Cards like Cultivate
2.6× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 46% of other Bant decks
57% of decks run two or more
vs. 22% of other Bant decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.77 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Cultivate 71%
- Kodama's Reach 57%
- Rampant Growth 43%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Grow from the Ashes, Search for Tomorrow, Shared Roots, Explosive Vegetation, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Migration Path, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Sporemound
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Sporemound 71%
- Elfsworn Giant 29%
Cards like Ponder
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Cards like Archaeomancer
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Archaeomancer 43%
- Mnemonic Wall 29%
- Shipwreck Dowser 14%
Other options: Scholar of the Ages, Scrivener, Salvager of Secrets
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Bant decks
Cards like Tatyova, Benthic Druid
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Prowling Felidar
17× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Bant decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Seedship Agrarian, Foe-liage, Oran-Rief Hydra, Floral Evoker, Vinelasher Kudzu, Mossborn Hydra, Murasa Ranger, Sazh's Chocobo, Undergrowth Champion, Bristly Bill, Spine Sower
Cards like Three Visits
2.6× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Bant decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other Bant decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Three Visits 57%
- Nature's Lore 43%
- Skyshroud Claim 14%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Field Trip, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Hunting Wilds, Glimpse the Core
Cards like Ephemerate
8.0× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Bant decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Ephemerate 29%
- Momentary Blink 29%
- Cloudshift 14%
Other options: Blur, Justiciar's Portal, Acrobatic Maneuver, Turn to Mist, Scrollshift, Flicker of Fate, Liberate
Cards like Refocus
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Refocus 29%
- Cerulean Wisps 14%
Cards like Seeker of Skybreak
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Niblis of the Breath, Fyndhorn Brownie, Captain of the Mists, Puppeteer
Cards like Clever Conjurer
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Clever Conjurer 29%
- Nimbleclaw Adept 14%
Cards like Goliath Paladin
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Goliath Paladin 29%
- Aarakocra Sneak 14%
- Avenging Hunter 14%
Cards like Mobilize
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Cards like Heliod's Pilgrim
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Light-Paws, Emperor's Voice, Auratouched Mage, Boonweaver Giant
Cards like Journey to Nowhere
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards like Annoyed Altisaur
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Bant decks
Cards like Shore Up
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Shore Up 43%
- Octopus Form 14%
- Magic Damper 14%
Other options: Mizzium Skin, Dive Down, Glint, You See a Guard Approach, Shell Shield, Chase Inspiration
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Wayward Swordtooth, Loot, Exuberant Explorer
Cards like Moment's Peace
14× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Moment's Peace 43%
- Fog 14%
- Angelsong 14%
Other options: Ethereal Haze, Defend the Hearth, Eerie Interference, Commencement of Festivities, Thwart the Enemy, Forfend, Chameleon Blur, Divine Light, Holy Day, Tanglesap, Pause for Reflection, Harmless Assault, Terrifying Presence, Root Snare, Lull, Safe Passage, Serene Sunset, Winds of Qal Sisma, Haze of Pollen, Vine Snare, Druid's Deliverance
Cards like Vizier of Tumbling Sands
10× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands 71%
- Fatestitcher 14%
- Forensic Researcher 14%
- Kelpie Guide 14%
- North Pole Patrol 14%
- Ioreth of the Healing House 14%
Other options: Kiora's Follower
Cards like Wild Growth
3.6× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Wild Growth 29%
- Market Festival 14%
- Dawn's Reflection 14%
- Overgrowth 14%
Other options: Verdant Haven, Glittering Frost, Blighted Burgeoning, Wolfwillow Haven, Shimmerwilds Growth, Fertile Ground, Buried in the Garden
Cards like Generous Gift
1.4× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Bant decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.42 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Generous Gift 29%
- Beast Within 14%
Cards like Avacyn's Pilgrim
1.1× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 24% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other Bant decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.49 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Avacyn's Pilgrim 43%
- Elvish Mystic 14%
- Llanowar Elves 14%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Gyre Engineer, Boreal Druid, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Steward of Valeron, Orochi Sustainer, Fyndhorn Elves
All top picks (50)
- Sporemound relevance 0.33 · 71.4% (5 of 7 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.27 · 71.4% (5 of 7 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.26 · 57.1% (4 of 7 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.22 · 71.4% (5 of 7 decks)
- Journey to Nowhere relevance 0.23 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Azure Fleet Admiral relevance 0.23 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Crypsis relevance 0.23 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Heliod's Pilgrim relevance 0.20 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Goliath Paladin relevance 0.22 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.19 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Prowling Felidar relevance 0.21 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Sprout Swarm relevance 0.21 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Mobilize relevance 0.21 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.21 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.20 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.18 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Midnight Guard relevance 0.20 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.15 · 57.1% (4 of 7 decks)
- Krosan Restorer relevance 0.19 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Stone-Seeder Hierophant relevance 0.19 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.19 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Prismatic Strands relevance 0.18 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.18 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Clever Conjurer relevance 0.18 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.16 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.17 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Presence of Gond relevance 0.17 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.15 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Reaping the Rewards relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Pegasus Stampede relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.13 · 57.1% (4 of 7 decks)
- Sunspire Gatekeepers relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.16 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.16 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.13 · 57.1% (4 of 7 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.14 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Simic Ragworm relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Guardian of the Guildpact relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Opal Lake Gatekeepers relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Wave-Wing Elemental relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.15 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.15 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Information Dealer relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Saruli Gatekeepers relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Cleansing relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Ondu Greathorn relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Steppe Lynx relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Bannerhide Krushok relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.13 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Elvish Scout relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Sporemound relevance 0.33 · 71.4% (5 of 7 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.27 · 71.4% (5 of 7 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.22 · 71.4% (5 of 7 decks)
- Azure Fleet Admiral relevance 0.23 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Heliod's Pilgrim relevance 0.20 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Goliath Paladin relevance 0.22 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.19 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Prowling Felidar relevance 0.21 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Midnight Guard relevance 0.20 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Krosan Restorer relevance 0.19 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Stone-Seeder Hierophant relevance 0.19 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Clever Conjurer relevance 0.18 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.16 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.17 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Sunspire Gatekeepers relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Guardian of the Guildpact relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Simic Ragworm relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Opal Lake Gatekeepers relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Wave-Wing Elemental relevance 0.18 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.15 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Information Dealer relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Saruli Gatekeepers relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Ondu Greathorn relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Steppe Lynx relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Bannerhide Krushok relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.13 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Elvish Scout relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Wildheart Invoker relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf Seer relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Minister of Impediments relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Survivor of the Unseen relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Descendant of Soramaro relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Civic Guildmage relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Koilos Roc relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.11 · 57.1% (4 of 7 decks)
- Disciple of the Sun relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Sunscape Apprentice relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Palace Sentinels relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Mistblade Shinobi relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Crash of Rhino Beetles relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Totem-Guide Hartebeest relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Outlaw Medic relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Stonybrook Angler relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Galvanic Alchemist relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Shrine Steward relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Eyeless Watcher relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Rootwater Hunter relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Zuran Spellcaster relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Makindi Ox relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Shattered Angel relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
All artifacts (25)
- Energy Refractor relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.12 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Neurok Stealthsuit relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Viridian Longbow relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Weather Maker relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Adventuring Gear relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.06 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.06 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.05 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.05 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Talisman of Progress relevance 0.04 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.04 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.03 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.02 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.01 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.01 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
All enchantments (32)
- Journey to Nowhere relevance 0.23 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Presence of Gond relevance 0.17 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.13 · 57.1% (4 of 7 decks)
- Ior Ruin Expedition relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Concerted Effort relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Trade Routes relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Diplomatic Immunity relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Careful Cultivation relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Psychic Impetus relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Instill Energy relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Island Sanctuary relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Oblivion Ring relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Market Festival relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.08 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Retreat to Emeria relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Dawn's Reflection relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Nature's Chosen relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.07 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Land Tax relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Shield of the Oversoul relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.06 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.06 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
All instants (50)
- Capsize relevance 0.26 · 57.1% (4 of 7 decks)
- Crypsis relevance 0.23 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Sprout Swarm relevance 0.21 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.21 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.18 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.15 · 57.1% (4 of 7 decks)
- Prismatic Strands relevance 0.18 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.18 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.15 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Reaping the Rewards relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.16 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.14 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Emerald Charm relevance 0.15 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Scattered Thoughts relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.10 · 71.4% (5 of 7 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.14 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Seed of Hope relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Rest for the Weary relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Tidal Bore relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Deglamer relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Afterlife relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Moment of Valor relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Saving Grasp relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Pulse of Murasa relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Midnight Tilling relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Cache Grab relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.11 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Momentary Blink relevance 0.12 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Fleeting Reflection relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Deprive relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Twiddle relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.11 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Dizzy Spell relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.08 · 57.1% (4 of 7 decks)
- Angelsong relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Loran's Escape relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Blacksmith's Skill relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Crib Swap relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.08 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Katara's Reversal relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Thraben Charm relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
All sorceries (40)
- Mobilize relevance 0.21 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.20 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.19 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Pegasus Stampede relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.16 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.13 · 57.1% (4 of 7 decks)
- Hidden Strings relevance 0.15 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Cleansing relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.12 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.13 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Secrets of the Golden City relevance 0.14 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Reap and Sow relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.08 · 57.1% (4 of 7 decks)
- Revoke Existence relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Scout the City relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Hour of Revelation relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Lessons from Life relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Council's Judgment relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Into the North relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.08 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.05 · 71.4% (5 of 7 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.06 · 57.1% (4 of 7 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.06 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.05 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.06 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.04 · 57.1% (4 of 7 decks)
All utility lands (24)
- Tranquil Landscape relevance 0.10 · 71.4% (5 of 7 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.13 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Desert relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Secluded Steppe relevance 0.13 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.12 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.12 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.12 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.07 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.06 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.06 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Irrigated Farmland relevance 0.06 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.04 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.04 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Spara's Headquarters relevance 0.02 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.02 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
All lands (50)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.12 · 100.0% (7 of 7 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.12 · 100.0% (7 of 7 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.12 · 85.7% (6 of 7 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.13 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.13 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.13 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Idyllic Beachfront relevance 0.12 · 57.1% (4 of 7 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.13 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.11 · 57.1% (4 of 7 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.11 · 57.1% (4 of 7 decks)
- Tranquil Cove relevance 0.12 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.11 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.11 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.12 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.12 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.12 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.11 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Azorius Guildgate relevance 0.11 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Obscura Storefront relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.08 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Citadel Gate relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Tranquil Expanse relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Lonely Arroyo relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.08 · 28.6% (2 of 7 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.07 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.06 · 57.1% (4 of 7 decks)
- Thornglint Bridge relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Razortide Bridge relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Glacial Floodplain relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.05 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.05 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.04 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.04 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.04 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.02 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.02 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.02 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Skyward Eye Prophets, from 7 real Commander decks.