Color Identity Spread
7.7% Five-Color
- Black 23,519 · 15.1%
- Colorless 20,455 · 13.1%
- Five-Color 12,004 · 7.7%
- Simic 8,336 · 5.4%
- White 8,027 · 5.2%
- Naya 6,845 · 4.4%
- Temur 6,546 · 4.2%
- Blue 6,398 · 4.1%
- Red 6,111 · 3.9%
- Green 5,458 · 3.5%
- Sultai 4,776 · 3.1%
- Orzhov 4,470 · 2.9%
- Dimir 3,908 · 2.5%
- Golgari 3,799 · 2.4%
- Grixis 3,761 · 2.4%
- Azorius 3,527 · 2.3%
- Other (16) 27,872 · 17.9%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- The Wandering Minstrel relevance 3.32 · 22.0% (2,678 of 12,180 decks)
- Child of Alara relevance 2.81 · 19.3% (1,171 of 6,081 decks)
- Ulalek, Fused Atrocity relevance 2.22 · 10.2% (1,723 of 16,917 decks)
- Ramos, Dragon Engine relevance 1.40 · 6.2% (460 of 7,404 decks)
- Esika, God of the Tree // The Prismatic Bridge relevance 1.17 · 4.3% (624 of 14,421 decks)
- Tazri, Beacon of Unity relevance 1.16 · 7.3% (104 of 1,433 decks)
- Garth One-Eye relevance 1.06 · 5.3% (162 of 3,050 decks)
- Kenrith, the Returned King relevance 0.96 · 3.3% (578 of 17,664 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet Reborn relevance 0.91 · 4.6% (117 of 2,525 decks)
- Progenitus relevance 0.88 · 4.3% (125 of 2,908 decks)
- Urtet, Remnant of Memnarch relevance 0.77 · 2.8% (283 of 10,157 decks)
- Jegantha, the Wellspring relevance 0.73 · 4.7% (44 of 937 decks)
- Azlask, the Swelling Scourge relevance 0.72 · 2.8% (191 of 6,722 decks)
- Jodah, Archmage Eternal relevance 0.64 · 2.6% (134 of 5,112 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of All relevance 0.59 · 2.3% (163 of 7,195 decks)
- Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Cecily, Haunted Mage relevance 0.56 · 3.2% (41 of 1,289 decks)
- Go-Shintai of Life's Origin relevance 0.55 · 2.0% (188 of 9,454 decks)
- Rukarumel, Biologist relevance 0.53 · 2.6% (62 of 2,399 decks)
- Super-Skrull relevance 0.51 · 2.7% (48 of 1,803 decks)
- Karn, Gilded Guardian relevance 0.47 · 2.4% (46 of 1,881 decks)
- Sliver Overlord relevance 0.47 · 1.8% (113 of 6,112 decks)
- Sisay, Weatherlight Captain relevance 0.46 · 1.6% (203 of 13,023 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, Guildpact relevance 0.45 · 2.3% (45 of 1,968 decks)
- Morophon, the Boundless relevance 0.45 · 1.6% (149 of 9,301 decks)
- Jodah, the Unifier relevance 0.43 · 1.4% (259 of 19,043 decks)
- Karolina Dean, Runaway relevance 0.43 · 2.6% (27 of 1,028 decks)
- Cromat relevance 0.42 · 2.6% (25 of 949 decks)
- Atogatog relevance 0.42 · 2.4% (29 of 1,192 decks)
- Karona, False God relevance 0.41 · 1.9% (59 of 3,147 decks)
- Reaper King relevance 0.41 · 1.6% (89 of 5,399 decks)
All most relevant (23)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.53 · 42.7% (5,125 of 12,004 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.01 · 34.3% (4,116 of 12,004 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.96 · 27.4% (3,285 of 12,004 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.94 · 25.2% (3,030 of 12,004 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.91 · 28.2% (3,382 of 12,004 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 0.85 · 20.9% (2,511 of 12,004 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.80 · 22.3% (2,679 of 12,004 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 0.78 · 17.1% (2,057 of 12,004 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.77 · 28.1% (3,375 of 12,004 decks)
- Guild Summit relevance 0.75 · 16.2% (1,949 of 12,004 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.74 · 16.1% (1,931 of 12,004 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.73 · 17.3% (2,081 of 12,004 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 0.73 · 15.5% (1,858 of 12,004 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.71 · 23.0% (2,764 of 12,004 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.69 · 19.1% (2,294 of 12,004 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.66 · 19.3% (2,312 of 12,004 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.66 · 15.1% (1,814 of 12,004 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.66 · 14.2% (1,705 of 12,004 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.65 · 14.6% (1,757 of 12,004 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.65 · 17.7% (2,127 of 12,004 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.65 · 15.4% (1,845 of 12,004 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.64 · 27.3% (3,272 of 12,004 decks)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 0.63 · 13.4% (1,610 of 12,004 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.94 · 25.2% (3,030 of 12,004 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.80 · 22.3% (2,679 of 12,004 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.73 · 17.3% (2,081 of 12,004 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 0.73 · 15.5% (1,858 of 12,004 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.65 · 17.7% (2,127 of 12,004 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.65 · 15.4% (1,845 of 12,004 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.64 · 27.3% (3,272 of 12,004 decks)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 0.63 · 13.4% (1,610 of 12,004 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Navigation Orb relevance 0.78 · 17.1% (2,057 of 12,004 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.74 · 16.1% (1,931 of 12,004 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Guild Summit relevance 0.75 · 16.2% (1,949 of 12,004 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.69 · 19.1% (2,294 of 12,004 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.66 · 19.3% (2,312 of 12,004 decks)
All instants (2)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.01 · 34.3% (4,116 of 12,004 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.77 · 28.1% (3,375 of 12,004 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.53 · 42.7% (5,125 of 12,004 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.96 · 27.4% (3,285 of 12,004 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.91 · 28.2% (3,382 of 12,004 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 0.85 · 20.9% (2,511 of 12,004 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.71 · 23.0% (2,764 of 12,004 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.66 · 15.1% (1,814 of 12,004 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.66 · 14.2% (1,705 of 12,004 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.65 · 14.6% (1,757 of 12,004 decks)
All utility lands (6)
- Maze's End relevance 1.03 · 29.2% (3,502 of 12,004 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.94 · 25.8% (3,097 of 12,004 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.87 · 22.8% (2,733 of 12,004 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 0.81 · 21.6% (2,590 of 12,004 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.75 · 19.5% (2,339 of 12,004 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.64 · 16.7% (2,000 of 12,004 decks)
All lands (21)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 1.00 · 30.0% (3,605 of 12,004 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.98 · 29.2% (3,507 of 12,004 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.97 · 28.9% (3,465 of 12,004 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.97 · 28.8% (3,456 of 12,004 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.96 · 28.1% (3,370 of 12,004 decks)
- Azorius Guildgate relevance 0.95 · 28.3% (3,396 of 12,004 decks)
- Izzet Guildgate relevance 0.94 · 27.8% (3,335 of 12,004 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 0.93 · 26.3% (3,162 of 12,004 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 0.93 · 26.6% (3,188 of 12,004 decks)
- Orzhov Guildgate relevance 0.92 · 26.8% (3,220 of 12,004 decks)
- Boros Guildgate relevance 0.92 · 27.0% (3,240 of 12,004 decks)
- Rakdos Guildgate relevance 0.91 · 26.4% (3,165 of 12,004 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.86 · 24.5% (2,941 of 12,004 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 0.85 · 23.8% (2,851 of 12,004 decks)
- Citadel Gate relevance 0.83 · 23.2% (2,783 of 12,004 decks)
- Black Dragon Gate relevance 0.83 · 23.4% (2,808 of 12,004 decks)
- Cliffgate relevance 0.82 · 22.9% (2,746 of 12,004 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.74 · 21.1% (2,533 of 12,004 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.72 · 17.6% (2,110 of 12,004 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.66 · 15.2% (1,824 of 12,004 decks)
- Thran Portal relevance 0.63 · 14.7% (1,761 of 12,004 decks)
EDH data for Expedition Map: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 12,004 real decks.