Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (7)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.39 · 1.1% (53 of 4,967 decks)
- Thranduil the Strategist relevance 1.22 · 1.5% (19 of 1,255 decks)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 0.85 · 1.1% (10 of 907 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 0.74 · 1.1% (7 of 638 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.47 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- The Third Doctor // Clara Oswald relevance 0.43 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.27 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.21 · 53.3% (242 of 454 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.12 · 43.4% (197 of 454 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.10 · 39.6% (180 of 454 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.08 · 34.4% (156 of 454 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.07 · 46.9% (213 of 454 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.06 · 40.3% (183 of 454 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.03 · 53.7% (244 of 454 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.01 · 44.9% (204 of 454 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.98 · 36.8% (167 of 454 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.95 · 42.5% (193 of 454 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.92 · 33.9% (154 of 454 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.92 · 33.7% (153 of 454 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.91 · 42.5% (193 of 454 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.87 · 37.0% (168 of 454 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.86 · 24.7% (112 of 454 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.85 · 20.5% (93 of 454 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.81 · 21.1% (96 of 454 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.78 · 38.3% (174 of 454 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.77 · 24.4% (111 of 454 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.77 · 55.5% (252 of 454 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.74 · 39.2% (178 of 454 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.74 · 28.2% (128 of 454 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.72 · 23.6% (107 of 454 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.72 · 22.9% (104 of 454 decks)
- Tiller Engine relevance 0.71 · 13.7% (62 of 454 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.67 · 31.7% (144 of 454 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.66 · 21.4% (97 of 454 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.66 · 17.4% (79 of 454 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.65 · 21.6% (98 of 454 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.65 · 17.0% (77 of 454 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.21 · 53.3% (242 of 454 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.12 · 43.4% (197 of 454 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.10 · 39.6% (180 of 454 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.07 · 46.9% (213 of 454 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.06 · 40.3% (183 of 454 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.03 · 53.7% (244 of 454 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.98 · 36.8% (167 of 454 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.92 · 33.9% (154 of 454 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.91 · 42.5% (193 of 454 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.78 · 38.3% (174 of 454 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.77 · 55.5% (252 of 454 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.74 · 39.2% (178 of 454 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.72 · 23.6% (107 of 454 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.72 · 22.9% (104 of 454 decks)
- Tiller Engine relevance 0.71 · 13.7% (62 of 454 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.67 · 31.7% (144 of 454 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.66 · 21.4% (97 of 454 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.66 · 17.4% (79 of 454 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.65 · 21.6% (98 of 454 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.63 · 15.0% (68 of 454 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.63 · 18.9% (86 of 454 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.63 · 16.5% (75 of 454 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.60 · 13.9% (63 of 454 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.60 · 18.1% (82 of 454 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.86 · 24.7% (112 of 454 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.85 · 20.5% (93 of 454 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.60 · 18.5% (84 of 454 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Spelunking relevance 1.08 · 34.4% (156 of 454 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.01 · 44.9% (204 of 454 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.92 · 33.7% (153 of 454 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.74 · 28.2% (128 of 454 decks)
All instants (3)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.95 · 42.5% (193 of 454 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.87 · 37.0% (168 of 454 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.64 · 24.4% (111 of 454 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.81 · 21.1% (96 of 454 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.77 · 24.4% (111 of 454 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.65 · 17.0% (77 of 454 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.60 · 19.2% (87 of 454 decks)
All utility lands (6)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.94 · 28.6% (130 of 454 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.83 · 25.1% (114 of 454 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.81 · 27.8% (126 of 454 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.67 · 23.3% (106 of 454 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.67 · 17.6% (80 of 454 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (76 of 454 decks)
All lands (6)
- Vesuva relevance 0.83 · 26.7% (121 of 454 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.83 · 47.6% (216 of 454 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.74 · 46.5% (211 of 454 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.73 · 45.4% (206 of 454 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.68 · 41.0% (186 of 454 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.66 · 22.0% (100 of 454 decks)
EDH data for Rootpath Purifier: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 454 real decks.