Cards like Harrow
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
93% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Selesnya decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Harrow 67%
- Roiling Regrowth 33%
- Cycle of Renewal 20%
- Scapeshift 20%
- Entish Restoration 13%
Other options: Planar Engineering
Cards like Cultivate
2.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
100% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other Selesnya decks
73% of decks run two or more
vs. 29% of other Selesnya decks
2.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.95 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Cultivate 73%
- Kodama's Reach 60%
- Rampant Growth 60%
- Beneath the Sands 13%
- Explosive Vegetation 13%
- Roamer's Routine 13%
- Map the Frontier 7%
- Primal Growth 7%
- They Went This Way 7%
- Search for Tomorrow 7%
- Shared Roots 7%
- Migration Path 7%
Other options: Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Grow from the Ashes, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Ancient Greenwarden
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Three Visits
2.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Selesnya decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Selesnya decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Ranger's Path, Field Trip, Hunting Wilds
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Mossborn Hydra
9.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Mossborn Hydra 27%
- Territorial Scythecat 13%
- Sazh's Chocobo 13%
- Vinelasher Kudzu 7%
- Undergrowth Champion 7%
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 7%
- Prowling Felidar 7%
Other options: Seedship Agrarian, Foe-liage, Oran-Rief Hydra, Floral Evoker, Murasa Ranger, Scythecat Cub
Cards like Anointed Procession
2.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other Selesnya decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Selesnya decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.38 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Fog
8.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Fog 27%
- Druid's Deliverance 13%
Other options: Ethereal Haze, Defend the Hearth, Eerie Interference, Commencement of Festivities, Thwart the Enemy, Forfend, Chameleon Blur, Divine Light, Holy Day, Tanglesap, Pause for Reflection, Moment's Peace, Harmless Assault, Terrifying Presence, Root Snare, Lull, Safe Passage, Serene Sunset, Winds of Qal Sisma, Haze of Pollen, Vine Snare, Angelsong
Cards like Elspeth, Storm Slayer
7.0× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Selesnya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Path to Exile
5.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 54% of other Selesnya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.57 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Mentor of the Meek
4.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Selesnya decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Garruk's Packleader, Soul of the Harvest
Cards like Crucible of Worlds
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Wood Elves
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Elder
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Krosan Wayfarer, Dawntreader Elk
Cards like Flawless Maneuver
9.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Shamanic Revelation
9.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Scute Swarm
5.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Harrow relevance 0.22 · 66.7% (10 of 15 decks)
- Murasa Rootgrazer relevance 0.22 · 53.3% (8 of 15 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.21 · 60.0% (9 of 15 decks)
- Mentor of the Meek relevance 0.21 · 53.3% (8 of 15 decks)
- Queen Allenal of Ruadach relevance 0.22 · 46.7% (7 of 15 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.22 · 40.0% (6 of 15 decks)
- King Darien XLVIII relevance 0.23 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.21 · 40.0% (6 of 15 decks)
- Retreat to Emeria relevance 0.17 · 66.7% (10 of 15 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.22 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.23 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Camaraderie relevance 0.21 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Caretaker's Talent relevance 0.19 · 40.0% (6 of 15 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.20 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Kinbinding relevance 0.21 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Intangible Virtue relevance 0.20 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.15 · 60.0% (9 of 15 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.15 · 60.0% (9 of 15 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.13 · 73.3% (11 of 15 decks)
- Mondrak, Glory Dominus relevance 0.20 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.15 · 53.3% (8 of 15 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.16 · 46.7% (7 of 15 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.16 · 40.0% (6 of 15 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.15 · 46.7% (7 of 15 decks)
- Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.17 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Tome of Legends relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Beneath the Sands relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Full Steam Ahead relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Symmetry Matrix relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Kyler, Sigardian Emissary relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.15 · 46.7% (7 of 15 decks)
- Anointed Procession relevance 0.17 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.19 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Railway Brawler relevance 0.19 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Make a Stand relevance 0.19 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Cosmic Rebirth relevance 0.19 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Overlord of the Hauntwoods relevance 0.18 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.14 · 40.0% (6 of 15 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.16 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Knight of the Reliquary relevance 0.16 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Secret Rendezvous relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Ruin Ghost relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Burnished Hart relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.17 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.17 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Murasa Rootgrazer relevance 0.22 · 53.3% (8 of 15 decks)
- Mentor of the Meek relevance 0.21 · 53.3% (8 of 15 decks)
- Queen Allenal of Ruadach relevance 0.22 · 46.7% (7 of 15 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.22 · 40.0% (6 of 15 decks)
- King Darien XLVIII relevance 0.23 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Mondrak, Glory Dominus relevance 0.20 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.15 · 53.3% (8 of 15 decks)
- Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.17 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Kyler, Sigardian Emissary relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.15 · 46.7% (7 of 15 decks)
- Railway Brawler relevance 0.19 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Overlord of the Hauntwoods relevance 0.18 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Knight of the Reliquary relevance 0.16 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Burnished Hart relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Ruin Ghost relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.17 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.11 · 66.7% (10 of 15 decks)
- Katilda, Dawnhart Prime relevance 0.17 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.16 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Rumor Gatherer relevance 0.15 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.14 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.14 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Ojer Taq, Deepest Foundation // Temple of Civilization relevance 0.16 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.16 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Exalted Sunborn relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.14 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Sporemound relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Trostani Discordant relevance 0.15 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Cadira, Caller of the Small relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Canyon Jerboa relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Territorial Scythecat relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.10 · 46.7% (7 of 15 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 0.08 · 66.7% (10 of 15 decks)
- Brigid, Clachan's Heart // Brigid, Doun's Mind relevance 0.13 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Dúnedain Rangers relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Cavalry Pegasus relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Dawnhart Wardens relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Steward of the Harvest relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Starry-Eyed Skyrider relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Conclave Cavalier relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Crowd-Control Warden relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Usher of the Fallen relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Anafenza, Unyielding Lineage relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Tah-Crop Elite relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Benevolent Bodyguard relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
All artifacts (37)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.22 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Tome of Legends relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Symmetry Matrix relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.15 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.15 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.13 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Dolmen Gate relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Wildfield Borderpost relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Heraldic Banner relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- The Regalia relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Stone of Erech relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Hourglass of the Lost relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.12 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.12 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.12 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Dragon Throne of Tarkir relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Thunderous Velocipede relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Collector's Vault relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Explorer's Scope relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.11 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.06 · 60.0% (9 of 15 decks)
- Halo Fountain relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.09 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.09 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.07 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.08 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.08 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.07 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Retreat to Emeria relevance 0.17 · 66.7% (10 of 15 decks)
- Caretaker's Talent relevance 0.19 · 40.0% (6 of 15 decks)
- Kinbinding relevance 0.21 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Intangible Virtue relevance 0.20 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Anointed Procession relevance 0.17 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.19 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.16 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.17 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Flowering of the White Tree relevance 0.17 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.16 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Divine Visitation relevance 0.15 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.13 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.13 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- In the Trenches relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Aegis of Honor relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Prison Term relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Grafted Growth relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Court of Ardenvale relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Charitable Levy relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Promise of Tomorrow relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Legion Loyalty relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.13 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.11 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Together Forever relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Seal of Cleansing relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Court of Grace relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Perilous Forays relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.11 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Swift Reconfiguration relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Marshal's Anthem relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Beorn's Hospitality relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Inspiring Leader relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Bonds of Mortality relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.10 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Omenpath Journey relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Pacifism relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Grasp of Fate relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.05 · 80.0% (12 of 15 decks)
- Tocasia's Welcome relevance 0.09 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Anthem of Champions relevance 0.09 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
All instants (50)
- Harrow relevance 0.22 · 66.7% (10 of 15 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.23 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.20 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.16 · 40.0% (6 of 15 decks)
- Cosmic Rebirth relevance 0.19 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Make a Stand relevance 0.19 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.15 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.17 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Druid's Deliverance relevance 0.17 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.15 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Sundering Growth relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Rite of Harmony relevance 0.14 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Rootborn Defenses relevance 0.15 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.15 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Second Harvest relevance 0.13 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Impeccable Timing relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Warhorn Blast relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Gods Willing relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Charge relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- March of Otherworldly Light relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Oblation relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Assure // Assemble relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Borrowed Grace relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Debt of Loyalty relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Forsake the Worldly relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Emerge Unscathed relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Family Reunion relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Inspired Charge relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- In the Presence of Ages relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Divine Arrow relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Raise the Alarm relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Fertilid's Favor relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Fortify relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Orim's Chant relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Band Together relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Wilt relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Might of the Masses relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.13 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.11 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Secure the Wastes relevance 0.12 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.10 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Shelter relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Feat of Resistance relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Luminous Rebuke relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Galadriel's Dismissal relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Explore relevance 0.21 · 60.0% (9 of 15 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.21 · 40.0% (6 of 15 decks)
- Camaraderie relevance 0.21 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.15 · 60.0% (9 of 15 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.15 · 60.0% (9 of 15 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.13 · 73.3% (11 of 15 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.16 · 46.7% (7 of 15 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.15 · 46.7% (7 of 15 decks)
- Beneath the Sands relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Full Steam Ahead relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.14 · 40.0% (6 of 15 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Secret Rendezvous relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.17 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.12 · 46.7% (7 of 15 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.16 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.13 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.16 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Martial Coup relevance 0.15 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Hour of Reckoning relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Felling Blow relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Cathartic Parting relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Scale Up relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Ethereal Guidance relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Fell the Mighty relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Travel Preparations relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Glimpse the Core relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Commune with Beavers relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Gaea's Blessing relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Kytheon's Tactics relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- They Went This Way relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- By Invitation Only relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Collective Effort relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Calming Verse relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Reap and Sow relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Revoke Existence relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Will of the Sultai relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Cut a Deal relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Overwhelming Encounter relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Winds of Rath relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Morningtide's Light relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Eriette's Lullaby relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Crisis of Conscience relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Into the North relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (8)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.16 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Elspeth, Storm Slayer relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Elspeth, Sun's Champion relevance 0.15 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Ajani, Caller of the Pride relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Moag // Bloomwielder Dryads relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.19 · 40.0% (6 of 15 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.15 · 46.7% (7 of 15 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.18 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Hidden Courtyard relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.18 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.17 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Emeria's Call // Emeria, Shattered Skyclave relevance 0.17 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.16 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.12 · 40.0% (6 of 15 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.16 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.14 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.12 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.12 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Night Market relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Throne of the High City relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Ondu Inversion // Ondu Skyruins relevance 0.12 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Cryptic Caves relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Ice Floe relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Vastwood Fortification // Vastwood Thicket relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Kjeldoran Outpost relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.12 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Restless Prairie relevance 0.12 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Makindi Stampede // Makindi Mesas relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Secluded Steppe relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Fertile Thicket relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Windbrisk Heights relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Kyoshi Village relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Kabira Takedown // Kabira Plateau relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Kazandu Mammoth // Kazandu Valley relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.08 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.08 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.09 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.09 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.08 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.08 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.08 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
All lands (50)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.11 · 86.7% (13 of 15 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.20 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Ruins of Trokair relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Havenwood Battleground relevance 0.20 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.12 · 66.7% (10 of 15 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.18 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.17 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.16 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.15 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.17 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.15 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.16 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.13 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.11 · 40.0% (6 of 15 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.13 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Karoo relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Uncharted Haven relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Thawing Glaciers relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.12 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Terminal Moraine relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Etched Cornfield relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.10 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.08 · 53.3% (8 of 15 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.11 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.12 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.08 · 46.7% (7 of 15 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.09 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.06 · 60.0% (9 of 15 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Naya Panorama relevance 0.11 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.09 · 20.0% (3 of 15 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.09 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.09 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.10 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.09 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.08 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Maja, Bretagard Protector, from 15 real Commander decks.