Tectonic Edge
Played in 632 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
3.0% Jund
- Five-Color 5,351 · 25.6%
- Colorless 2,080 · 10.0%
- Green 1,186 · 5.7%
- White 1,130 · 5.4%
- Red 1,070 · 5.1%
- Black 810 · 3.9%
- Blue 759 · 3.6%
- Golgari 751 · 3.6%
- Gruul 727 · 3.5%
- Azorius 636 · 3.0%
- Jund 632 · 3.0%
- Simic 574 · 2.7%
- Sultai 447 · 2.1%
- Rakdos 442 · 2.1%
- Orzhov 421 · 2.0%
- Other (17) 3,885 · 18.6%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (5)
- Soul of Windgrace relevance 1.92 · 4.2% (47 of 1,110 decks)
- Lord Windgrace relevance 1.73 · 2.1% (101 of 4,902 decks)
- Gyrus, Waker of Corpses relevance 0.63 · 1.2% (8 of 674 decks)
- Darigaaz Reincarnated relevance 0.48 · 1.7% (3 of 172 decks)
- Krark, the Thumbless // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.23 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.90 · 43.0% (272 of 632 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.82 · 51.3% (324 of 632 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.75 · 40.3% (255 of 632 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.73 · 26.3% (166 of 632 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.73 · 29.7% (188 of 632 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.72 · 46.0% (291 of 632 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.70 · 31.8% (201 of 632 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.69 · 35.8% (226 of 632 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.69 · 39.7% (251 of 632 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.66 · 28.2% (178 of 632 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.64 · 35.4% (224 of 632 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.64 · 26.9% (170 of 632 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.63 · 25.2% (159 of 632 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.61 · 29.9% (189 of 632 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.58 · 29.0% (183 of 632 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.58 · 27.7% (175 of 632 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.56 · 27.1% (171 of 632 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.56 · 27.8% (176 of 632 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.56 · 23.4% (148 of 632 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.55 · 29.4% (186 of 632 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.54 · 17.6% (111 of 632 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.53 · 26.1% (165 of 632 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.53 · 23.7% (150 of 632 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.52 · 28.0% (177 of 632 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.51 · 21.2% (134 of 632 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.51 · 18.7% (118 of 632 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.50 · 15.7% (99 of 632 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.49 · 24.2% (153 of 632 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.49 · 29.6% (187 of 632 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.48 · 32.9% (208 of 632 decks)
All creatures (25)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.90 · 43.0% (272 of 632 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.82 · 51.3% (324 of 632 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.75 · 40.3% (255 of 632 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.73 · 26.3% (166 of 632 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.70 · 31.8% (201 of 632 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.64 · 35.4% (224 of 632 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.63 · 25.2% (159 of 632 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.61 · 29.9% (189 of 632 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.58 · 29.0% (183 of 632 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.58 · 27.7% (175 of 632 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.56 · 27.1% (171 of 632 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.55 · 29.4% (186 of 632 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.53 · 26.1% (165 of 632 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.53 · 23.7% (150 of 632 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.52 · 28.0% (177 of 632 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.51 · 21.2% (134 of 632 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.51 · 18.7% (118 of 632 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.49 · 24.2% (153 of 632 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.49 · 29.6% (187 of 632 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.48 · 32.9% (208 of 632 decks)
- Braids, Arisen Nightmare relevance 0.48 · 30.2% (191 of 632 decks)
- Army Ants relevance 0.48 · 8.7% (55 of 632 decks)
- Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 0.48 · 22.9% (145 of 632 decks)
- Soul of Windgrace relevance 0.47 · 20.6% (130 of 632 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.46 · 17.6% (111 of 632 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.73 · 29.7% (188 of 632 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.66 · 28.2% (178 of 632 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.56 · 27.8% (176 of 632 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Exploration relevance 0.56 · 23.4% (148 of 632 decks)
- Destructive Flow relevance 0.47 · 9.0% (57 of 632 decks)
All instants (3)
- Harrow relevance 0.72 · 46.0% (291 of 632 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.69 · 35.8% (226 of 632 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.54 · 17.6% (111 of 632 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.69 · 39.7% (251 of 632 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.64 · 26.9% (170 of 632 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.50 · 15.7% (99 of 632 decks)
- Wildfire relevance 0.48 · 9.3% (59 of 632 decks)
All utility lands (10)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 1.44 · 35.6% (225 of 632 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.93 · 21.2% (134 of 632 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.86 · 32.4% (205 of 632 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.78 · 22.8% (144 of 632 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.77 · 16.1% (102 of 632 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.66 · 19.9% (126 of 632 decks)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.63 · 12.3% (78 of 632 decks)
- Twisted Landscape relevance 0.48 · 26.7% (169 of 632 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.48 · 18.4% (116 of 632 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.47 · 13.0% (82 of 632 decks)
All lands (3)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.58 · 46.0% (291 of 632 decks)
- Jund Panorama relevance 0.56 · 16.5% (104 of 632 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.53 · 20.4% (129 of 632 decks)
EDH data for Tectonic Edge: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 632 real decks.