Petrified Field
Played in 556 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (13)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 3.04 · 9.4% (82 of 875 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 1.49 · 1.2% (86 of 6,991 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 1.31 · 1.3% (43 of 3,241 decks)
- Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 1.30 · 1.0% (71 of 7,046 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 1.08 · 1.5% (18 of 1,183 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 0.98 · 1.1% (21 of 1,916 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.91 · 4.8% (4 of 84 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.78 · 1.9% (6 of 321 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.52 · 2.9% (2 of 69 decks)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 0.50 · 1.1% (4 of 376 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.42 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 0.35 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
All most relevant (26)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.03 · 46.4% (258 of 556 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.03 · 25.4% (141 of 556 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 1.02 · 18.7% (104 of 556 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.97 · 31.1% (173 of 556 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.95 · 25.4% (141 of 556 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.95 · 30.4% (169 of 556 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.94 · 41.4% (230 of 556 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.93 · 21.4% (119 of 556 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.87 · 25.0% (139 of 556 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.86 · 37.6% (209 of 556 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.85 · 20.7% (115 of 556 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.85 · 19.2% (107 of 556 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.83 · 31.5% (175 of 556 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.82 · 24.8% (138 of 556 decks)
- Trade Routes relevance 0.77 · 17.6% (98 of 556 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.75 · 29.3% (163 of 556 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.74 · 19.2% (107 of 556 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.74 · 23.6% (131 of 556 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.73 · 32.6% (181 of 556 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.71 · 18.7% (104 of 556 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.71 · 37.4% (208 of 556 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.70 · 21.4% (119 of 556 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.69 · 24.6% (137 of 556 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.68 · 25.5% (142 of 556 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.68 · 35.4% (197 of 556 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.66 · 48.2% (268 of 556 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.97 · 31.1% (173 of 556 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.95 · 25.4% (141 of 556 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.94 · 41.4% (230 of 556 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.93 · 21.4% (119 of 556 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.86 · 37.6% (209 of 556 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.85 · 20.7% (115 of 556 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.83 · 31.5% (175 of 556 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.75 · 29.3% (163 of 556 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.71 · 37.4% (208 of 556 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.69 · 24.6% (137 of 556 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.68 · 25.5% (142 of 556 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.68 · 35.4% (197 of 556 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.66 · 48.2% (268 of 556 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.87 · 25.0% (139 of 556 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.85 · 19.2% (107 of 556 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.82 · 24.8% (138 of 556 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.70 · 21.4% (119 of 556 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Trade Routes relevance 0.77 · 17.6% (98 of 556 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.74 · 23.6% (131 of 556 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.73 · 32.6% (181 of 556 decks)
All instants (2)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.03 · 46.4% (258 of 556 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 1.02 · 18.7% (104 of 556 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.03 · 25.4% (141 of 556 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.95 · 30.4% (169 of 556 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.74 · 19.2% (107 of 556 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.71 · 18.7% (104 of 556 decks)
All utility lands (16)
- Urza's Cave relevance 1.49 · 45.0% (250 of 556 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.48 · 50.5% (281 of 556 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 1.31 · 30.9% (172 of 556 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.19 · 36.2% (201 of 556 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 1.15 · 28.2% (157 of 556 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 1.09 · 38.3% (213 of 556 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 1.03 · 26.8% (149 of 556 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 1.02 · 27.0% (150 of 556 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.93 · 27.2% (151 of 556 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.87 · 29.7% (165 of 556 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.83 · 18.3% (102 of 556 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.81 · 20.3% (113 of 556 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 0.75 · 19.2% (107 of 556 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.69 · 19.2% (107 of 556 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.69 · 39.6% (220 of 556 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.67 · 43.0% (239 of 556 decks)
All lands (8)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 1.77 · 39.6% (220 of 556 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 1.33 · 44.6% (248 of 556 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 1.29 · 41.5% (231 of 556 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 1.08 · 26.1% (145 of 556 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.73 · 20.5% (114 of 556 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 0.71 · 18.5% (103 of 556 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.68 · 22.3% (124 of 556 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.66 · 21.6% (120 of 556 decks)
EDH data for Petrified Field: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 556 real decks.