Color Identity Spread
All commanders (26)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.79 · 40.2% (1,481 of 3,682 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.31 · 29.2% (1,258 of 4,310 decks)
- Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 2.22 · 9.5% (2,559 of 26,803 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 2.03 · 17.2% (226 of 1,314 decks)
- Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 1.96 · 14.8% (268 of 1,812 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 1.72 · 33.7% (33 of 98 decks)
- Hazezon Tamar relevance 1.23 · 12.2% (45 of 368 decks)
- Eivor, Wolf-Kissed relevance 0.69 · 4.7% (39 of 831 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 0.68 · 3.4% (86 of 2,518 decks)
- Annie Flash, the Veteran relevance 0.57 · 4.5% (21 of 468 decks)
- Rocco, Cabaretti Caterer relevance 0.33 · 1.4% (73 of 5,395 decks)
- Ghired, Mirror of the Wilds relevance 0.20 · 1.0% (29 of 2,863 decks)
- Havi, the All-Father relevance 0.20 · 1.4% (12 of 874 decks)
- Samut, Voice of Dissent relevance 0.17 · 1.2% (12 of 1,013 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The War Doctor relevance 0.16 · 1.9% (4 of 206 decks)
- Johan relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (3 of 147 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (2 of 77 decks)
- Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant relevance 0.12 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.12 · 1.6% (3 of 188 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Palladia-Mors relevance 0.10 · 1.8% (2 of 113 decks)
- Val, Marooned Surveyor relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Yoshimaru, Ever Faithful // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.08 · 1.3% (2 of 153 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.04 · 1.1% (1 of 90 decks)
- Jacques le Vert relevance 0.04 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.44 · 44.9% (2,986 of 6,650 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.43 · 44.2% (2,938 of 6,650 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.39 · 53.8% (3,578 of 6,650 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.38 · 53.1% (3,534 of 6,650 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.34 · 49.4% (3,287 of 6,650 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.32 · 40.5% (2,696 of 6,650 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.27 · 43.7% (2,908 of 6,650 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.25 · 33.6% (2,233 of 6,650 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.19 · 33.4% (2,222 of 6,650 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.18 · 45.2% (3,005 of 6,650 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.17 · 47.2% (3,142 of 6,650 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.17 · 35.5% (2,358 of 6,650 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.16 · 30.1% (2,004 of 6,650 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.15 · 49.9% (3,317 of 6,650 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.14 · 34.3% (2,284 of 6,650 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.13 · 33.8% (2,250 of 6,650 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.10 · 25.8% (1,716 of 6,650 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.10 · 34.8% (2,312 of 6,650 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.07 · 29.1% (1,936 of 6,650 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.07 · 28.9% (1,924 of 6,650 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.06 · 30.1% (2,003 of 6,650 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.05 · 27.0% (1,796 of 6,650 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.04 · 46.3% (3,077 of 6,650 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.03 · 39.0% (2,596 of 6,650 decks)
- Six relevance 0.99 · 23.7% (1,578 of 6,650 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.98 · 25.1% (1,668 of 6,650 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.97 · 24.6% (1,634 of 6,650 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.95 · 25.6% (1,700 of 6,650 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.95 · 23.0% (1,529 of 6,650 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.94 · 33.7% (2,238 of 6,650 decks)
All creatures (18)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.44 · 44.9% (2,986 of 6,650 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.43 · 44.2% (2,938 of 6,650 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.39 · 53.8% (3,578 of 6,650 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.34 · 49.4% (3,287 of 6,650 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.32 · 40.5% (2,696 of 6,650 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.27 · 43.7% (2,908 of 6,650 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.19 · 33.4% (2,222 of 6,650 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.18 · 45.2% (3,005 of 6,650 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.17 · 35.5% (2,358 of 6,650 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.15 · 49.9% (3,317 of 6,650 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.13 · 33.8% (2,250 of 6,650 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.10 · 25.8% (1,716 of 6,650 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.07 · 28.9% (1,924 of 6,650 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.04 · 46.3% (3,077 of 6,650 decks)
- Six relevance 0.99 · 23.7% (1,578 of 6,650 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.95 · 23.0% (1,529 of 6,650 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.94 · 33.7% (2,238 of 6,650 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.91 · 30.5% (2,030 of 6,650 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.38 · 53.1% (3,534 of 6,650 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.07 · 29.1% (1,936 of 6,650 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.05 · 27.0% (1,796 of 6,650 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.95 · 25.6% (1,700 of 6,650 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.25 · 33.6% (2,233 of 6,650 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.14 · 34.3% (2,284 of 6,650 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.10 · 34.8% (2,312 of 6,650 decks)
All instants (2)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.17 · 47.2% (3,142 of 6,650 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.03 · 39.0% (2,596 of 6,650 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.16 · 30.1% (2,004 of 6,650 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.06 · 30.1% (2,003 of 6,650 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.98 · 25.1% (1,668 of 6,650 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.97 · 24.6% (1,634 of 6,650 decks)
All utility lands (12)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 1.35 · 40.0% (2,661 of 6,650 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 1.35 · 39.4% (2,617 of 6,650 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 1.33 · 38.9% (2,587 of 6,650 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 1.33 · 39.2% (2,607 of 6,650 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 1.33 · 39.2% (2,604 of 6,650 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 1.33 · 39.2% (2,609 of 6,650 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 1.32 · 38.0% (2,529 of 6,650 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 1.30 · 37.4% (2,486 of 6,650 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 1.27 · 36.5% (2,428 of 6,650 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 1.20 · 32.7% (2,177 of 6,650 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 1.00 · 27.6% (1,838 of 6,650 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.98 · 29.7% (1,977 of 6,650 decks)
All lands (7)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 1.27 · 40.1% (2,669 of 6,650 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 1.27 · 40.0% (2,662 of 6,650 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 1.25 · 39.3% (2,611 of 6,650 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 1.16 · 32.9% (2,190 of 6,650 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 1.08 · 29.4% (1,956 of 6,650 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 1.05 · 27.5% (1,827 of 6,650 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.93 · 27.3% (1,816 of 6,650 decks)
EDH data for Icetill Explorer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 6,650 real decks.