930+31+2+5+4+4+1+3+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Omnath, Locus of Creation 54.3% of decks
Omnath, Locus of Creation 54.3% of decks
Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis 8.2% of decks
Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis 8.2% of decks
Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Tana, the Bloodsower 6.7% of decks
Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Tana, the Bloodsower 6.7% of decks
Invisible Woman 3.8% of decks
Invisible Woman 3.8% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 3.1% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 3.1% of decks
The Fantastic Four 2.1% of decks
The Fantastic Four 2.1% of decks
Most Relevant
Omnath, Locus of Rage 74.6% of decks
Omnath, Locus of Rage 74.6% of decks
Scute Swarm 75.5% of decks
Scute Swarm 75.5% of decks
Lotus Cobra 71.8% of decks
Lotus Cobra 71.8% of decks
Avenger of Zendikar 67.2% of decks
Avenger of Zendikar 67.2% of decks
Rampaging Baloths 61.7% of decks
Rampaging Baloths 61.7% of decks
Ancient Greenwarden 65.6% of decks
Ancient Greenwarden 65.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (9)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.67 · 54.3% (5,008 of 9,229 decks)
- Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis relevance 0.63 · 8.2% (842 of 10,316 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.22 · 6.7% (15 of 224 decks)
- Invisible Woman relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (38 of 1,004 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (13 of 420 decks)
- The Fantastic Four relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (31 of 1,467 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (7 of 196 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.10 · 5.7% (3 of 53 decks)
- The Thing relevance 0.06 · 1.6% (15 of 955 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.44 · 74.6% (4,566 of 6,119 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.44 · 75.5% (4,621 of 6,119 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.38 · 71.8% (4,391 of 6,119 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.37 · 67.2% (4,111 of 6,119 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.36 · 61.7% (3,777 of 6,119 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.35 · 65.6% (4,016 of 6,119 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.29 · 81.7% (4,998 of 6,119 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.28 · 67.0% (4,099 of 6,119 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.28 · 64.0% (3,917 of 6,119 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.22 · 53.9% (3,299 of 6,119 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.21 · 52.1% (3,186 of 6,119 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.18 · 59.1% (3,618 of 6,119 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.18 · 49.0% (2,996 of 6,119 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 1.14 · 44.1% (2,696 of 6,119 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.13 · 48.8% (2,989 of 6,119 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.13 · 49.9% (3,056 of 6,119 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.08 · 64.0% (3,917 of 6,119 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.08 · 43.8% (2,683 of 6,119 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.05 · 41.6% (2,546 of 6,119 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.02 · 50.2% (3,069 of 6,119 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.01 · 36.7% (2,247 of 6,119 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.99 · 34.5% (2,113 of 6,119 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.98 · 37.6% (2,299 of 6,119 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.98 · 35.7% (2,183 of 6,119 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.98 · 36.8% (2,253 of 6,119 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.93 · 34.4% (2,104 of 6,119 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.93 · 36.9% (2,257 of 6,119 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.92 · 33.7% (2,063 of 6,119 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.91 · 32.7% (2,000 of 6,119 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.87 · 30.2% (1,845 of 6,119 decks)
All creatures (31)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.44 · 74.6% (4,566 of 6,119 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.44 · 75.5% (4,621 of 6,119 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.38 · 71.8% (4,391 of 6,119 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.37 · 67.2% (4,111 of 6,119 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.36 · 61.7% (3,777 of 6,119 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.35 · 65.6% (4,016 of 6,119 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.29 · 81.7% (4,998 of 6,119 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.28 · 67.0% (4,099 of 6,119 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.28 · 64.0% (3,917 of 6,119 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.22 · 53.9% (3,299 of 6,119 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.21 · 52.1% (3,186 of 6,119 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.18 · 59.1% (3,618 of 6,119 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.18 · 49.0% (2,996 of 6,119 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 1.14 · 44.1% (2,696 of 6,119 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.13 · 48.8% (2,989 of 6,119 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.08 · 64.0% (3,917 of 6,119 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.08 · 43.8% (2,683 of 6,119 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.05 · 41.6% (2,546 of 6,119 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.98 · 37.6% (2,299 of 6,119 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.98 · 36.8% (2,253 of 6,119 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.92 · 33.7% (2,063 of 6,119 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.91 · 32.7% (2,000 of 6,119 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.84 · 28.5% (1,744 of 6,119 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.84 · 34.3% (2,098 of 6,119 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 0.84 · 26.6% (1,626 of 6,119 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.80 · 29.0% (1,772 of 6,119 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.77 · 25.4% (1,556 of 6,119 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 0.77 · 24.6% (1,504 of 6,119 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.74 · 24.3% (1,488 of 6,119 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.73 · 24.6% (1,505 of 6,119 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.73 · 26.4% (1,614 of 6,119 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.93 · 34.4% (2,104 of 6,119 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.93 · 36.9% (2,257 of 6,119 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Exploration relevance 1.02 · 50.2% (3,069 of 6,119 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.01 · 36.7% (2,247 of 6,119 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.99 · 34.5% (2,113 of 6,119 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.98 · 35.7% (2,183 of 6,119 decks)
- Dragonback Assault relevance 0.74 · 24.7% (1,511 of 6,119 decks)
All instants (4)
- Harrow relevance 1.13 · 49.9% (3,056 of 6,119 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.87 · 30.2% (1,845 of 6,119 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.82 · 46.5% (2,847 of 6,119 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.76 · 32.2% (1,968 of 6,119 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.85 · 30.1% (1,844 of 6,119 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.81 · 28.4% (1,738 of 6,119 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.77 · 32.9% (2,014 of 6,119 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.77 · 46.0% (2,814 of 6,119 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.87 · 33.7% (2,062 of 6,119 decks)
All lands (3)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 1.00 · 49.9% (3,053 of 6,119 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.96 · 44.9% (2,746 of 6,119 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.93 · 42.3% (2,588 of 6,119 decks)
EDH data for Felidar Retreat: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 6,119 real decks.







































