Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
5.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other green decks
57% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.43 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Harrow
4.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other green decks
58% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
1.9 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other green decks
Cards
- Harrow 57%
- Entish Restoration 50%
- Roiling Regrowth 33%
- Scapeshift 21%
- Planar Engineering 17%
- Cycle of Renewal 12%
Cards like Ancient Greenwarden
5.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
46% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
73% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
2.5 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 71%
- Kodama's Reach 61%
- Rampant Growth 56%
- Explosive Vegetation 14%
- Shared Roots 11%
- Migration Path 10%
- Search for Tomorrow 5%
- Far Wanderings 5%
- Grow from the Ashes 3%
- Map the Frontier 3%
- Primal Growth 2%
- Roamer's Routine 2%
- Terramorph 1%
- Beneath the Sands 1%
- Reach the Horizon 1%
- New Generation's Technique 1%
- Viewpoint Synchronization 1%
- Deep Reconnaissance 1%
Other options: They Went This Way, Path to the Festival, Peregrination, Verdant Mastery, Map the Wastes, Untamed Wilds
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
53% of decks run two or more
vs. 29% of other green decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 57%
- Three Visits 43%
- Skyshroud Claim 40%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 17%
- Ranger's Path 5%
- Glimpse the Core 4%
Other options: Hunting Wilds, Field Trip
Cards like Scute Swarm
4.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other green decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
- Scute Swarm 66%
- Springheart Nantuko 19%
Cards like Traverse the Outlands
9.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
- Traverse the Outlands 35%
- Boundless Realms 11%
- Reshape the Earth 8%
- Harvest Season 7%
- Nissa's Expedition 2%
Other options: Celebrate the Harvest, New Frontiers, Slimefoot's Survey, Turtle Tracks
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
6.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Mossborn Hydra
2.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other green decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.37 in other green decks
Cards
- Mossborn Hydra 33%
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 15%
- Sazh's Chocobo 8%
- Scythecat Cub 7%
- Oran-Rief Hydra 7%
- Undergrowth Champion 5%
- Territorial Scythecat 4%
- Floral Evoker 2%
- Vinelasher Kudzu 2%
- Seedship Agrarian 2%
Other options: Murasa Ranger, Foe-liage
Cards like Parallel Lives
3.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other green decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards
- Parallel Lives 29%
- Doubling Season 25%
- Primal Vigor 7%
Cards like Exploration
7.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Elemental Bond
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.52 in other green decks
Cards like Cultivator Colossus
5.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Explore
3.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards like Overwhelming Stampede
2.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards like Ashaya, Soul of the Wild
6.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Mirkwood Pathmaker, Flora Colossus
Cards like Lumra, Bellow of the Woods
6.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Titania, Gaea Incarnate
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
1.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Jubilation, Earthshaker Giant, Thundering Ceratok
Cards like Rishkar's Expertise
1.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Krosan Grip
1.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
- Krosan Grip 20%
- Naturalize 6%
Other options: Wilt, Natural Reclamation, Stomp and Howl, Wear Away, Oxidize, Relic Crush, Break Asunder, Verdigris
All top picks (50)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.41 · 61.9% (699 of 1,130 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.48 · 43.7% (494 of 1,130 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.55 · 23.1% (261 of 1,130 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.35 · 65.8% (743 of 1,130 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.48 · 33.2% (375 of 1,130 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.49 · 30.4% (344 of 1,130 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.56 · 17.0% (192 of 1,130 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.42 · 41.8% (472 of 1,130 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.35 · 58.5% (661 of 1,130 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.41 · 43.7% (494 of 1,130 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.45 · 33.1% (374 of 1,130 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.49 · 24.7% (279 of 1,130 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.33 · 62.8% (710 of 1,130 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.45 · 28.8% (325 of 1,130 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.47 · 21.4% (242 of 1,130 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.45 · 26.7% (302 of 1,130 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.41 · 34.1% (385 of 1,130 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.43 · 29.8% (337 of 1,130 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.33 · 56.9% (643 of 1,130 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.41 · 32.7% (370 of 1,130 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.47 · 19.7% (223 of 1,130 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.43 · 27.8% (314 of 1,130 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.45 · 23.0% (260 of 1,130 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.34 · 51.7% (584 of 1,130 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.42 · 28.7% (324 of 1,130 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.34 · 48.3% (546 of 1,130 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.32 · 53.1% (600 of 1,130 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.31 · 57.3% (648 of 1,130 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.38 · 35.5% (401 of 1,130 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.50 · 11.4% (129 of 1,130 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.40 · 27.5% (311 of 1,130 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 0.52 · 9.6% (109 of 1,130 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.48 · 12.1% (137 of 1,130 decks)
- Sporemound relevance 0.49 · 11.7% (132 of 1,130 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.52 · 8.4% (95 of 1,130 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.36 · 35.1% (397 of 1,130 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.48 · 12.1% (137 of 1,130 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.55 · 6.2% (70 of 1,130 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.32 · 48.0% (542 of 1,130 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.42 · 20.3% (229 of 1,130 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.39 · 27.0% (305 of 1,130 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.31 · 49.6% (561 of 1,130 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.39 · 25.1% (284 of 1,130 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.41 · 20.7% (234 of 1,130 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.31 · 46.5% (526 of 1,130 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.40 · 21.5% (243 of 1,130 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.47 · 9.7% (110 of 1,130 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.36 · 28.2% (319 of 1,130 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.48 · 9.1% (103 of 1,130 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.32 · 39.4% (445 of 1,130 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.41 · 61.9% (699 of 1,130 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.35 · 65.8% (743 of 1,130 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.48 · 33.2% (375 of 1,130 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.42 · 41.8% (472 of 1,130 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.41 · 43.7% (494 of 1,130 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.45 · 33.1% (374 of 1,130 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.49 · 24.7% (279 of 1,130 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.33 · 62.8% (710 of 1,130 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.45 · 28.8% (325 of 1,130 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.47 · 21.4% (242 of 1,130 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.33 · 56.9% (643 of 1,130 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.34 · 51.7% (584 of 1,130 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.34 · 48.3% (546 of 1,130 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.32 · 53.1% (600 of 1,130 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.40 · 27.5% (311 of 1,130 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 0.52 · 9.6% (109 of 1,130 decks)
- Sporemound relevance 0.49 · 11.7% (132 of 1,130 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.36 · 35.1% (397 of 1,130 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.48 · 12.1% (137 of 1,130 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.32 · 48.0% (542 of 1,130 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.42 · 20.3% (229 of 1,130 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.39 · 27.0% (305 of 1,130 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.40 · 21.5% (243 of 1,130 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.36 · 28.2% (319 of 1,130 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.32 · 39.4% (445 of 1,130 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.38 · 23.9% (270 of 1,130 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.51 · 6.1% (69 of 1,130 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.53 · 4.7% (53 of 1,130 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 0.44 · 10.9% (123 of 1,130 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (88 of 1,130 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.38 · 17.4% (197 of 1,130 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.32 · 32.6% (368 of 1,130 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.40 · 12.9% (146 of 1,130 decks)
- Undergrowth Champion relevance 0.48 · 5.0% (56 of 1,130 decks)
- Boseiju Reaches Skyward // Branch of Boseiju relevance 0.48 · 5.1% (58 of 1,130 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.34 · 26.3% (297 of 1,130 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.36 · 19.2% (217 of 1,130 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.27 · 45.8% (517 of 1,130 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.39 · 12.4% (140 of 1,130 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.40 · 11.7% (132 of 1,130 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.45 · 5.0% (57 of 1,130 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.45 · 5.3% (60 of 1,130 decks)
- Overlord of the Hauntwoods relevance 0.43 · 5.5% (62 of 1,130 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.42 · 7.3% (83 of 1,130 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.38 · 10.6% (120 of 1,130 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.33 · 20.4% (230 of 1,130 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.38 · 10.8% (122 of 1,130 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.43 · 5.7% (64 of 1,130 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.25 · 45.1% (510 of 1,130 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.34 · 15.4% (174 of 1,130 decks)
All artifacts (30)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.45 · 26.7% (302 of 1,130 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.41 · 34.1% (385 of 1,130 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.43 · 27.8% (314 of 1,130 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.47 · 9.7% (110 of 1,130 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.44 · 9.6% (108 of 1,130 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.37 · 17.4% (197 of 1,130 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.37 · 14.5% (164 of 1,130 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.40 · 11.1% (125 of 1,130 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.38 · 13.2% (149 of 1,130 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.44 · 5.1% (58 of 1,130 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.38 · 6.7% (76 of 1,130 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.37 · 6.8% (77 of 1,130 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.37 · 6.5% (74 of 1,130 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.36 · 6.9% (78 of 1,130 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.34 · 7.8% (88 of 1,130 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.37 · 3.5% (39 of 1,130 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.39 · 2.8% (32 of 1,130 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.21 · 18.8% (212 of 1,130 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (38 of 1,130 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (34 of 1,130 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.18 · 22.5% (254 of 1,130 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.20 · 12.7% (144 of 1,130 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.15 · 39.8% (450 of 1,130 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.18 · 16.2% (183 of 1,130 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.29 · 2.9% (33 of 1,130 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.20 · 5.9% (67 of 1,130 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (36 of 1,130 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.24 · 3.2% (36 of 1,130 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.07 · 58.9% (666 of 1,130 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (29 of 1,130 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.55 · 23.1% (261 of 1,130 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.49 · 30.4% (344 of 1,130 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.35 · 58.5% (661 of 1,130 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.43 · 29.8% (337 of 1,130 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.47 · 19.7% (223 of 1,130 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.42 · 28.7% (324 of 1,130 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.48 · 12.1% (137 of 1,130 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.55 · 6.2% (70 of 1,130 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.39 · 25.1% (284 of 1,130 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.31 · 46.5% (526 of 1,130 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.48 · 9.1% (103 of 1,130 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.29 · 48.6% (549 of 1,130 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.51 · 5.9% (67 of 1,130 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.43 · 11.8% (133 of 1,130 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.43 · 10.2% (115 of 1,130 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.45 · 7.6% (86 of 1,130 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.38 · 14.5% (164 of 1,130 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.41 · 10.7% (121 of 1,130 decks)
- Perilous Forays relevance 0.52 · 4.1% (46 of 1,130 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.31 · 25.5% (288 of 1,130 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.32 · 17.5% (198 of 1,130 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.32 · 14.9% (168 of 1,130 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.38 · 7.2% (81 of 1,130 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.39 · 4.9% (55 of 1,130 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.30 · 16.2% (183 of 1,130 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.35 · 6.3% (71 of 1,130 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.26 · 23.5% (266 of 1,130 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (69 of 1,130 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.30 · 11.5% (130 of 1,130 decks)
- Into the Wilds relevance 0.51 · 2.6% (29 of 1,130 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.30 · 10.6% (120 of 1,130 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.30 · 9.6% (109 of 1,130 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (59 of 1,130 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.32 · 5.5% (62 of 1,130 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.44 · 3.0% (34 of 1,130 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.24 · 16.3% (184 of 1,130 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (109 of 1,130 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.22 · 21.0% (237 of 1,130 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.38 · 3.2% (36 of 1,130 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.42 · 2.5% (28 of 1,130 decks)
- Roaring Earth relevance 0.35 · 3.5% (40 of 1,130 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.30 · 4.5% (51 of 1,130 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.28 · 5.2% (59 of 1,130 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.29 · 4.3% (49 of 1,130 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.26 · 6.1% (69 of 1,130 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.30 · 4.0% (45 of 1,130 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.29 · 3.8% (43 of 1,130 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.31 · 2.8% (32 of 1,130 decks)
- Beorn's Hospitality relevance 0.31 · 2.8% (32 of 1,130 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.25 · 4.2% (48 of 1,130 decks)
All instants (44)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.56 · 17.0% (192 of 1,130 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.41 · 32.7% (370 of 1,130 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.31 · 57.3% (648 of 1,130 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.31 · 49.6% (561 of 1,130 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.43 · 11.3% (128 of 1,130 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.35 · 15.0% (169 of 1,130 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.38 · 11.7% (132 of 1,130 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.27 · 35.8% (404 of 1,130 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.30 · 15.4% (174 of 1,130 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.28 · 19.7% (223 of 1,130 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.29 · 14.2% (161 of 1,130 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.34 · 6.3% (71 of 1,130 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.44 · 3.2% (36 of 1,130 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.30 · 8.1% (92 of 1,130 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.24 · 20.9% (236 of 1,130 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.25 · 17.3% (195 of 1,130 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.22 · 28.8% (325 of 1,130 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.24 · 18.9% (214 of 1,130 decks)
- Seedship Impact relevance 0.44 · 2.6% (29 of 1,130 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (57 of 1,130 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.26 · 9.4% (106 of 1,130 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.25 · 11.3% (128 of 1,130 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.22 · 17.8% (201 of 1,130 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.28 · 6.5% (73 of 1,130 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.18 · 37.7% (426 of 1,130 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.32 · 3.9% (44 of 1,130 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.27 · 5.2% (59 of 1,130 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.25 · 6.9% (78 of 1,130 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.24 · 7.7% (87 of 1,130 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.13 · 49.4% (558 of 1,130 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (34 of 1,130 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.33 · 2.6% (29 of 1,130 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (44 of 1,130 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.19 · 9.8% (111 of 1,130 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.29 · 3.2% (36 of 1,130 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (32 of 1,130 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.11 · 58.7% (663 of 1,130 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (36 of 1,130 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.29 · 2.6% (29 of 1,130 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.30 · 2.5% (28 of 1,130 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.18 · 6.5% (73 of 1,130 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.22 · 3.6% (41 of 1,130 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.24 · 2.9% (33 of 1,130 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (31 of 1,130 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.48 · 43.7% (494 of 1,130 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.45 · 23.0% (260 of 1,130 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.38 · 35.5% (401 of 1,130 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.50 · 11.4% (129 of 1,130 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.52 · 8.4% (95 of 1,130 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.41 · 20.7% (234 of 1,130 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.44 · 12.8% (145 of 1,130 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.40 · 16.7% (189 of 1,130 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.41 · 14.2% (161 of 1,130 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.39 · 16.6% (188 of 1,130 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.49 · 5.7% (64 of 1,130 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.45 · 7.2% (81 of 1,130 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.44 · 8.1% (92 of 1,130 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.29 · 39.7% (449 of 1,130 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.39 · 12.0% (136 of 1,130 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.44 · 6.5% (73 of 1,130 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.43 · 7.2% (81 of 1,130 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.40 · 9.6% (108 of 1,130 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.47 · 4.5% (51 of 1,130 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.43 · 5.6% (63 of 1,130 decks)
- Through the Forest Gate relevance 0.42 · 5.8% (66 of 1,130 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.45 · 4.5% (51 of 1,130 decks)
- Glimpse the Core relevance 0.45 · 4.4% (50 of 1,130 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.43 · 4.7% (53 of 1,130 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.41 · 4.9% (55 of 1,130 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.39 · 6.5% (73 of 1,130 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.26 · 34.9% (394 of 1,130 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.20 · 61.1% (690 of 1,130 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.39 · 6.4% (72 of 1,130 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.27 · 29.9% (338 of 1,130 decks)
- Nissa's Renewal relevance 0.47 · 3.7% (42 of 1,130 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.32 · 12.8% (145 of 1,130 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.33 · 10.8% (122 of 1,130 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.33 · 9.6% (108 of 1,130 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.33 · 8.6% (97 of 1,130 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.25 · 25.7% (290 of 1,130 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.21 · 42.6% (481 of 1,130 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.30 · 11.4% (129 of 1,130 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.28 · 13.5% (152 of 1,130 decks)
- Soul's Majesty relevance 0.34 · 5.7% (64 of 1,130 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.18 · 57.2% (646 of 1,130 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.30 · 9.6% (108 of 1,130 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.17 · 56.2% (635 of 1,130 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.31 · 6.5% (74 of 1,130 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.25 · 18.1% (205 of 1,130 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.43 · 3.2% (36 of 1,130 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.28 · 10.3% (116 of 1,130 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.14 · 70.9% (801 of 1,130 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.28 · 8.8% (99 of 1,130 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.24 · 14.9% (168 of 1,130 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (7)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.45 · 11.2% (126 of 1,130 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.41 · 11.9% (135 of 1,130 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.31 · 27.2% (307 of 1,130 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.44 · 5.1% (58 of 1,130 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.40 · 4.3% (49 of 1,130 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.32 · 9.8% (111 of 1,130 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.33 · 3.6% (41 of 1,130 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.46 · 4.7% (53 of 1,130 decks)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.29 · 3.8% (43 of 1,130 decks)
All utility lands (47)
- Ghost Town relevance 0.59 · 7.0% (79 of 1,130 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.36 · 26.9% (304 of 1,130 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.39 · 16.5% (186 of 1,130 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.49 · 5.5% (62 of 1,130 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.40 · 11.3% (128 of 1,130 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.27 · 45.0% (509 of 1,130 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.41 · 5.2% (59 of 1,130 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.39 · 7.8% (88 of 1,130 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.36 · 8.1% (92 of 1,130 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.34 · 9.1% (103 of 1,130 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.28 · 19.2% (217 of 1,130 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.41 · 4.2% (47 of 1,130 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.37 · 4.9% (55 of 1,130 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.35 · 6.6% (75 of 1,130 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.32 · 9.2% (104 of 1,130 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.36 · 4.9% (55 of 1,130 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.35 · 5.0% (56 of 1,130 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.32 · 7.6% (86 of 1,130 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.33 · 5.8% (65 of 1,130 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.22 · 26.4% (298 of 1,130 decks)
- Kazandu Mammoth // Kazandu Valley relevance 0.43 · 3.0% (34 of 1,130 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.29 · 7.3% (83 of 1,130 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.38 · 3.5% (40 of 1,130 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.29 · 6.8% (77 of 1,130 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.20 · 32.0% (362 of 1,130 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.21 · 27.3% (308 of 1,130 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.24 · 13.4% (151 of 1,130 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.23 · 14.2% (161 of 1,130 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.38 · 3.0% (34 of 1,130 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.23 · 12.8% (145 of 1,130 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.28 · 4.6% (52 of 1,130 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (100 of 1,130 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.26 · 5.8% (66 of 1,130 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (99 of 1,130 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.26 · 5.5% (62 of 1,130 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.17 · 34.4% (389 of 1,130 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.19 · 22.3% (252 of 1,130 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.35 · 3.0% (34 of 1,130 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (34 of 1,130 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.35 · 2.7% (31 of 1,130 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.29 · 3.9% (44 of 1,130 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.19 · 16.3% (184 of 1,130 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.31 · 3.1% (35 of 1,130 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (36 of 1,130 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (30 of 1,130 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (31 of 1,130 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.30 · 2.5% (28 of 1,130 decks)
All lands (31)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.44 · 30.5% (345 of 1,130 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.43 · 32.7% (369 of 1,130 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.32 · 60.1% (679 of 1,130 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.34 · 54.0% (610 of 1,130 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.49 · 16.1% (182 of 1,130 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.43 · 28.9% (327 of 1,130 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.32 · 49.6% (560 of 1,130 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.48 · 7.3% (83 of 1,130 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.50 · 5.0% (56 of 1,130 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.42 · 12.6% (142 of 1,130 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.37 · 16.6% (188 of 1,130 decks)
- Naya Panorama relevance 0.49 · 4.5% (51 of 1,130 decks)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.45 · 5.5% (62 of 1,130 decks)
- Jund Panorama relevance 0.50 · 4.2% (47 of 1,130 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.33 · 18.8% (213 of 1,130 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.33 · 19.8% (224 of 1,130 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.33 · 17.6% (199 of 1,130 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.42 · 6.3% (71 of 1,130 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.33 · 16.6% (188 of 1,130 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.29 · 20.9% (236 of 1,130 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.29 · 16.3% (184 of 1,130 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.34 · 7.3% (82 of 1,130 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.31 · 8.8% (100 of 1,130 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.31 · 7.2% (81 of 1,130 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.28 · 9.9% (112 of 1,130 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.29 · 5.5% (62 of 1,130 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.37 · 3.0% (34 of 1,130 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.20 · 15.1% (171 of 1,130 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.25 · 4.2% (47 of 1,130 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (40 of 1,130 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 94.5% (1,068 of 1,130 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer, from 1,130 real Commander decks.