Color Identity Spread
4.6% Ink-Treader
230+35+2+6+1+2+4+
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.11 · 7.3% (654 of 9,012 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.33 · 68.8% (506 of 736 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.26 · 66.2% (487 of 736 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.26 · 51.1% (376 of 736 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.25 · 46.2% (340 of 736 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.22 · 61.1% (450 of 736 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.21 · 64.0% (471 of 736 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.21 · 63.2% (465 of 736 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.19 · 75.7% (557 of 736 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.18 · 57.2% (421 of 736 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.13 · 47.0% (346 of 736 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 1.12 · 37.5% (276 of 736 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.12 · 54.2% (399 of 736 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.09 · 53.5% (394 of 736 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 1.08 · 34.0% (250 of 736 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.08 · 46.5% (342 of 736 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.05 · 45.5% (335 of 736 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.03 · 45.8% (337 of 736 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 1.01 · 27.7% (204 of 736 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 1.00 · 29.8% (219 of 736 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.00 · 44.2% (325 of 736 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.99 · 45.1% (332 of 736 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.98 · 58.3% (429 of 736 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.98 · 38.7% (285 of 736 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.97 · 36.5% (269 of 736 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.95 · 46.6% (343 of 736 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.90 · 45.2% (333 of 736 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.84 · 30.4% (224 of 736 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 0.83 · 20.4% (150 of 736 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.83 · 30.7% (226 of 736 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.82 · 29.2% (215 of 736 decks)
All creatures (35)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.33 · 68.8% (506 of 736 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.26 · 66.2% (487 of 736 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.26 · 51.1% (376 of 736 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.25 · 46.2% (340 of 736 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.22 · 61.1% (450 of 736 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.21 · 64.0% (471 of 736 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.21 · 63.2% (465 of 736 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.19 · 75.7% (557 of 736 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.18 · 57.2% (421 of 736 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.13 · 47.0% (346 of 736 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 1.12 · 37.5% (276 of 736 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.09 · 53.5% (394 of 736 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 1.08 · 34.0% (250 of 736 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.08 · 46.5% (342 of 736 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.05 · 45.5% (335 of 736 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 1.00 · 29.8% (219 of 736 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.00 · 44.2% (325 of 736 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.99 · 45.1% (332 of 736 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.98 · 58.3% (429 of 736 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.98 · 38.7% (285 of 736 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.97 · 36.5% (269 of 736 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.90 · 45.2% (333 of 736 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.84 · 30.4% (224 of 736 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 0.83 · 20.4% (150 of 736 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.82 · 29.2% (215 of 736 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.81 · 27.4% (202 of 736 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.80 · 29.1% (214 of 736 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.77 · 30.0% (221 of 736 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.77 · 23.2% (171 of 736 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.77 · 22.4% (165 of 736 decks)
- Geode Rager relevance 0.76 · 23.1% (170 of 736 decks)
- Ruin Ghost relevance 0.74 · 19.6% (144 of 736 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.73 · 19.3% (142 of 736 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.72 · 29.3% (216 of 736 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.71 · 23.8% (175 of 736 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 1.01 · 27.7% (204 of 736 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.83 · 30.7% (226 of 736 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.12 · 54.2% (399 of 736 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.95 · 46.6% (343 of 736 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.78 · 22.7% (167 of 736 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.78 · 27.7% (204 of 736 decks)
- Dragonback Assault relevance 0.77 · 25.5% (188 of 736 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.76 · 22.6% (166 of 736 decks)
All instants (1)
- Harrow relevance 1.03 · 45.8% (337 of 736 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.71 · 20.4% (150 of 736 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.71 · 27.4% (202 of 736 decks)
All lands (4)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.98 · 48.9% (360 of 736 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.89 · 41.7% (307 of 736 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.81 · 37.2% (274 of 736 decks)
- Boros Garrison relevance 0.73 · 27.6% (203 of 736 decks)
EDH data for Zell Dincht: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 736 real decks.






































