Change per day
Archetypes
61% of decks lean toward it
50% of decks lean toward it
42% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
With signature card Avenger of Zendikar
61% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Avacyn, Angel of Hope
50% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Karametra, God of Harvests
42% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 66 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
Cards like Cultivate
2.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
85% of decks run one or more
vs. 54% of other Selesnya decks
78% of decks run two or more
vs. 32% of other Selesnya decks
3.2 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Cultivate 70%
- Kodama's Reach 65%
- Rampant Growth 54%
- Migration Path 30%
- Explosive Vegetation 21%
- Boundless Realms 11%
- Traverse the Outlands 11%
- Shared Roots 10%
- Reshape the Earth 10%
- Search for Tomorrow 7%
- Map the Frontier 4%
- Far Wanderings 4%
- Harvest Season 4%
- Grow from the Ashes 3%
- Roamer's Routine 3%
- Reach the Horizon 2%
- Terramorph 2%
- Primal Growth 2%
- Deep Reconnaissance 2%
- Untamed Wilds 2%
- They Went This Way 1%
- Nissa's Expedition 1%
Other options: Celebrate the Harvest, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Slimefoot's Survey, Verdant Mastery, Map the Wastes
Cards like Nature's Lore
3.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Selesnya decks
61% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Selesnya decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 57%
- Skyshroud Claim 56%
- Three Visits 48%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 8%
- Hunting Wilds 5%
- Ranger's Path 3%
- Glimpse the Core 1%
Other options: Field Trip
Cards like Ohran Frostfang
9.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Selesnya decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Selesnya decks
0.92 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Oakhame Adversary, Ohran Viper
Cards like Mirari's Wake
18× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Selesnya decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Mirari's Wake 63%
- Zendikar Resurgent 27%
Other options: Dictate of Karametra, Heartbeat of Spring
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 48% of other Selesnya decks
45% of decks run two or more
vs. 31% of other Selesnya decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 1.1 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 45%
- Avacyn's Pilgrim 44%
- Elvish Mystic 38%
- Fyndhorn Elves 27%
- Nantuko Elder 1%
- Boreal Druid 1%
- Steward of Valeron 1%
Other options: Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Llanowar Tribe, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Beast Within
1.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 39% of other Selesnya decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 19% of other Selesnya decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Beast Within 47%
- Generous Gift 36%
Cards like Harrow
14× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Selesnya decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Scapeshift
Cards like Austere Command
9.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Selesnya decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
2.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Selesnya decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 30%
- Lightning Greaves 25%
Cards like Aerial Responder
17× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Healer's Flock, Seraph of Dawn, Sungrace Pegasus
Cards like Nissa, Who Shakes the World
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Exploration
9.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
2.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Eladamri's Call
1.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Eladamri's Call 20%
- Worldly Tutor 11%
- Sylvan Tutor 2%
Cards like Path to Exile
1.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 54% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.57 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Angelic Skirmisher
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Wood Elves
8.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Elder
6.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Krosan Wayfarer, Oashra Cultivator
Cards like Sol Ring
1.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 73% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.75 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Majestic Myriarch
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.71 · 60.8% (96 of 158 decks)
- Odric, Lunarch Marshal relevance 0.46 · 77.2% (122 of 158 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.60 · 46.2% (73 of 158 decks)
- Zetalpa, Primal Dawn relevance 0.54 · 45.6% (72 of 158 decks)
- Concerted Effort relevance 0.62 · 32.3% (51 of 158 decks)
- Akroma, Angel of Wrath relevance 0.57 · 38.6% (61 of 158 decks)
- Crystalline Giant relevance 0.65 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Majestic Myriarch relevance 0.61 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.45 · 52.5% (83 of 158 decks)
- Angelic Skirmisher relevance 0.52 · 39.2% (62 of 158 decks)
- Baneslayer Angel relevance 0.53 · 35.4% (56 of 158 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.52 · 34.2% (54 of 158 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.46 · 37.3% (59 of 158 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.38 · 55.7% (88 of 158 decks)
- Sire of Seven Deaths relevance 0.54 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
- True Conviction relevance 0.41 · 44.9% (71 of 158 decks)
- Majestic Genesis relevance 0.58 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.48 · 27.8% (44 of 158 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.46 · 30.4% (48 of 158 decks)
- Archetype of Courage relevance 0.47 · 28.5% (45 of 158 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.56 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.44 · 31.0% (49 of 158 decks)
- Aerial Responder relevance 0.49 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.42 · 26.6% (42 of 158 decks)
- Shrike Force relevance 0.48 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.33 · 45.6% (72 of 158 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.48 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.46 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
- Angel of Invention relevance 0.43 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.41 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.40 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 0.33 · 41.1% (65 of 158 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.47 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Sigarda, Font of Blessings relevance 0.34 · 36.7% (58 of 158 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 0.34 · 36.7% (58 of 158 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.24 · 63.3% (100 of 158 decks)
- Vexilus Praetor relevance 0.44 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.41 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.44 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.37 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Akroma's Vengeance relevance 0.43 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.35 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.35 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.42 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Yasharn, Implacable Earth relevance 0.32 · 25.9% (41 of 158 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.37 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
- Selective Adaptation relevance 0.45 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Dragon Sniper relevance 0.35 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.37 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.26 · 44.3% (70 of 158 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Odric, Lunarch Marshal relevance 0.46 · 77.2% (122 of 158 decks)
- Zetalpa, Primal Dawn relevance 0.54 · 45.6% (72 of 158 decks)
- Akroma, Angel of Wrath relevance 0.57 · 38.6% (61 of 158 decks)
- Crystalline Giant relevance 0.65 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Majestic Myriarch relevance 0.61 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Angelic Skirmisher relevance 0.52 · 39.2% (62 of 158 decks)
- Baneslayer Angel relevance 0.53 · 35.4% (56 of 158 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.52 · 34.2% (54 of 158 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.46 · 37.3% (59 of 158 decks)
- Sire of Seven Deaths relevance 0.54 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
- Archetype of Courage relevance 0.47 · 28.5% (45 of 158 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.44 · 31.0% (49 of 158 decks)
- Aerial Responder relevance 0.49 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Shrike Force relevance 0.48 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.33 · 45.6% (72 of 158 decks)
- Angel of Invention relevance 0.43 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.41 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 0.33 · 41.1% (65 of 158 decks)
- Sigarda, Font of Blessings relevance 0.34 · 36.7% (58 of 158 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 0.34 · 36.7% (58 of 158 decks)
- Vexilus Praetor relevance 0.44 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.37 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Yasharn, Implacable Earth relevance 0.32 · 25.9% (41 of 158 decks)
- Dragon Sniper relevance 0.35 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.37 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.26 · 44.3% (70 of 158 decks)
- Archon of Valor's Reach relevance 0.36 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
- Oketra the True relevance 0.42 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.43 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.31 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.27 · 36.1% (57 of 158 decks)
- Thraben Watcher relevance 0.36 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.37 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Shalai, Voice of Plenty relevance 0.21 · 57.0% (90 of 158 decks)
- Lyra Dawnbringer relevance 0.31 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.39 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- The Legend of Kyoshi // Avatar Kyoshi relevance 0.34 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.29 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Tower Winder relevance 0.34 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.26 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Boon-Bringer Valkyrie relevance 0.35 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.29 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
- Sigarda, Host of Herons relevance 0.28 · 13.9% (22 of 158 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.33 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.29 · 10.8% (17 of 158 decks)
- Avatar Kyoshi, Earthbender relevance 0.33 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Dragonlord Dromoka relevance 0.29 · 10.8% (17 of 158 decks)
- Groundchuck & Dirtbag relevance 0.33 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Segovian Angel relevance 0.32 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite relevance 0.25 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
All artifacts (36)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.45 · 52.5% (83 of 158 decks)
- Eater of Virtue relevance 0.43 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.29 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Oketra's Monument relevance 0.26 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Sword of Vengeance relevance 0.28 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.19 · 25.3% (40 of 158 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.20 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Heartstone relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.25 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.16 · 30.4% (48 of 158 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.18 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.16 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.19 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.17 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- The Immortal Sun relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.15 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.07 · 54.4% (86 of 158 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Pearl Medallion relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 70.9% (112 of 158 decks)
- Halo Fountain relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Concerted Effort relevance 0.62 · 32.3% (51 of 158 decks)
- True Conviction relevance 0.41 · 44.9% (71 of 158 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.42 · 26.6% (42 of 158 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.37 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
- Terra Eternal relevance 0.41 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Brave the Sands relevance 0.35 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.20 · 63.3% (100 of 158 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.36 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.24 · 38.0% (60 of 158 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.33 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Court of Bounty relevance 0.35 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Earth Surge relevance 0.42 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.32 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.26 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.32 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.31 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.26 · 15.8% (25 of 158 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.29 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Always Watching relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.27 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.21 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.24 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.19 · 19.0% (30 of 158 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.25 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.17 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.18 · 14.6% (23 of 158 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.22 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Land Tax relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Privileged Position relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.19 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.16 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.22 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.17 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.15 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.14 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.13 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Luminarch Ascension relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.16 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Trouble in Pairs relevance 0.15 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.15 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Virtue of Loyalty // Ardenvale Fealty relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Angelic Destiny relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Flowering of the White Tree relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Darksteel Mutation relevance 0.12 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.12 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
All instants (50)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.71 · 60.8% (96 of 158 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.24 · 63.3% (100 of 158 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.41 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.44 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.35 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.35 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.26 · 41.8% (66 of 158 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.37 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.27 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.22 · 22.2% (35 of 158 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.23 · 13.9% (22 of 158 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.27 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.20 · 26.6% (42 of 158 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.23 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Final Showdown relevance 0.24 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.19 · 14.6% (23 of 158 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.18 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.15 · 36.1% (57 of 158 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.13 · 46.8% (74 of 158 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.17 · 17.7% (28 of 158 decks)
- Earthshape relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Return to Dust relevance 0.22 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.12 · 48.7% (77 of 158 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.22 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.18 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Akroma's Blessing relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.19 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.18 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Eerie Interlude relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.18 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.16 · 10.8% (17 of 158 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.22 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Secure the Wastes relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.16 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.08 · 60.1% (95 of 158 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.14 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.06 · 68.4% (108 of 158 decks)
- Make a Stand relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Get Lost relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.15 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Rebuff the Wicked relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.14 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.60 · 46.2% (73 of 158 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.38 · 55.7% (88 of 158 decks)
- Majestic Genesis relevance 0.58 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.46 · 30.4% (48 of 158 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.56 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.48 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.40 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.47 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Akroma's Vengeance relevance 0.43 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Selective Adaptation relevance 0.45 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.20 · 65.2% (103 of 158 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.26 · 34.2% (54 of 158 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.36 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.39 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.34 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.32 · 10.8% (17 of 158 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.33 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Slash the Ranks relevance 0.33 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.29 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.32 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.19 · 48.1% (76 of 158 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.21 · 38.6% (61 of 158 decks)
- Cleansing Nova relevance 0.27 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Kamahl's Druidic Vow relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.17 · 51.9% (82 of 158 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.27 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.29 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.23 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.15 · 53.8% (85 of 158 decks)
- Hour of Revelation relevance 0.29 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.25 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.32 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.20 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.12 · 69.6% (110 of 158 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.14 · 57.0% (90 of 158 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.29 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.23 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.29 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.19 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.21 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.17 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.21 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- The Great Aurora relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.21 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Planar Outburst relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (9)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.48 · 27.8% (44 of 158 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.42 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.39 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.31 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.17 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.46 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.34 · 25.9% (41 of 158 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 0.42 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.25 · 34.2% (54 of 158 decks)
- Ondu Inversion // Ondu Skyruins relevance 0.32 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.30 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.30 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.23 · 27.8% (44 of 158 decks)
- Emeria's Call // Emeria, Shattered Skyclave relevance 0.28 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.26 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.19 · 31.0% (49 of 158 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.22 · 15.8% (25 of 158 decks)
- Stirring Wildwood relevance 0.26 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.26 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.18 · 32.9% (52 of 158 decks)
- Restless Prairie relevance 0.22 · 13.9% (22 of 158 decks)
- Emeria, the Sky Ruin relevance 0.25 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.22 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.18 · 28.5% (45 of 158 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.26 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.22 · 10.8% (17 of 158 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.21 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.17 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.23 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.17 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.21 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.20 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Cave of the Frost Dragon relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.18 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Blinkmoth Nexus relevance 0.24 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.17 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Windbrisk Heights relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Nantuko Monastery relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.22 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.17 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.12 · 22.2% (35 of 158 decks)
- Treetop Village relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.13 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.14 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 13.9% (22 of 158 decks)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.14 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.16 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.13 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
All lands (43)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.29 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.25 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.23 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.19 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.18 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.15 · 39.2% (62 of 158 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.19 · 13.9% (22 of 158 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.21 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.17 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.18 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.20 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.16 · 24.7% (39 of 158 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.19 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.18 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.13 · 32.3% (51 of 158 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.10 · 48.1% (76 of 158 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.18 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.11 · 43.7% (69 of 158 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.17 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.09 · 56.3% (89 of 158 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.13 · 22.8% (36 of 158 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.11 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.11 · 33.5% (53 of 158 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.10 · 39.9% (63 of 158 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.13 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.13 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.07 · 59.5% (94 of 158 decks)
- Thornglint Bridge relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.06 · 64.6% (102 of 158 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.10 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 77.8% (123 of 158 decks)
- Plains relevance 0.01 · 93.7% (148 of 158 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 94.3% (149 of 158 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor, from 158 real Commander partner decks.