Kamahl's Will
Played in 2,023 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
23.7% Green
All commanders (30)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 3.96 · 30.4% (478 of 1,574 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 2.45 · 21.8% (67 of 307 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 2.34 · 26.9% (43 of 160 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 2.31 · 36.1% (30 of 83 decks)
- Autumn Willow, Harmony relevance 2.08 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 2.06 · 11.1% (86 of 776 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 1.96 · 9.5% (90 of 948 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.95 · 25.0% (24 of 96 decks)
- Anthousa, Setessan Hero relevance 1.71 · 24.6% (16 of 65 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 1.68 · 7.1% (76 of 1,070 decks)
- Bumi, Eclectic Earthbender relevance 1.65 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 1.45 · 41.2% (7 of 17 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 1.39 · 5.4% (57 of 1,063 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 1.28 · 7.0% (27 of 384 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.28 · 4.2% (68 of 1,633 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.25 · 4.3% (56 of 1,292 decks)
- Avatar Kyoshi, Earthbender relevance 1.18 · 4.7% (39 of 833 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.08 · 2.6% (94 of 3,561 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 1.07 · 2.6% (98 of 3,820 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 1.00 · 5.8% (16 of 276 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.95 · 3.2% (36 of 1,126 decks)
- Baru, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.90 · 9.3% (7 of 75 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 0.78 · 9.6% (5 of 52 decks)
- Harold and Bob, First Numens relevance 0.78 · 7.7% (6 of 78 decks)
- Toph, the Blind Bandit relevance 0.75 · 4.9% (9 of 184 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.64 · 11.1% (3 of 27 decks)
- The Earth King relevance 0.51 · 1.4% (22 of 1,530 decks)
- Arasta of the Endless Web relevance 0.50 · 3.1% (6 of 194 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.50 · 2.1% (10 of 477 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.50 · 1.7% (14 of 814 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 1.70 · 38.7% (783 of 2,023 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 1.22 · 28.5% (576 of 2,023 decks)
- Ainok Survivalist relevance 1.02 · 20.1% (407 of 2,023 decks)
- Den Protector relevance 1.00 · 19.8% (401 of 2,023 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.97 · 20.1% (406 of 2,023 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 0.92 · 22.0% (446 of 2,023 decks)
- Living Lands relevance 0.92 · 17.3% (350 of 2,023 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.91 · 27.9% (565 of 2,023 decks)
- Nantuko Vigilante relevance 0.89 · 16.6% (336 of 2,023 decks)
- Ambush Commander relevance 0.89 · 18.7% (378 of 2,023 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.86 · 16.2% (328 of 2,023 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.85 · 41.5% (839 of 2,023 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.77 · 37.6% (761 of 2,023 decks)
- Temur Charger relevance 0.76 · 13.9% (281 of 2,023 decks)
- Evolutionary Leap relevance 0.76 · 17.3% (350 of 2,023 decks)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 0.76 · 13.8% (280 of 2,023 decks)
- Nervous Gardener relevance 0.74 · 13.6% (275 of 2,023 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.74 · 38.8% (785 of 2,023 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.74 · 26.8% (542 of 2,023 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.73 · 23.9% (483 of 2,023 decks)
- Hauntwoods Shrieker relevance 0.72 · 13.5% (274 of 2,023 decks)
- Threats Around Every Corner relevance 0.71 · 12.5% (253 of 2,023 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.70 · 24.9% (504 of 2,023 decks)
- Flourishing Bloom-Kin relevance 0.69 · 13.7% (278 of 2,023 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 0.68 · 13.0% (262 of 2,023 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.67 · 13.5% (274 of 2,023 decks)
- Proteus Machine relevance 0.65 · 11.8% (238 of 2,023 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.65 · 32.7% (662 of 2,023 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.65 · 19.9% (403 of 2,023 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.65 · 19.7% (399 of 2,023 decks)
All creatures (31)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 1.22 · 28.5% (576 of 2,023 decks)
- Ainok Survivalist relevance 1.02 · 20.1% (407 of 2,023 decks)
- Den Protector relevance 1.00 · 19.8% (401 of 2,023 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.91 · 27.9% (565 of 2,023 decks)
- Nantuko Vigilante relevance 0.89 · 16.6% (336 of 2,023 decks)
- Ambush Commander relevance 0.89 · 18.7% (378 of 2,023 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.77 · 37.6% (761 of 2,023 decks)
- Temur Charger relevance 0.76 · 13.9% (281 of 2,023 decks)
- Nervous Gardener relevance 0.74 · 13.6% (275 of 2,023 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.74 · 38.8% (785 of 2,023 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.73 · 23.9% (483 of 2,023 decks)
- Hauntwoods Shrieker relevance 0.72 · 13.5% (274 of 2,023 decks)
- Flourishing Bloom-Kin relevance 0.69 · 13.7% (278 of 2,023 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 0.68 · 13.0% (262 of 2,023 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.67 · 13.5% (274 of 2,023 decks)
- Proteus Machine relevance 0.65 · 11.8% (238 of 2,023 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.65 · 32.7% (662 of 2,023 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.65 · 19.9% (403 of 2,023 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.65 · 19.7% (399 of 2,023 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.63 · 26.5% (536 of 2,023 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.63 · 38.2% (773 of 2,023 decks)
- Spore Frog relevance 0.59 · 17.7% (358 of 2,023 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.58 · 29.3% (592 of 2,023 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.58 · 30.4% (614 of 2,023 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.56 · 22.4% (453 of 2,023 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.55 · 23.9% (484 of 2,023 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.55 · 29.0% (586 of 2,023 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.52 · 12.8% (259 of 2,023 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.51 · 22.7% (460 of 2,023 decks)
- Dawntreader Elk relevance 0.50 · 9.7% (196 of 2,023 decks)
- Magus of the Order relevance 0.50 · 10.8% (218 of 2,023 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.74 · 26.8% (542 of 2,023 decks)
All enchantments (8)
- Life and Limb relevance 0.92 · 22.0% (446 of 2,023 decks)
- Living Lands relevance 0.92 · 17.3% (350 of 2,023 decks)
- Evolutionary Leap relevance 0.76 · 17.3% (350 of 2,023 decks)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 0.76 · 13.8% (280 of 2,023 decks)
- Threats Around Every Corner relevance 0.71 · 12.5% (253 of 2,023 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.70 · 24.9% (504 of 2,023 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.64 · 20.1% (406 of 2,023 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.59 · 15.8% (319 of 2,023 decks)
All instants (3)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.86 · 16.2% (328 of 2,023 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.64 · 35.6% (721 of 2,023 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.52 · 19.6% (397 of 2,023 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 1.70 · 38.7% (783 of 2,023 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.97 · 20.1% (406 of 2,023 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.58 · 19.8% (400 of 2,023 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.85 · 41.5% (839 of 2,023 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.51 · 13.1% (266 of 2,023 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.59 · 22.4% (453 of 2,023 decks)
All lands (1)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.63 · 17.1% (345 of 2,023 decks)
EDH data for Kamahl's Will: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 2,023 real decks.