Color Identity Spread
3.1% Sultai
-
Black 22,745 · 15.2%
-
Colorless 19,506 · 13.0%
-
Five-Color 11,641 · 7.8%
-
Simic 8,133 · 5.4%
-
White 7,245 · 4.8%
-
Naya 6,660 · 4.4%
-
Temur 6,384 · 4.3%
-
Blue 6,192 · 4.1%
-
Red 5,873 · 3.9%
-
Green 5,266 · 3.5%
-
Sultai 4,658 · 3.1%
-
Orzhov 4,379 · 2.9%
-
Dimir 3,787 · 2.5%
-
Golgari 3,699 · 2.5%
-
Grixis 3,670 · 2.4%
-
Azorius 3,339 · 2.2%
-
Rakdos 3,009 · 2.0%
- Other (15) 23,900 · 15.9%
3030+15+2+4+2+7+7+13+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 4.61 · 56.0% (1,557 of 2,779 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 2.25 · 18.5% (184 of 995 decks)
- Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 2.08 · 12.8% (273 of 2,126 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 2.07 · 30.3% (54 of 178 decks)
- Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 1.77 · 6.4% (831 of 13,086 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 1.45 · 56.3% (9 of 16 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.12 · 14.8% (16 of 108 decks)
- Jorn, God of Winter // Kaldring, the Rimestaff relevance 1.03 · 4.4% (125 of 2,858 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 1.02 · 8.1% (29 of 359 decks)
- Zimone and Dina relevance 1.02 · 4.1% (140 of 3,409 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 1.00 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.90 · 10.6% (13 of 123 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.73 · 13.3% (6 of 45 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.61 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Damia, Sage of Stone relevance 0.52 · 2.3% (38 of 1,639 decks)
- Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 0.50 · 1.4% (188 of 13,696 decks)
- Tasigur, the Golden Fang relevance 0.50 · 1.9% (57 of 2,998 decks)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 0.48 · 1.5% (108 of 7,114 decks)
- Teval, the Balanced Scale relevance 0.46 · 1.1% (304 of 27,172 decks)
- Xavier Sal, Infested Captain relevance 0.46 · 1.7% (65 of 3,931 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.46 · 16.7% (2 of 12 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Armix, Filigree Thrasher relevance 0.45 · 9.7% (3 of 31 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Keskit, the Flesh Sculptor relevance 0.44 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Homer, the Hermit relevance 0.43 · 1.5% (69 of 4,727 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.37 · 4.9% (4 of 81 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (2 of 33 decks)
- Sidisi, Brood Tyrant relevance 0.28 · 1.0% (39 of 3,754 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.27 · 5.6% (2 of 36 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.23 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
- Nashi, Moon's Legacy relevance 0.23 · 1.4% (9 of 624 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.78 · 46.0% (2,141 of 4,658 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 1.48 · 37.8% (1,762 of 4,658 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 1.47 · 33.8% (1,575 of 4,658 decks)
- Guild Summit relevance 1.44 · 32.0% (1,492 of 4,658 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 1.41 · 31.1% (1,450 of 4,658 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 1.39 · 31.0% (1,443 of 4,658 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 1.35 · 30.0% (1,397 of 4,658 decks)
- District Guide relevance 1.31 · 28.5% (1,329 of 4,658 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 1.18 · 26.2% (1,219 of 4,658 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.13 · 52.8% (2,461 of 4,658 decks)
- Gate Colossus relevance 1.07 · 21.8% (1,015 of 4,658 decks)
- Gatebreaker Ram relevance 1.06 · 21.6% (1,006 of 4,658 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.04 · 34.5% (1,609 of 4,658 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.02 · 26.1% (1,215 of 4,658 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 1.00 · 20.8% (969 of 4,658 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.92 · 20.5% (957 of 4,658 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.91 · 46.5% (2,168 of 4,658 decks)
- Glaive of the Guildpact relevance 0.90 · 17.3% (808 of 4,658 decks)
- Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 0.87 · 18.4% (859 of 4,658 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.85 · 33.9% (1,580 of 4,658 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.82 · 18.1% (844 of 4,658 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.82 · 28.2% (1,314 of 4,658 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.81 · 26.0% (1,209 of 4,658 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.80 · 32.5% (1,516 of 4,658 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.79 · 29.6% (1,378 of 4,658 decks)
- Way of the Thief relevance 0.77 · 14.2% (660 of 4,658 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.77 · 18.1% (844 of 4,658 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.76 · 31.6% (1,470 of 4,658 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.75 · 37.5% (1,748 of 4,658 decks)
- Gateway Sneak relevance 0.74 · 13.8% (641 of 4,658 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 1.39 · 31.0% (1,443 of 4,658 decks)
- District Guide relevance 1.31 · 28.5% (1,329 of 4,658 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 1.18 · 26.2% (1,219 of 4,658 decks)
- Gate Colossus relevance 1.07 · 21.8% (1,015 of 4,658 decks)
- Gatebreaker Ram relevance 1.06 · 21.6% (1,006 of 4,658 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 1.00 · 20.8% (969 of 4,658 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.91 · 46.5% (2,168 of 4,658 decks)
- Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 0.87 · 18.4% (859 of 4,658 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.85 · 33.9% (1,580 of 4,658 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.82 · 18.1% (844 of 4,658 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.81 · 26.0% (1,209 of 4,658 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.80 · 32.5% (1,516 of 4,658 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.79 · 29.6% (1,378 of 4,658 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.77 · 18.1% (844 of 4,658 decks)
- Gateway Sneak relevance 0.74 · 13.8% (641 of 4,658 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Navigation Orb relevance 1.41 · 31.1% (1,450 of 4,658 decks)
- Glaive of the Guildpact relevance 0.90 · 17.3% (808 of 4,658 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Guild Summit relevance 1.44 · 32.0% (1,492 of 4,658 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.04 · 34.5% (1,609 of 4,658 decks)
- Way of the Thief relevance 0.77 · 14.2% (660 of 4,658 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.76 · 31.6% (1,470 of 4,658 decks)
All instants (2)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.13 · 52.8% (2,461 of 4,658 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.75 · 37.5% (1,748 of 4,658 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.78 · 46.0% (2,141 of 4,658 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 1.48 · 37.8% (1,762 of 4,658 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 1.47 · 33.8% (1,575 of 4,658 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 1.35 · 30.0% (1,397 of 4,658 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 1.02 · 26.1% (1,215 of 4,658 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.92 · 20.5% (957 of 4,658 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.82 · 28.2% (1,314 of 4,658 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Maze's End relevance 1.60 · 38.7% (1,802 of 4,658 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 1.58 · 38.5% (1,794 of 4,658 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 1.57 · 38.1% (1,774 of 4,658 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.31 · 39.8% (1,852 of 4,658 decks)
- The Black Gate relevance 1.21 · 30.9% (1,440 of 4,658 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 1.17 · 36.1% (1,681 of 4,658 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 1.11 · 29.5% (1,376 of 4,658 decks)
All lands (13)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 1.61 · 39.3% (1,830 of 4,658 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 1.60 · 39.2% (1,828 of 4,658 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 1.56 · 39.4% (1,836 of 4,658 decks)
- Black Dragon Gate relevance 1.56 · 39.5% (1,838 of 4,658 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 1.55 · 39.0% (1,818 of 4,658 decks)
- Thran Portal relevance 1.49 · 35.2% (1,639 of 4,658 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 1.47 · 35.9% (1,670 of 4,658 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 1.40 · 39.7% (1,850 of 4,658 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 1.38 · 40.1% (1,870 of 4,658 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 1.36 · 40.1% (1,868 of 4,658 decks)
- Plaza of Harmony relevance 1.17 · 24.7% (1,151 of 4,658 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 1.16 · 24.8% (1,156 of 4,658 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 1.09 · 29.0% (1,351 of 4,658 decks)
EDH data for Expedition Map: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 4,658 real decks.

















































































