Wall of Blossoms
Played in 1,002 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
2.5% Green
All commanders (30)
- Jolrael, Mwonvuli Recluse relevance 3.39 · 30.3% (79 of 261 decks)
- Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 2.42 · 21.8% (29 of 133 decks)
- Aeve, Progenitor Ooze relevance 2.25 · 5.2% (139 of 2,663 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 1.35 · 3.3% (33 of 987 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 1.13 · 2.2% (35 of 1,601 decks)
- Varis, Silverymoon Ranger relevance 1.06 · 4.1% (12 of 294 decks)
- Kaysa relevance 0.99 · 7.1% (6 of 85 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.91 · 1.8% (23 of 1,266 decks)
- Sasaya, Orochi Ascendant // Sasaya's Essence relevance 0.90 · 2.2% (16 of 712 decks)
- Polukranos, World Eater relevance 0.87 · 8.5% (4 of 47 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 0.80 · 3.0% (8 of 264 decks)
- Multani, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.71 · 2.3% (8 of 346 decks)
- Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary relevance 0.71 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Pia, Aether Ascetic relevance 0.71 · 1.7% (12 of 709 decks)
- Grunn, the Lonely King relevance 0.69 · 2.2% (8 of 363 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 0.68 · 6.3% (3 of 48 decks)
- Mona Lisa, Science Geek relevance 0.65 · 2.5% (6 of 241 decks)
- Yorvo, Lord of Garenbrig relevance 0.64 · 1.7% (9 of 532 decks)
- Arasta of the Endless Web relevance 0.60 · 2.5% (5 of 197 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.60 · 1.0% (17 of 1,661 decks)
- Baru, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.57 · 4.0% (3 of 75 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.51 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.50 · 2.9% (3 of 102 decks)
- Radagast the Brown relevance 0.48 · 1.1% (8 of 724 decks)
- Oviya Pashiri, Sage Lifecrafter relevance 0.47 · 1.3% (6 of 449 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.46 · 4.3% (2 of 47 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.44 · 1.1% (7 of 663 decks)
- Silvos, Rogue Elemental relevance 0.43 · 3.6% (2 of 55 decks)
- Doorman relevance 0.41 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.41 · 1.9% (3 of 156 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.56 · 49.3% (494 of 1,002 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 1.00 · 29.6% (297 of 1,002 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.63 · 34.8% (349 of 1,002 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.61 · 21.8% (218 of 1,002 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.61 · 41.2% (413 of 1,002 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.60 · 23.6% (236 of 1,002 decks)
- Wall of Roots relevance 0.60 · 10.9% (109 of 1,002 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.59 · 20.6% (206 of 1,002 decks)
- Carven Caryatid relevance 0.56 · 8.8% (88 of 1,002 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.55 · 31.3% (314 of 1,002 decks)
- Multani's Acolyte relevance 0.55 · 8.6% (86 of 1,002 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.55 · 14.2% (142 of 1,002 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.52 · 31.7% (318 of 1,002 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.52 · 13.5% (135 of 1,002 decks)
- Generous Stray relevance 0.51 · 8.5% (85 of 1,002 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.50 · 33.8% (339 of 1,002 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.48 · 29.5% (296 of 1,002 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.48 · 17.8% (178 of 1,002 decks)
- Insidious Fungus relevance 0.47 · 14.2% (142 of 1,002 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.46 · 38.1% (382 of 1,002 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.46 · 29.1% (292 of 1,002 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.46 · 36.0% (361 of 1,002 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.43 · 17.8% (178 of 1,002 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.43 · 18.8% (188 of 1,002 decks)
- Regal Force relevance 0.40 · 15.7% (157 of 1,002 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.40 · 15.6% (156 of 1,002 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.40 · 11.4% (114 of 1,002 decks)
- Runic Armasaur relevance 0.40 · 9.8% (98 of 1,002 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.39 · 11.7% (117 of 1,002 decks)
- Spore Frog relevance 0.39 · 11.8% (118 of 1,002 decks)
All creatures (34)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.56 · 49.3% (494 of 1,002 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 1.00 · 29.6% (297 of 1,002 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.63 · 34.8% (349 of 1,002 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.61 · 21.8% (218 of 1,002 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.61 · 41.2% (413 of 1,002 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.60 · 23.6% (236 of 1,002 decks)
- Wall of Roots relevance 0.60 · 10.9% (109 of 1,002 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.59 · 20.6% (206 of 1,002 decks)
- Carven Caryatid relevance 0.56 · 8.8% (88 of 1,002 decks)
- Multani's Acolyte relevance 0.55 · 8.6% (86 of 1,002 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.55 · 14.2% (142 of 1,002 decks)
- Generous Stray relevance 0.51 · 8.5% (85 of 1,002 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.48 · 29.5% (296 of 1,002 decks)
- Scavenging Ooze relevance 0.48 · 17.8% (178 of 1,002 decks)
- Insidious Fungus relevance 0.47 · 14.2% (142 of 1,002 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.46 · 38.1% (382 of 1,002 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.46 · 29.1% (292 of 1,002 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.46 · 36.0% (361 of 1,002 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.43 · 17.8% (178 of 1,002 decks)
- Karametra's Acolyte relevance 0.43 · 18.8% (188 of 1,002 decks)
- Regal Force relevance 0.40 · 15.7% (157 of 1,002 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.40 · 15.6% (156 of 1,002 decks)
- Primordial Sage relevance 0.40 · 11.4% (114 of 1,002 decks)
- Runic Armasaur relevance 0.40 · 9.8% (98 of 1,002 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.39 · 11.7% (117 of 1,002 decks)
- Spore Frog relevance 0.39 · 11.8% (118 of 1,002 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.39 · 15.6% (156 of 1,002 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.37 · 11.5% (115 of 1,002 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.37 · 10.1% (101 of 1,002 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.36 · 6.8% (68 of 1,002 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 0.36 · 5.6% (56 of 1,002 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 0.35 · 10.6% (106 of 1,002 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.35 · 17.0% (170 of 1,002 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.35 · 10.5% (105 of 1,002 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.38 · 15.1% (151 of 1,002 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.55 · 31.3% (314 of 1,002 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.39 · 20.9% (209 of 1,002 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.37 · 26.0% (261 of 1,002 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.36 · 9.8% (98 of 1,002 decks)
All instants (1)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.35 · 8.4% (84 of 1,002 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Explore relevance 0.52 · 31.7% (318 of 1,002 decks)
- Glimpse of Nature relevance 0.52 · 13.5% (135 of 1,002 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.50 · 33.8% (339 of 1,002 decks)
- Abundant Harvest relevance 0.39 · 8.8% (88 of 1,002 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.37 · 22.1% (221 of 1,002 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.36 · 13.3% (133 of 1,002 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.53 · 22.4% (224 of 1,002 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.44 · 11.9% (119 of 1,002 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.41 · 10.7% (107 of 1,002 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.36 · 21.0% (210 of 1,002 decks)
EDH data for Wall of Blossoms: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,002 real decks.