks)
- Barkweave Crusher relevance 0.59 · 15.2% (12 of 79 decks)
- Cytospawn Shambler relevance 0.54 · 22.8% (18 of 79 decks)
- Littjara Kinseekers relevance 0.51 · 26.6% (21 of 79 decks)
- Snowmelt Stag relevance 0.55 · 16.5% (13 of 79 decks)
- Preening Champion relevance 0.52 · 13.9% (11 of 79 decks)
All artifacts (23)
- Adventuring Gear relevance 0.53 · 43.0% (34 of 79 decks)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.40 · 21.5% (17 of 79 decks)
- Neurok Stealthsuit relevance 0.37 · 12.7% (10 of 79 decks)
- Stalactite Dagger relevance 0.34 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 0.32 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Colossal Dreadmask relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Aether Spellbomb relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.19 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Bonesplitter relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.13 · 21.5% (17 of 79 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Bonder's Ornament relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Campfire relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.15 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Library of Leng relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.10 · 19.0% (15 of 79 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.10 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Springleaf Drum relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.04 · 32.9% (26 of 79 decks)
All enchantments (34)
- Ior Ruin Expedition relevance 0.44 · 30.4% (24 of 79 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.33 · 36.7% (29 of 79 decks)
- Fall from Favor relevance 0.43 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Crown of Vigor relevance 0.38 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.28 · 19.0% (15 of 79 decks)
- Crown of Ascension relevance 0.35 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.25 · 11.4% (9 of 79 decks)
- Diplomatic Immunity relevance 0.26 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Nissa's Zendikon relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.22 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Shielding Plax relevance 0.21 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Wind Zendikon relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.18 · 17.7% (14 of 79 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.18 · 12.7% (10 of 79 decks)
- Vastwood Zendikon relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Frogify relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Predatory Hunger relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.15 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Careful Cultivation relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Favor of the Overbeing relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Utter Insignificance relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Omen of the Sea relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.07 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.06 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
All instants (50)
- Displace relevance 0.39 · 48.1% (38 of 79 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.39 · 38.0% (30 of 79 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.37 · 41.8% (33 of 79 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.31 · 58.2% (46 of 79 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.32 · 48.1% (38 of 79 decks)
- Curfew relevance 0.45 · 11.4% (9 of 79 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.36 · 19.0% (15 of 79 decks)
- Mysteries of the Deep relevance 0.38 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.31 · 20.3% (16 of 79 decks)
- Muse's Encouragement relevance 0.36 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.27 · 15.2% (12 of 79 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.25 · 22.8% (18 of 79 decks)
- Ranger's Guile relevance 0.31 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Groundswell relevance 0.31 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 0.29 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.24 · 15.2% (12 of 79 decks)
- Into the Roil relevance 0.26 · 11.4% (9 of 79 decks)
- Siren's Ruse relevance 0.27 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.23 · 15.2% (12 of 79 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.24 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.17 · 34.2% (27 of 79 decks)
- Luminescent Rain relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.24 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Blink of an Eye relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Mizzium Skin relevance 0.25 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.23 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.20 · 13.9% (11 of 79 decks)
- Spaceshift relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.18 · 13.9% (11 of 79 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.22 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.19 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Echoing Truth relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.16 · 12.7% (10 of 79 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.15 · 17.7% (14 of 79 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Glorious Decay relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Dive Down relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Ambuscade relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.13 · 27.8% (22 of 79 decks)
- Abjure relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.13 · 22.8% (18 of 79 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Tumbleweed Rising relevance 0.50 · 31.6% (25 of 79 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.46 · 34.2% (27 of 79 decks)
- Distant Melody relevance 0.35 · 54.4% (43 of 79 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.25 · 20.3% (16 of 79 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 0.31 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.25 · 19.0% (15 of 79 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.21 · 24.1% (19 of 79 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.20 · 24.1% (19 of 79 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.22 · 12.7% (10 of 79 decks)
- Gleeful Sabotage relevance 0.27 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Leyline Invocation relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- You Meet in a Tavern relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.22 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.19 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.20 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Mirage Mockery relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Aggressive Instinct relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Earthen Arms relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Lead the Stampede relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Adventure Awaits relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Brave the Wilds relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Thrive relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Ent's Fury relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.12 · 15.2% (12 of 79 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Longstalk Brawl relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Chocobo Kick relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Commune with Beavers relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.10 · 17.7% (14 of 79 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Carnivorous Canopy relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Revive the Shire relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Abundant Harvest relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.08 · 21.5% (17 of 79 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.08 · 26.6% (21 of 79 decks)
- Rally the Galadhrim relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Over the Edge relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.08 · 13.9% (11 of 79 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
All utility lands (34)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.32 · 35.4% (28 of 79 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.23 · 40.5% (32 of 79 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.30 · 12.7% (10 of 79 decks)
- Fertile Thicket relevance 0.32 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.17 · 60.8% (48 of 79 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.25 · 12.7% (10 of 79 decks)
- Skyline Cascade relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.22 · 13.9% (11 of 79 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.23 · 10.1% (8 of 79 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.24 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.21 · 12.7% (10 of 79 decks)
- Meditation Pools relevance 0.23 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.17 · 22.8% (18 of 79 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.23 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.21 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.22 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.16 · 11.4% (9 of 79 decks)
- Adventurer's Inn relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.16 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Study Hall relevance 0.15 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.15 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 0.13 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Cave of Temptation relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- The Surgical Bay relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Captivating Cave relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.06 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
All lands (42)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.28 · 27.8% (22 of 79 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.23 · 35.4% (28 of 79 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.27 · 11.4% (9 of 79 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.23 · 22.8% (18 of 79 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.19 · 44.3% (35 of 79 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.23 · 17.7% (14 of 79 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.23 · 16.5% (13 of 79 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.16 · 26.6% (21 of 79 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Guadosalam, Farplane Gateway relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (5 of 79 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.18 · 8.9% (7 of 79 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.13 · 27.8% (22 of 79 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Mutant Town relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Obscura Storefront relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.16 · 7.6% (6 of 79 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.16 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.16 · 5.1% (4 of 79 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Holdout Settlement relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.12 · 19.0% (15 of 79 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.09 · 38.0% (30 of 79 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Command Bridge relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.02 · 62.0% (49 of 79 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.04 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 72.2% (57 of 79 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.02 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 72.2% (57 of 79 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.03 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.02 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.02 · 2.5% (2 of 79 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Risen Reef, from 79 real Commander decks.