Perilous Landscape
Played in 1,578 Ink-Treader decks
Color Identity Spread
3.3% Ink-Treader
- Jeskai 30,108 · 62.4%
- Yore-Tiller 10,649 · 22.1%
- Five-Color 5,622 · 11.6%
- Ink-Treader 1,578 · 3.3%
- Other (28) 305 · 0.6%
All commanders (27)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 1.57 · 8.3% (760 of 9,130 decks)
- Aragorn, the Uniter relevance 0.63 · 2.6% (342 of 13,215 decks)
- Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis relevance 0.53 · 2.3% (229 of 10,170 decks)
- Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant // Hargilde, Kindly Runechanter relevance 0.44 · 3.9% (19 of 487 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist relevance 0.42 · 5.1% (10 of 195 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.37 · 7.8% (4 of 51 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.36 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Bjorna, Nightfall Alchemist relevance 0.33 · 4.0% (8 of 201 decks)
- Mister Fantastic relevance 0.27 · 1.6% (35 of 2,142 decks)
- The Fantastic Four relevance 0.26 · 1.7% (25 of 1,446 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Yasmin Khan relevance 0.23 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Crystal, Inhuman Princess relevance 0.21 · 1.2% (42 of 3,590 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Barbara Wright relevance 0.19 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Jo Grant relevance 0.18 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
- The Thing relevance 0.16 · 1.3% (12 of 943 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Dan Lewis relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (2 of 56 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Susan Foreman relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.13 · 1.8% (4 of 218 decks)
- Power Pack relevance 0.12 · 1.7% (4 of 238 decks)
- Invisible Woman relevance 0.12 · 1.0% (10 of 984 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // K-9, Mark I relevance 0.11 · 1.8% (3 of 171 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor relevance 0.11 · 1.7% (3 of 174 decks)
- Human Torch relevance 0.11 · 1.1% (6 of 522 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.10 · 1.2% (5 of 418 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Rose Tyler relevance 0.09 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Adric, Mathematical Genius relevance 0.08 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.05 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.74 · 38.4% (606 of 1,578 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.71 · 45.2% (713 of 1,578 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.68 · 29.9% (472 of 1,578 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.67 · 30.4% (480 of 1,578 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.66 · 32.3% (509 of 1,578 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.64 · 26.1% (412 of 1,578 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.64 · 30.8% (486 of 1,578 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.63 · 33.1% (523 of 1,578 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.61 · 41.2% (650 of 1,578 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.60 · 24.9% (393 of 1,578 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.59 · 20.5% (323 of 1,578 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.58 · 24.7% (390 of 1,578 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.58 · 30.0% (474 of 1,578 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 0.57 · 24.8% (392 of 1,578 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.55 · 26.8% (423 of 1,578 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.54 · 23.1% (365 of 1,578 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 0.54 · 17.2% (272 of 1,578 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.54 · 26.8% (423 of 1,578 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.52 · 21.2% (335 of 1,578 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.52 · 19.8% (312 of 1,578 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.51 · 30.8% (486 of 1,578 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.51 · 37.3% (589 of 1,578 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.51 · 25.6% (404 of 1,578 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.51 · 22.5% (355 of 1,578 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 0.50 · 16.0% (252 of 1,578 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.49 · 18.2% (287 of 1,578 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.49 · 15.5% (244 of 1,578 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.49 · 18.1% (286 of 1,578 decks)
- Dragonback Assault relevance 0.49 · 16.2% (255 of 1,578 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.48 · 18.3% (288 of 1,578 decks)
All creatures (21)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.74 · 38.4% (606 of 1,578 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.71 · 45.2% (713 of 1,578 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.67 · 30.4% (480 of 1,578 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.66 · 32.3% (509 of 1,578 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.64 · 26.1% (412 of 1,578 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.63 · 33.1% (523 of 1,578 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.60 · 24.9% (393 of 1,578 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.58 · 30.0% (474 of 1,578 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 0.57 · 24.8% (392 of 1,578 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.55 · 26.8% (423 of 1,578 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 0.54 · 17.2% (272 of 1,578 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.54 · 26.8% (423 of 1,578 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.52 · 21.2% (335 of 1,578 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.52 · 19.8% (312 of 1,578 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.51 · 25.6% (404 of 1,578 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.51 · 22.5% (355 of 1,578 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 0.50 · 16.0% (252 of 1,578 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.49 · 15.5% (244 of 1,578 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.49 · 18.1% (286 of 1,578 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.48 · 18.3% (288 of 1,578 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.48 · 25.0% (394 of 1,578 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.49 · 18.2% (287 of 1,578 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.64 · 30.8% (486 of 1,578 decks)
- Dragonback Assault relevance 0.49 · 16.2% (255 of 1,578 decks)
All instants (4)
- Harrow relevance 0.68 · 29.9% (472 of 1,578 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.59 · 20.5% (323 of 1,578 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.54 · 23.1% (365 of 1,578 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.51 · 37.3% (589 of 1,578 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.61 · 41.2% (650 of 1,578 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.58 · 24.7% (390 of 1,578 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.51 · 30.8% (486 of 1,578 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Sheltering Landscape relevance 2.30 · 70.5% (1,113 of 1,578 decks)
- Tranquil Landscape relevance 2.30 · 71.4% (1,127 of 1,578 decks)
- Bountiful Landscape relevance 2.29 · 74.5% (1,175 of 1,578 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.64 · 24.8% (391 of 1,578 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.62 · 15.5% (245 of 1,578 decks)
All lands (14)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.79 · 52.7% (832 of 1,578 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.78 · 60.0% (947 of 1,578 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.77 · 23.7% (374 of 1,578 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.74 · 22.1% (348 of 1,578 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.61 · 15.7% (247 of 1,578 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.57 · 40.2% (635 of 1,578 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.56 · 27.7% (437 of 1,578 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.55 · 25.7% (405 of 1,578 decks)
- Boros Garrison relevance 0.55 · 20.8% (329 of 1,578 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.53 · 24.3% (383 of 1,578 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.52 · 21.9% (346 of 1,578 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.51 · 21.6% (341 of 1,578 decks)
- Mystic Monastery relevance 0.49 · 27.3% (431 of 1,578 decks)
- Frontier Bivouac relevance 0.47 · 27.4% (432 of 1,578 decks)
EDH data for Perilous Landscape: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,578 real decks.