Cards like Kodama's Reach
2.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
100% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
100% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
3.5 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Kodama's Reach 100%
- Cultivate 100%
- Rampant Growth 50%
- Explosive Vegetation 50%
- Migration Path 50%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Grow from the Ashes, Search for Tomorrow, Shared Roots, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Seer's Sundial
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
- Seer's Sundial 50%
- Horn of Greed 50%
Cards like Ride the Shoopuf
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Virulent Emissary
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
- Virulent Emissary 50%
- Essence Warden 50%
- Social Climber 50%
Other options: Greenhouse Propagator, Prosperous Innkeeper
Cards like Garruk's Packleader
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Ancient Greenwarden
6.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
4.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.44 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Wayward Swordtooth
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
4.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.53 in other green decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 50%
- Lightning Greaves 50%
Cards like Harrow
3.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
100% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
2.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other green decks
Cards
- Harrow 100%
- Roiling Regrowth 50%
- Entish Restoration 50%
- Planar Engineering 50%
Other options: Cycle of Renewal, Scapeshift
Cards like Heroic Intervention
3.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
100% of decks run one or more
vs. 53% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
100% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
2.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 100%
- Three Visits 50%
- Skyshroud Claim 50%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Field Trip, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Hunting Wilds, Glimpse the Core
Cards like Elvish Mystic
1.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 59% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Elvish Mystic 50%
- Llanowar Elves 50%
- Fyndhorn Elves 50%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Boreal Druid, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer
All top picks (50)
- Dross Golem relevance 0.26 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Nightmare Lash relevance 0.25 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Charmed Pendant relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Staff of the Death Magus relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.10 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Social Climber relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Leyline of Vitality relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.10 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.09 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.09 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Burnished Hart relevance 0.08 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.08 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.08 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.08 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Gala Greeters relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.06 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Through the Forest Gate relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.05 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.05 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.05 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.05 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Beorn's Hospitality relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Tifa's Limit Break relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Necklace of Girion relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
All creatures (36)
- Dross Golem relevance 0.26 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Social Climber relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.09 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Burnished Hart relevance 0.08 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.08 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Gala Greeters relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.06 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.05 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Virulent Emissary relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.02 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.02 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.01 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.01 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
All artifacts (23)
- Nightmare Lash relevance 0.25 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Charmed Pendant relevance 0.17 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Staff of the Death Magus relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.10 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Colossus Hammer relevance 0.09 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.08 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.08 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Moss Diamond relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Necklace of Girion relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.02 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.02 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.02 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.01 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All enchantments (13)
- Leyline of Vitality relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.05 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Beorn's Hospitality relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.02 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All instants (11)
- Harrow relevance 0.05 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Tifa's Limit Break relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.02 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.02 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.01 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All sorceries (15)
- Farseek relevance 0.10 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Through the Forest Gate relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.05 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.03 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.03 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.02 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.02 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.02 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All utility lands (7)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.16 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.02 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (9)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.05 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.03 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.00 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Swampbenders, from 2 real Commander decks.