Tectonic Edge
Played in 1,183 Green decks
3021+10+4+1+2+4+18+11+
Color Identity Spread
5.7% Green
-
Five-Color 5,332 · 25.6%
-
Colorless 2,070 · 9.9%
-
Green 1,183 · 5.7%
-
White 1,123 · 5.4%
-
Red 1,066 · 5.1%
-
Black 809 · 3.9%
-
Blue 756 · 3.6%
-
Golgari 751 · 3.6%
-
Gruul 724 · 3.5%
-
Azorius 631 · 3.0%
-
Jund 631 · 3.0%
-
Simic 573 · 2.8%
-
Sultai 446 · 2.1%
-
Rakdos 442 · 2.1%
-
Orzhov 419 · 2.0%
- Other (17) 3,880 · 18.6%
Commanders
Titania, Protector of Argoth 11.3% of decks
Titania, Protector of Argoth 11.3% of decks
Azusa, Lost but Seeking 3.8% of decks
Azusa, Lost but Seeking 3.8% of decks
Shigeki, Jukai Visionary 5.6% of decks
Shigeki, Jukai Visionary 5.6% of decks
Lumra, Bellow of the Woods 2.5% of decks
Lumra, Bellow of the Woods 2.5% of decks
Titania, Voice of Gaea 3.2% of decks
Titania, Voice of Gaea 3.2% of decks
Marwyn, the Preserver 6.8% of decks
Marwyn, the Preserver 6.8% of decks
Most Relevant
Zuran Orb 29.7% of decks
Zuran Orb 29.7% of decks
Sylvan Scrying 25.5% of decks
Sylvan Scrying 25.5% of decks
Ramunap Excavator 31.3% of decks
Ramunap Excavator 31.3% of decks
Expedition Map 18.9% of decks
Expedition Map 18.9% of decks
Elvish Reclaimer 22.9% of decks
Elvish Reclaimer 22.9% of decks
Sylvan Safekeeper 29.6% of decks
Sylvan Safekeeper 29.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.86 · 11.3% (151 of 1,341 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.90 · 3.8% (144 of 3,765 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 1.79 · 5.6% (55 of 986 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.58 · 2.5% (156 of 6,343 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 1.16 · 3.2% (26 of 811 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 0.86 · 6.8% (5 of 74 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 0.56 · 2.5% (5 of 199 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.56 · 1.7% (8 of 475 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.56 · 2.1% (6 of 286 decks)
- Sachi, Daughter of Seshiro relevance 0.55 · 2.4% (5 of 210 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.55 · 1.3% (11 of 857 decks)
- Avatar Kyoshi, Earthbender relevance 0.54 · 1.3% (11 of 864 decks)
- Dosan the Falling Leaf relevance 0.53 · 2.8% (4 of 143 decks)
- Ruric Thar, Magecrusher relevance 0.51 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Nakia, Wakandan Operative relevance 0.49 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 0.49 · 2.4% (4 of 169 decks)
- Haru, Hidden Talent relevance 0.48 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.46 · 1.3% (7 of 535 decks)
- Sosuke, Son of Seshiro relevance 0.46 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Imaryll, Elfhame Elite relevance 0.45 · 2.0% (4 of 203 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 0.44 · 2.5% (3 of 120 decks)
- Seton, Krosan Protector relevance 0.42 · 1.1% (7 of 625 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.37 · 1.8% (3 of 165 decks)
- Susan Foreman relevance 0.37 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.35 · 1.3% (4 of 317 decks)
- Toph, the Blind Bandit relevance 0.35 · 1.6% (3 of 188 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 0.34 · 2.5% (2 of 81 decks)
- Benjamin Sisko, Besieged relevance 0.32 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Rhonas the Indomitable relevance 0.31 · 1.0% (4 of 381 decks)
- Zuri, Warrior of Wakanda relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
All most relevant (21)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.82 · 29.7% (351 of 1,183 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.81 · 25.5% (302 of 1,183 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.78 · 31.3% (370 of 1,183 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.68 · 18.9% (223 of 1,183 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.68 · 22.9% (271 of 1,183 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.67 · 29.6% (350 of 1,183 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.66 · 38.5% (456 of 1,183 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.60 · 30.0% (355 of 1,183 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.60 · 31.1% (368 of 1,183 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.60 · 20.0% (237 of 1,183 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.59 · 32.9% (389 of 1,183 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.59 · 26.4% (312 of 1,183 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.59 · 17.3% (205 of 1,183 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.59 · 28.6% (338 of 1,183 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.58 · 14.8% (175 of 1,183 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.57 · 21.6% (256 of 1,183 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.55 · 23.2% (274 of 1,183 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.55 · 29.4% (348 of 1,183 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.55 · 28.6% (338 of 1,183 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.55 · 19.3% (228 of 1,183 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.54 · 17.4% (206 of 1,183 decks)
All creatures (10)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.78 · 31.3% (370 of 1,183 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.68 · 22.9% (271 of 1,183 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.67 · 29.6% (350 of 1,183 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.60 · 30.0% (355 of 1,183 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.60 · 31.1% (368 of 1,183 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.59 · 26.4% (312 of 1,183 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.59 · 28.6% (338 of 1,183 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.55 · 23.2% (274 of 1,183 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.55 · 28.6% (338 of 1,183 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.55 · 19.3% (228 of 1,183 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.82 · 29.7% (351 of 1,183 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.68 · 18.9% (223 of 1,183 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.60 · 20.0% (237 of 1,183 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.57 · 21.6% (256 of 1,183 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Exploration relevance 0.55 · 29.4% (348 of 1,183 decks)
All instants (2)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.66 · 38.5% (456 of 1,183 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.59 · 32.9% (389 of 1,183 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.81 · 25.5% (302 of 1,183 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.59 · 17.3% (205 of 1,183 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.58 · 14.8% (175 of 1,183 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.54 · 17.4% (206 of 1,183 decks)
All utility lands (18)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 1.25 · 42.2% (499 of 1,183 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 1.05 · 22.0% (260 of 1,183 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.77 · 19.1% (226 of 1,183 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.76 · 24.9% (294 of 1,183 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.75 · 27.3% (323 of 1,183 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.72 · 18.9% (224 of 1,183 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.72 · 25.8% (305 of 1,183 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.70 · 21.1% (250 of 1,183 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.64 · 17.6% (208 of 1,183 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.63 · 15.6% (185 of 1,183 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.63 · 18.3% (217 of 1,183 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.63 · 23.8% (282 of 1,183 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.60 · 16.5% (195 of 1,183 decks)
- Cryptic Caves relevance 0.58 · 12.7% (150 of 1,183 decks)
- Rishadan Port relevance 0.56 · 8.5% (100 of 1,183 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.55 · 16.3% (193 of 1,183 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.54 · 22.9% (271 of 1,183 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.54 · 19.2% (227 of 1,183 decks)
All lands (11)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.74 · 22.1% (261 of 1,183 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.74 · 25.2% (298 of 1,183 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.68 · 35.0% (414 of 1,183 decks)
- Havenwood Battleground relevance 0.67 · 18.8% (222 of 1,183 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.62 · 24.3% (287 of 1,183 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.61 · 18.8% (222 of 1,183 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.59 · 16.4% (194 of 1,183 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.58 · 16.9% (200 of 1,183 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.57 · 24.8% (293 of 1,183 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.55 · 23.7% (280 of 1,183 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.55 · 22.9% (271 of 1,183 decks)
EDH data for Tectonic Edge: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,183 real decks.




































































