Cards like Seek the Horizon
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
85% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
62% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other green decks
Cards
- Seek the Horizon 71%
- Rites of Spring 59%
- Sylvan Scrying 15%
- Scouting Trek 12%
- Lay of the Land 12%
- Reclaim the Wastes 3%
Other options: Fork in the Road, Attune with Aether, Thirsting Roots
Cards like You Happen On a Glade
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
59% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Sylvan Ranger
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
- Sylvan Ranger 41%
- Gatecreeper Vine 18%
- Borderland Ranger 9%
- Pilgrim's Eye 6%
- Environmental Scientist 6%
- District Guide 3%
- Farfinder 3%
- Skittering Surveyor 3%
Other options: Loam Larva, Borderland Explorer, Jungle Wayfinder, Changeling Wayfinder, Giant Ladybug, Civic Wayfinder
Cards like Mulch
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards
- Mulch 44%
- Winding Way 29%
Other options: Scout the Borders, In the Presence of Ages, Relentless Pursuit
Cards like Journey of Discovery
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
76% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other green decks
Cards
- Journey of Discovery 71%
- Summer Bloom 26%
- Explore 9%
Cards like Wakeroot Elemental
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.85 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
3.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Hurricane
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards like Armillary Sphere
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
- Armillary Sphere 59%
- Wanderer's Twig 9%
- Renegade Map 6%
- Traveler's Amulet 3%
- World Map 3%
- Expedition Map 3%
Other options: Wayfarer's Bauble, Moonsilver Key, Keys to the House, Braidwood Sextant, Ominous Parcel
Cards like Eternal Witness
3.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
- Eternal Witness 35%
- Timeless Witness 18%
Other options: Greenwarden of Murasa, Elvish Regrower, Deadwood Treefolk, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Goblin Cannon
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards like Jadelight Spelunker
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Merfolk Branchwalker, Pathfinding Axejaw, Ixalli's Diviner, Tishana's Wayfinder, River Herald Guide, Cenote Scout
Cards like Magus of the Candelabra
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Seer's Sundial
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
- Seer's Sundial 24%
- Horn of Greed 12%
Cards like Nissa, Who Shakes the World
6.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivator Colossus
2.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Krosan Tusker
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
- Krosan Tusker 29%
- Shefet Monitor 3%
Cards like Vorinclex // The Grand Evolution
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards like Kenrith's Transformation
5.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Thought Vessel
4.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Oracle of Mul Daya
1.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other green decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- You Happen On a Glade relevance 0.46 · 79.4% (27 of 34 decks)
- Nantuko Cultivator relevance 0.51 · 61.8% (21 of 34 decks)
- Sprouting Vines relevance 0.50 · 61.8% (21 of 34 decks)
- Armillary Sphere relevance 0.51 · 58.8% (20 of 34 decks)
- Seek the Horizon relevance 0.45 · 70.6% (24 of 34 decks)
- Dryad Greenseeker relevance 0.50 · 55.9% (19 of 34 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.42 · 70.6% (24 of 34 decks)
- Rites of Spring relevance 0.47 · 58.8% (20 of 34 decks)
- Wakeroot Elemental relevance 0.45 · 61.8% (21 of 34 decks)
- Gaea's Bounty relevance 0.50 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
- Nissa's Triumph relevance 0.40 · 67.6% (23 of 34 decks)
- Magus of the Library relevance 0.50 · 44.1% (15 of 34 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.36 · 76.5% (26 of 34 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 0.41 · 52.9% (18 of 34 decks)
- Gelatinous Genesis relevance 0.45 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
- Jadelight Spelunker relevance 0.46 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.37 · 61.8% (21 of 34 decks)
- Polukranos, World Eater relevance 0.47 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.38 · 55.9% (19 of 34 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.42 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.28 · 82.4% (28 of 34 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.37 · 52.9% (18 of 34 decks)
- Wild-Field Scarecrow relevance 0.46 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Rowen relevance 0.44 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.45 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.37 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Mana relevance 0.33 · 55.9% (19 of 34 decks)
- Ant Queen relevance 0.43 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.31 · 64.7% (22 of 34 decks)
- Endless Atlas relevance 0.37 · 44.1% (15 of 34 decks)
- Wolfbriar Elemental relevance 0.42 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.35 · 44.1% (15 of 34 decks)
- Horizon Spellbomb relevance 0.42 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Silvanus's Invoker relevance 0.40 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Credit Voucher relevance 0.41 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.26 · 64.7% (22 of 34 decks)
- Goblin Cannon relevance 0.40 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Killer Bees relevance 0.40 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.35 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Khalni Gem relevance 0.37 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.34 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Journeyer's Kite relevance 0.39 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.35 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Squall Line relevance 0.36 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Elfhame Sanctuary relevance 0.38 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Lost in the Woods relevance 0.35 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 0.37 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 0.33 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Tower of Fortunes relevance 0.37 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Soul of New Phyrexia relevance 0.36 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Nantuko Cultivator relevance 0.51 · 61.8% (21 of 34 decks)
- Dryad Greenseeker relevance 0.50 · 55.9% (19 of 34 decks)
- Wakeroot Elemental relevance 0.45 · 61.8% (21 of 34 decks)
- Magus of the Library relevance 0.50 · 44.1% (15 of 34 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.36 · 76.5% (26 of 34 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 0.41 · 52.9% (18 of 34 decks)
- Jadelight Spelunker relevance 0.46 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.37 · 61.8% (21 of 34 decks)
- Polukranos, World Eater relevance 0.47 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.42 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.37 · 52.9% (18 of 34 decks)
- Wild-Field Scarecrow relevance 0.46 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.45 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Mana relevance 0.33 · 55.9% (19 of 34 decks)
- Ant Queen relevance 0.43 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Wolfbriar Elemental relevance 0.42 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Silvanus's Invoker relevance 0.40 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Killer Bees relevance 0.40 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 0.37 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Soul of New Phyrexia relevance 0.36 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Verdeloth the Ancient relevance 0.34 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Greenseeker relevance 0.34 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Jade Mage relevance 0.35 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Fa'adiyah Seer relevance 0.33 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Nemata, Grove Guardian relevance 0.31 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Realm Seekers relevance 0.30 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.25 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Almighty Brushwagg relevance 0.30 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 0.27 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Borderland Ranger relevance 0.29 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.16 · 58.8% (20 of 34 decks)
- Beastrider Vanguard relevance 0.26 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.22 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Vorinclex // The Grand Evolution relevance 0.21 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Boseiju Reaches Skyward // Branch of Boseiju relevance 0.22 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Pilgrim's Eye relevance 0.26 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Wildheart Invoker relevance 0.26 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Jadelight Ranger relevance 0.26 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Rampaging Yao Guai relevance 0.22 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Guardian Augmenter relevance 0.21 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.20 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Bloomvine Regent // Claim Territory relevance 0.20 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Seeker of Sunlight relevance 0.23 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Termagant Swarm relevance 0.23 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Zenith Chronicler relevance 0.22 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Timeless Witness relevance 0.17 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.20 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Environmental Scientist relevance 0.20 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.15 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Dosan the Falling Leaf relevance 0.18 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Armillary Sphere relevance 0.51 · 58.8% (20 of 34 decks)
- Endless Atlas relevance 0.37 · 44.1% (15 of 34 decks)
- Horizon Spellbomb relevance 0.42 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Credit Voucher relevance 0.41 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Goblin Cannon relevance 0.40 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Khalni Gem relevance 0.37 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.34 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Journeyer's Kite relevance 0.39 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Tower of Fortunes relevance 0.37 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Sands of Delirium relevance 0.36 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.30 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Well of Knowledge relevance 0.32 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Orochi Hatchery relevance 0.32 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Horizon Stone relevance 0.30 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.25 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Storm Cauldron relevance 0.28 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Wanderer's Twig relevance 0.29 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Planar Portal relevance 0.28 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.23 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Planar Bridge relevance 0.26 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Candelabra of Tawnos relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Rocket Launcher relevance 0.25 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Renegade Map relevance 0.25 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.23 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.18 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Skyship Weatherlight relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Monument to Perfection relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Serum Powder relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Diviner's Wand relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Aladdin's Lamp relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Citanul Flute relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Scroll of Origins relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Snake Basket relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Reckoner Bankbuster relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Shield of the Ages relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Library of Leng relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Collector's Vault relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Brainstone relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Eye of Vecna relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Mighty Servant of Leuk-o relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Bag of Holding relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.13 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Mazemind Tome relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.12 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Ring of Three Wishes relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Fountainport Bell relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Eternity Vessel relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Traveler's Amulet relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.38 · 55.9% (19 of 34 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.28 · 82.4% (28 of 34 decks)
- Rowen relevance 0.44 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Elfhame Sanctuary relevance 0.38 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Lost in the Woods relevance 0.35 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Manabond relevance 0.28 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.23 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.22 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.20 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Centaur Glade relevance 0.26 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Into the Wilds relevance 0.23 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Hall of Gemstone relevance 0.18 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Elephant Grass relevance 0.19 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Saproling Cluster relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.15 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.12 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Perilous Forays relevance 0.15 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.12 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Call of the Wild relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Vernal Bloom relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.12 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.12 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.10 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Gravity Well relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Compost relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.10 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.10 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Crawling Sensation relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.10 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Ayula's Influence relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Path of Discovery relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Seal of Primordium relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.06 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.06 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.05 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.05 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.05 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
All instants (49)
- You Happen On a Glade relevance 0.46 · 79.4% (27 of 34 decks)
- Sprouting Vines relevance 0.50 · 61.8% (21 of 34 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.35 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Squall Line relevance 0.36 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 0.32 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Regenesis relevance 0.29 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Pair o' Dice Lost relevance 0.25 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.21 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Sprout Swarm relevance 0.23 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.16 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.17 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.15 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.13 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.16 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Strength of the Tajuru relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Nourishing Shoal relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.13 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.12 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Appetite for the Unnatural relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.13 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.13 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.12 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Deglamer relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Reap relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Reach of Branches relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Wilt relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Barrier Breach relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.10 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.10 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.09 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.08 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.09 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.09 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.06 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.07 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.05 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.04 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.05 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.04 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.03 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Seek the Horizon relevance 0.45 · 70.6% (24 of 34 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.42 · 70.6% (24 of 34 decks)
- Rites of Spring relevance 0.47 · 58.8% (20 of 34 decks)
- Gaea's Bounty relevance 0.50 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
- Nissa's Triumph relevance 0.40 · 67.6% (23 of 34 decks)
- Gelatinous Genesis relevance 0.45 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.37 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.31 · 64.7% (22 of 34 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.35 · 44.1% (15 of 34 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.26 · 64.7% (22 of 34 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.35 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 0.33 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Wurmcalling relevance 0.36 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Wildest Dreams relevance 0.33 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.22 · 50.0% (17 of 34 decks)
- Creeping Renaissance relevance 0.29 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Abundant Harvest relevance 0.27 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Scouting Trek relevance 0.28 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Lay of the Land relevance 0.28 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.25 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.25 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Dryad's Revival relevance 0.24 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.22 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 0.24 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.23 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Enshrined Memories relevance 0.27 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (17 of 34 decks)
- Uncage the Menagerie relevance 0.25 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- The Great Aurora relevance 0.23 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.19 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.15 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Nostalgic Dreams relevance 0.21 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Formless Genesis relevance 0.20 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.11 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
- Howl of the Night Pack relevance 0.17 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Elven Cache relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Tranquil Path relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Savage Conception relevance 0.18 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.14 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Stream of Life relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Audience with Trostani relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Deconstruct relevance 0.17 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.13 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.09 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
- Glistening Dawn relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.13 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Under the Skin relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.14 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Parallel Evolution relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Bygone Marvels relevance 0.14 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (11)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.24 · 50.0% (17 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.21 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.17 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Vivien on the Hunt relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.10 · 17.6% (6 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Genesis Mage relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Blasted Landscape relevance 0.30 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.25 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.25 · 20.6% (7 of 34 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.18 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Scrying Sheets relevance 0.24 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.15 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.18 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.17 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Fertile Thicket relevance 0.18 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Jasmine Dragon Tea Shop relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Dungeon Descent relevance 0.16 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.12 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Mirrex relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Big Apple, 3 a.m. relevance 0.13 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Underdark Rift relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Mariposa Military Base relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.09 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Mystifying Maze relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Access Tunnel relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Labyrinth of Skophos relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Chocobo Camp relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 0.11 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.10 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.09 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.09 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Ghost Town relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.07 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.08 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.07 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.06 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.06 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Roiling Canopy relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.06 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.05 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.05 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.05 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.05 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.04 · 8.8% (3 of 34 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.05 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.04 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.04 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.04 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.04 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (20)
- Thaumatic Compass // Spires of Orazca relevance 0.32 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.17 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.13 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.12 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Thawing Glaciers relevance 0.12 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.09 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.08 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.05 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.06 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.05 · 11.8% (4 of 34 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.05 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.05 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.05 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.04 · 5.9% (2 of 34 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.04 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.04 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.02 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.02 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.02 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.00 · 91.2% (31 of 34 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Sasaya, Orochi Ascendant // Sasaya's Essence, from 34 real Commander decks.