Keldon Arsonist
Played in 36 Jund decks
30+23+5+1+3+7+1+8+2+
Color Identity Spread
26.5% Jund
-
Jund 36 · 26.5%
-
Naya 26 · 19.1%
-
Gruul 24 · 17.6%
-
Red 17 · 12.5%
-
Jeskai 12 · 8.8%
-
Five-Color 11 · 8.1%
- Other (7) 10 · 7.4%
Most Relevant
Army Ants 55.6% of decks
Army Ants 55.6% of decks
Boom // Bust 27.8% of decks
Boom // Bust 27.8% of decks
Titania, Protector of Argoth 55.6% of decks
Titania, Protector of Argoth 55.6% of decks
The Gitrog Monster 63.9% of decks
The Gitrog Monster 63.9% of decks
Hearthhull, the Worldseed 33.3% of decks
Hearthhull, the Worldseed 33.3% of decks
Horizon Explorer 50.0% of decks
Horizon Explorer 50.0% of decks
All most relevant (30)
- Army Ants relevance 3.06 · 55.6% (20 of 36 decks)
- Boom // Bust relevance 1.67 · 27.8% (10 of 36 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.03 · 55.6% (20 of 36 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.03 · 63.9% (23 of 36 decks)
- Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 1.01 · 33.3% (12 of 36 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.95 · 50.0% (18 of 36 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.95 · 38.9% (14 of 36 decks)
- Scouring Swarm relevance 0.94 · 38.9% (14 of 36 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.93 · 38.9% (14 of 36 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.90 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Reprocess relevance 0.88 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.87 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.86 · 50.0% (18 of 36 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.86 · 38.9% (14 of 36 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.81 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.80 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.80 · 36.1% (13 of 36 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.77 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.75 · 36.1% (13 of 36 decks)
- Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 0.75 · 36.1% (13 of 36 decks)
- Lord Windgrace relevance 0.75 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.72 · 30.6% (11 of 36 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.70 · 38.9% (14 of 36 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.69 · 30.6% (11 of 36 decks)
- Evendo Brushrazer relevance 0.66 · 30.6% (11 of 36 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.65 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.64 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Famished Worldsire relevance 0.62 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.61 · 30.6% (11 of 36 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.61 · 30.6% (11 of 36 decks)
All creatures (23)
- Army Ants relevance 3.06 · 55.6% (20 of 36 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.03 · 55.6% (20 of 36 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.03 · 63.9% (23 of 36 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.95 · 50.0% (18 of 36 decks)
- Scouring Swarm relevance 0.94 · 38.9% (14 of 36 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.86 · 38.9% (14 of 36 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.81 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.80 · 36.1% (13 of 36 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.77 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.75 · 36.1% (13 of 36 decks)
- Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 0.75 · 36.1% (13 of 36 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.70 · 38.9% (14 of 36 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 0.69 · 30.6% (11 of 36 decks)
- Evendo Brushrazer relevance 0.66 · 30.6% (11 of 36 decks)
- Famished Worldsire relevance 0.62 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.61 · 30.6% (11 of 36 decks)
- Mazirek, Kraul Death Priest relevance 0.61 · 33.3% (12 of 36 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.59 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.58 · 27.8% (10 of 36 decks)
- Braids, Arisen Nightmare relevance 0.58 · 36.1% (13 of 36 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.56 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.55 · 33.3% (12 of 36 decks)
- Korvold, Fae-Cursed King relevance 0.53 · 36.1% (13 of 36 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 1.01 · 33.3% (12 of 36 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.95 · 38.9% (14 of 36 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.90 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.87 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.72 · 30.6% (11 of 36 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Exploration relevance 0.93 · 38.9% (14 of 36 decks)
All instants (3)
- Harrow relevance 0.65 · 41.7% (15 of 36 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.61 · 30.6% (11 of 36 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.54 · 27.8% (10 of 36 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Boom // Bust relevance 1.67 · 27.8% (10 of 36 decks)
- Reprocess relevance 0.88 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.86 · 50.0% (18 of 36 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.80 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.64 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Planetary Annihilation relevance 0.59 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.52 · 25.0% (9 of 36 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Lord Windgrace relevance 0.75 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
All utility lands (8)
- Dust Bowl relevance 2.11 · 44.4% (16 of 36 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 1.25 · 47.2% (17 of 36 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 1.05 · 30.6% (11 of 36 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.97 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.90 · 22.2% (8 of 36 decks)
- Eumidian Hatchery relevance 0.83 · 38.9% (14 of 36 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.67 · 30.6% (11 of 36 decks)
- Twisted Landscape relevance 0.55 · 30.6% (11 of 36 decks)
All lands (2)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.72 · 27.8% (10 of 36 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.63 · 50.0% (18 of 36 decks)
EDH data for Keldon Arsonist: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 36 real decks.









































