Cards like Seek the Horizon
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
55% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other green decks
Cards
- Seek the Horizon 69%
- Rites of Spring 45%
- Sylvan Scrying 17%
- Scouting Trek 10%
- Lay of the Land 7%
- Thirsting Roots 3%
- Reclaim the Wastes 3%
Other options: Fork in the Road, Attune with Aether
Cards like You Happen On a Glade
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
83% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Mulch
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards
- Mulch 48%
- Winding Way 34%
Other options: Scout the Borders, In the Presence of Ages, Relentless Pursuit
Cards like Sylvan Ranger
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards
- Sylvan Ranger 31%
- Gatecreeper Vine 14%
- Borderland Ranger 14%
- District Guide 10%
- Environmental Scientist 10%
- Pilgrim's Eye 7%
- Civic Wayfinder 7%
- Farfinder 3%
- Skittering Surveyor 3%
Other options: Loam Larva, Borderland Explorer, Jungle Wayfinder, Changeling Wayfinder, Giant Ladybug
Cards like Wakeroot Elemental
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Squall Line
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards like Journey of Discovery
13× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other green decks
Cards
- Journey of Discovery 83%
- Summer Bloom 14%
- Explore 7%
Cards like Eternal Witness
6.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Elvish Regrower, Deadwood Treefolk, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Traverse the Ulvenwald
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Jadelight Spelunker
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Merfolk Branchwalker, Pathfinding Axejaw, Ixalli's Diviner, Tishana's Wayfinder, River Herald Guide, Cenote Scout
Cards like Armillary Sphere
18× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
- Armillary Sphere 41%
- Expedition Map 14%
- World Map 7%
- Moonsilver Key 3%
- Traveler's Amulet 3%
- Keys to the House 3%
- Braidwood Sextant 3%
- Ominous Parcel 3%
- Renegade Map 3%
- Wanderer's Twig 3%
Other options: Wayfarer's Bauble
Cards like Dryad's Revival
4.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other green decks
Cards
- Dryad's Revival 21%
- Creeping Renaissance 10%
- Regrowth 7%
Other options: Unnatural Restoration, Revive, Nature's Spiral, Recollect, Elven Cache
Cards like Krosan Tusker
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other green decks
Cards
- Krosan Tusker 28%
- Shefet Monitor 3%
Cards like Magus of the Candelabra
20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Heroic Intervention
1.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 53% of other green decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Seer's Sundial
12× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
- Seer's Sundial 21%
- Horn of Greed 7%
Cards like Thought Vessel
5.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Fog
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other green decks
Cards
- Fog 17%
- Lull 7%
- Moment's Peace 3%
Other options: Hunter's Ambush, Thwart the Enemy, Hindervines, Tanglesap, Pause for Reflection, Terrifying Presence, Root Snare, Serene Sunset, Winds of Qal Sisma, Haze of Pollen, Vine Snare
All top picks (50)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.47 · 82.8% (24 of 29 decks)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.41 · 89.7% (26 of 29 decks)
- You Happen On a Glade relevance 0.45 · 72.4% (21 of 29 decks)
- Seek the Horizon relevance 0.45 · 69.0% (20 of 29 decks)
- Nantuko Cultivator relevance 0.50 · 48.3% (14 of 29 decks)
- Gaea's Bounty relevance 0.48 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Armillary Sphere relevance 0.49 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)
- Rites of Spring relevance 0.48 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Nissa's Triumph relevance 0.41 · 58.6% (17 of 29 decks)
- Sprouting Vines relevance 0.47 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Magus of the Library relevance 0.46 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Dryad Greenseeker relevance 0.47 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.41 · 48.3% (14 of 29 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.35 · 65.5% (19 of 29 decks)
- Wild-Field Scarecrow relevance 0.48 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.34 · 62.1% (18 of 29 decks)
- Gelatinous Genesis relevance 0.40 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Jadelight Spelunker relevance 0.43 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 0.31 · 62.1% (18 of 29 decks)
- Wakeroot Elemental relevance 0.40 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Khalni Gem relevance 0.41 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.41 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.38 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Rowen relevance 0.40 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.28 · 62.1% (18 of 29 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.33 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Ant Queen relevance 0.38 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.30 · 51.7% (15 of 29 decks)
- Squall Line relevance 0.34 · 37.9% (11 of 29 decks)
- Verdeloth the Ancient relevance 0.36 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Fa'adiyah Seer relevance 0.39 · 20.7% (6 of 29 decks)
- Killer Bees relevance 0.39 · 20.7% (6 of 29 decks)
- Credit Voucher relevance 0.41 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.29 · 48.3% (14 of 29 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.25 · 65.5% (19 of 29 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.30 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)
- Polukranos, World Eater relevance 0.32 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.33 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Wildest Dreams relevance 0.35 · 24.1% (7 of 29 decks)
- Silvanus's Invoker relevance 0.36 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Orochi Hatchery relevance 0.36 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Journeyer's Kite relevance 0.36 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.29 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Wolfbriar Elemental relevance 0.32 · 24.1% (7 of 29 decks)
- Endless Atlas relevance 0.31 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Realm Seekers relevance 0.33 · 20.7% (6 of 29 decks)
- Elfhame Sanctuary relevance 0.34 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Almighty Brushwagg relevance 0.35 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Regenesis relevance 0.35 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Planar Portal relevance 0.33 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Yavimaya Elder relevance 0.41 · 89.7% (26 of 29 decks)
- Nantuko Cultivator relevance 0.50 · 48.3% (14 of 29 decks)
- Magus of the Library relevance 0.46 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Dryad Greenseeker relevance 0.47 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)
- Wild-Field Scarecrow relevance 0.48 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Jadelight Spelunker relevance 0.43 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 0.31 · 62.1% (18 of 29 decks)
- Wakeroot Elemental relevance 0.40 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.41 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.33 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Ant Queen relevance 0.38 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Verdeloth the Ancient relevance 0.36 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Killer Bees relevance 0.39 · 20.7% (6 of 29 decks)
- Fa'adiyah Seer relevance 0.39 · 20.7% (6 of 29 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.30 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)
- Polukranos, World Eater relevance 0.32 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Sylvan Ranger relevance 0.33 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Silvanus's Invoker relevance 0.36 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.29 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Wolfbriar Elemental relevance 0.32 · 24.1% (7 of 29 decks)
- Realm Seekers relevance 0.33 · 20.7% (6 of 29 decks)
- Almighty Brushwagg relevance 0.35 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Jade Mage relevance 0.33 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Borderland Ranger relevance 0.34 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 0.33 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Soul of New Phyrexia relevance 0.30 · 20.7% (6 of 29 decks)
- Ursapine relevance 0.31 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Loamcrafter Faun relevance 0.29 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- District Guide relevance 0.30 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Seeker of Sunlight relevance 0.29 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Jadelight Ranger relevance 0.29 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Greenseeker relevance 0.27 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.19 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Environmental Scientist relevance 0.26 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Mana relevance 0.22 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Wildheart Invoker relevance 0.26 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Unyaro Bees relevance 0.27 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Timeless Witness relevance 0.21 · 24.1% (7 of 29 decks)
- Nemata, Grove Guardian relevance 0.24 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Pilgrim's Eye relevance 0.26 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Boseiju Reaches Skyward // Branch of Boseiju relevance 0.22 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Six relevance 0.19 · 31.0% (9 of 29 decks)
- Budoka Gardener // Dokai, Weaver of Life relevance 0.23 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Patron of the Orochi relevance 0.22 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 0.19 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Rampaging Yao Guai relevance 0.19 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Civic Wayfinder relevance 0.21 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Guardian Augmenter relevance 0.18 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Lifeblood Hydra relevance 0.18 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Termagant Swarm relevance 0.20 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Armillary Sphere relevance 0.49 · 41.4% (12 of 29 decks)
- Khalni Gem relevance 0.41 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Credit Voucher relevance 0.41 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Orochi Hatchery relevance 0.36 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Journeyer's Kite relevance 0.36 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Endless Atlas relevance 0.31 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Planar Portal relevance 0.33 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Horizon Spellbomb relevance 0.31 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Tower of Fortunes relevance 0.29 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.25 · 20.7% (6 of 29 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.25 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Brainstone relevance 0.26 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Snake Basket relevance 0.26 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.21 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.17 · 20.7% (6 of 29 decks)
- Storm Cauldron relevance 0.21 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.17 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.20 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.17 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.18 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Arc Reactor relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Braidwood Sextant relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Ominous Parcel relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Sunset Pyramid relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Wanderer's Twig relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Keys to the House relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Aladdin's Lamp relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Renegade Map relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Rocket Launcher relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Campfire relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Bag of Holding relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Whetstone relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Goblin Cannon relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Book of Rass relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Diviner's Wand relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Anvil of Bogardan relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Sands of Delirium relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Mindslaver relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.13 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Well of Knowledge relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Traveler's Amulet relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Fountainport Bell relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Dino DNA relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Mesmeric Orb relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Heirloom Epic relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Candelabra of Tawnos relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Coveted Jewel relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Ring of Three Wishes relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Rowen relevance 0.40 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.28 · 62.1% (18 of 29 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.29 · 48.3% (14 of 29 decks)
- Elfhame Sanctuary relevance 0.34 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Lost in the Woods relevance 0.32 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.25 · 24.1% (7 of 29 decks)
- Centaur Glade relevance 0.28 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.22 · 24.1% (7 of 29 decks)
- Manabond relevance 0.21 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.14 · 24.1% (7 of 29 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.15 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.12 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.14 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Seed the Land relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Hall of Gemstone relevance 0.15 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Multani's Presence relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Dense Canopy relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Saproling Cluster relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.12 · 20.7% (6 of 29 decks)
- The Huntsman's Redemption relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Down in the Valley relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Crawling Sensation relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Epic Struggle relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.11 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Primal Order relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Into the Wilds relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.10 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Perilous Forays relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Recycle relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.11 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Gravity Well relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Ayula's Influence relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.10 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.09 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Earthcraft relevance 0.09 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.09 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Nature's Will relevance 0.09 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.08 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.08 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Vernal Bloom relevance 0.07 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.06 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.06 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.06 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.06 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.05 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.05 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.05 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.05 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.05 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
All instants (50)
- You Happen On a Glade relevance 0.45 · 72.4% (21 of 29 decks)
- Sprouting Vines relevance 0.47 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Squall Line relevance 0.34 · 37.9% (11 of 29 decks)
- Regenesis relevance 0.35 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.30 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 0.26 · 20.7% (6 of 29 decks)
- Pair o' Dice Lost relevance 0.27 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Reap relevance 0.26 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Nourishing Shoal relevance 0.24 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.19 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Go Forth relevance 0.20 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.18 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.15 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.16 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.14 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Tel-Jilad Defiance relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.15 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.16 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Cobra Trap relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.14 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Something Worth Saving relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.13 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Verdant Rebirth relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Sarkhan's Resolve relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Strength of the Tajuru relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.11 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Skyshroud Blessing relevance 0.14 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.10 · 20.7% (6 of 29 decks)
- Warriors' Lesson relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Weather the Storm relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Reach of Branches relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.09 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Once and Future relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Respite relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.10 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.08 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.08 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.09 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.09 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Elemental Teachings relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Avoid Fate relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Peerless Recycling relevance 0.09 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Infectious Bite relevance 0.09 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.09 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.09 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.47 · 82.8% (24 of 29 decks)
- Seek the Horizon relevance 0.45 · 69.0% (20 of 29 decks)
- Gaea's Bounty relevance 0.48 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Rites of Spring relevance 0.48 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Nissa's Triumph relevance 0.41 · 58.6% (17 of 29 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.41 · 48.3% (14 of 29 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.35 · 65.5% (19 of 29 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.34 · 62.1% (18 of 29 decks)
- Gelatinous Genesis relevance 0.40 · 44.8% (13 of 29 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.38 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.25 · 65.5% (19 of 29 decks)
- Wildest Dreams relevance 0.35 · 24.1% (7 of 29 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.30 · 24.1% (7 of 29 decks)
- Wurmcalling relevance 0.32 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Hurricane relevance 0.27 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.27 · 27.6% (8 of 29 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.24 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Dryad's Revival relevance 0.27 · 20.7% (6 of 29 decks)
- Nostalgic Dreams relevance 0.30 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Uncage the Menagerie relevance 0.28 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.18 · 51.7% (15 of 29 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.24 · 20.7% (6 of 29 decks)
- Scouting Trek relevance 0.27 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.20 · 34.5% (10 of 29 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.23 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Endless Swarm relevance 0.26 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- The Great Aurora relevance 0.23 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.15 · 51.7% (15 of 29 decks)
- Enshrined Memories relevance 0.24 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Creeping Renaissance relevance 0.22 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Formless Genesis relevance 0.23 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.19 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Caravan Vigil relevance 0.22 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 0.20 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Abundant Harvest relevance 0.20 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.19 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.19 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Many Partings relevance 0.19 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Valgavoth's Onslaught relevance 0.21 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Lay of the Land relevance 0.20 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.16 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Over the Edge relevance 0.18 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Verdant Mastery relevance 0.18 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Seasons Past relevance 0.17 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Tranquil Path relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Savage Conception relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.14 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 0.16 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Audience with Trostani relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.13 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (8)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.30 · 51.7% (15 of 29 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.19 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.14 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Vivien on the Hunt relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.08 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.08 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.06 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.06 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
All utility lands (45)
- Blasted Landscape relevance 0.31 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.22 · 20.7% (6 of 29 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.22 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.15 · 24.1% (7 of 29 decks)
- Labyrinth of Skophos relevance 0.18 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 0.17 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.14 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Dungeon Descent relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- The Great Mound relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.10 · 37.9% (11 of 29 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.14 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.12 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Mariposa Military Base relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Capital City relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Mystifying Maze relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.11 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.10 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Drownyard Temple relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Ominous Cemetery relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Ghost Town relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.10 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.07 · 20.7% (6 of 29 decks)
- Petrified Field relevance 0.09 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.08 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.09 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.08 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.08 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.07 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.08 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.08 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.08 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.06 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.07 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.05 · 10.3% (3 of 29 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.05 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.06 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.05 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.05 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.05 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.04 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.04 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.03 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (18)
- Thaumatic Compass // Spires of Orazca relevance 0.33 · 17.2% (5 of 29 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.11 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.13 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.10 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.10 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.12 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.10 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.10 · 13.8% (4 of 29 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.11 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.09 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.07 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.06 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.06 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.06 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.05 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.04 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.04 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.00 · 93.1% (27 of 29 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Sasaya, Orochi Ascendant // Sasaya's Essence, from 29 real Commander decks.