Color Identity Spread
All commanders (29)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 2.66 · 42.7% (374 of 875 decks)
- Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 2.54 · 22.8% (1,603 of 7,046 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.47 · 20.5% (1,883 of 9,202 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.43 · 23.2% (1,091 of 4,711 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 2.37 · 32.2% (369 of 1,147 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 1.91 · 19.6% (376 of 1,916 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 1.82 · 52.5% (42 of 80 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 1.80 · 24.8% (152 of 613 decks)
- Grolnok, the Omnivore relevance 1.73 · 14.5% (538 of 3,714 decks)
- Thranduil the Strategist relevance 1.55 · 16.3% (197 of 1,207 decks)
- Tam, Observant Sequencer // Deep Sight relevance 1.54 · 19.9% (115 of 578 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 1.30 · 8.5% (596 of 6,991 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 1.29 · 13.5% (125 of 925 decks)
- Zimone, All-Questioning relevance 1.13 · 12.5% (82 of 655 decks)
- Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 1.12 · 9.7% (155 of 1,590 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 1.05 · 9.7% (116 of 1,191 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Master Chef relevance 0.91 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.91 · 11.8% (38 of 321 decks)
- Omega, Heartless Evolution relevance 0.84 · 9.1% (52 of 574 decks)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 0.83 · 10.1% (38 of 376 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.71 · 6.6% (59 of 888 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.63 · 23.8% (5 of 21 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.59 · 11.9% (10 of 84 decks)
- Gretchen Titchwillow relevance 0.58 · 5.0% (53 of 1,053 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.57 · 9.4% (13 of 138 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.57 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 0.56 · 4.7% (56 of 1,183 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.54 · 11.6% (8 of 69 decks)
- Ignis Scientia relevance 0.50 · 8.3% (11 of 132 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.32 · 58.3% (5,631 of 9,652 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.18 · 42.5% (4,101 of 9,652 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.18 · 51.5% (4,972 of 9,652 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.12 · 49.8% (4,806 of 9,652 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.02 · 39.0% (3,765 of 9,652 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.02 · 53.5% (5,165 of 9,652 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.02 · 39.5% (3,810 of 9,652 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.01 · 38.0% (3,672 of 9,652 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.97 · 45.3% (4,371 of 9,652 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.96 · 35.4% (3,419 of 9,652 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.89 · 25.7% (2,484 of 9,652 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.88 · 39.5% (3,813 of 9,652 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.88 · 46.2% (4,459 of 9,652 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.88 · 29.1% (2,806 of 9,652 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.86 · 22.6% (2,183 of 9,652 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.83 · 25.5% (2,463 of 9,652 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.82 · 35.2% (3,393 of 9,652 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.82 · 59.4% (5,730 of 9,652 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.79 · 28.8% (2,778 of 9,652 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.78 · 27.8% (2,685 of 9,652 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.76 · 36.2% (3,497 of 9,652 decks)
- Six relevance 0.72 · 18.0% (1,739 of 9,652 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.71 · 22.8% (2,205 of 9,652 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.70 · 18.5% (1,784 of 9,652 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.69 · 33.9% (3,273 of 9,652 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.69 · 26.4% (2,544 of 9,652 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.68 · 21.9% (2,112 of 9,652 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.67 · 16.3% (1,574 of 9,652 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.66 · 17.1% (1,650 of 9,652 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.66 · 17.3% (1,666 of 9,652 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.32 · 58.3% (5,631 of 9,652 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.18 · 42.5% (4,101 of 9,652 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.18 · 51.5% (4,972 of 9,652 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.02 · 39.0% (3,765 of 9,652 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.02 · 53.5% (5,165 of 9,652 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.02 · 39.5% (3,810 of 9,652 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.01 · 38.0% (3,672 of 9,652 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.97 · 45.3% (4,371 of 9,652 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.96 · 35.4% (3,419 of 9,652 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.88 · 46.2% (4,459 of 9,652 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.88 · 29.1% (2,806 of 9,652 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.86 · 22.6% (2,183 of 9,652 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.82 · 59.4% (5,730 of 9,652 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.78 · 27.8% (2,685 of 9,652 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.76 · 36.2% (3,497 of 9,652 decks)
- Six relevance 0.72 · 18.0% (1,739 of 9,652 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.71 · 22.8% (2,205 of 9,652 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.70 · 18.5% (1,784 of 9,652 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.69 · 33.9% (3,273 of 9,652 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.67 · 16.3% (1,574 of 9,652 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.66 · 17.3% (1,666 of 9,652 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.65 · 15.7% (1,515 of 9,652 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.63 · 19.0% (1,831 of 9,652 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.62 · 32.2% (3,107 of 9,652 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.89 · 25.7% (2,484 of 9,652 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.83 · 25.5% (2,463 of 9,652 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.64 · 16.2% (1,567 of 9,652 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Exploration relevance 1.12 · 49.8% (4,806 of 9,652 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.79 · 28.8% (2,778 of 9,652 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.68 · 21.9% (2,112 of 9,652 decks)
All instants (3)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.88 · 39.5% (3,813 of 9,652 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.82 · 35.2% (3,393 of 9,652 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.69 · 26.4% (2,544 of 9,652 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.66 · 17.1% (1,650 of 9,652 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.63 · 15.5% (1,493 of 9,652 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.74 · 22.5% (2,174 of 9,652 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.69 · 38.8% (3,744 of 9,652 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.66 · 38.0% (3,664 of 9,652 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.63 · 21.3% (2,058 of 9,652 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (1,613 of 9,652 decks)
All lands (10)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.78 · 48.4% (4,676 of 9,652 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.70 · 55.8% (5,381 of 9,652 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.70 · 30.2% (2,918 of 9,652 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.69 · 24.9% (2,404 of 9,652 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.68 · 42.1% (4,065 of 9,652 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.67 · 27.7% (2,669 of 9,652 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.64 · 26.1% (2,515 of 9,652 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.63 · 38.2% (3,691 of 9,652 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.62 · 27.7% (2,678 of 9,652 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.61 · 26.3% (2,535 of 9,652 decks)
EDH data for Icetill Explorer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 9,652 real decks.