Excavator
Played in 35 Green decks
330+15+4+2+6+6+1+7+9+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Zuran Orb 54.3% of decks
Zuran Orb 54.3% of decks
Baloth Prime 28.6% of decks
Baloth Prime 28.6% of decks
Edge of Autumn 25.7% of decks
Edge of Autumn 25.7% of decks
Cycle of Renewal 40.0% of decks
Cycle of Renewal 40.0% of decks
Roiling Regrowth 42.9% of decks
Roiling Regrowth 42.9% of decks
Harrow 60.0% of decks
Harrow 60.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Ayumi, the Last Visitor relevance 0.62 · 2.0% (1 of 49 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 0.57 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
- Harold and Bob, First Numens relevance 0.56 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.50 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Baloth Prime relevance 1.33 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 1.22 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 1.18 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.14 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.08 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.05 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 1.04 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.99 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.97 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.92 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.91 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.84 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.82 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.80 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.78 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.76 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.76 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.76 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.74 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.73 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.73 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.69 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.67 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.67 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.66 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.59 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.58 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.57 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.53 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Baloth Prime relevance 1.33 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.91 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.84 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.82 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.76 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.76 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.74 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.69 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.67 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.58 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.57 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.53 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.52 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.51 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.51 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.50 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.05 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.80 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.76 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Druid Class relevance 0.73 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.59 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
All instants (6)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 1.18 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.14 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.08 · 60.0% (21 of 35 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 1.04 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.92 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.73 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 1.22 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.99 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.97 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.78 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.67 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.66 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.53 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.89 · 31.4% (11 of 35 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.71 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.71 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.70 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.68 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.64 · 42.9% (15 of 35 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.61 · 37.1% (13 of 35 decks)
All lands (9)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 1.15 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 1.10 · 40.0% (14 of 35 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 1.04 · 51.4% (18 of 35 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 1.02 · 54.3% (19 of 35 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.96 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.93 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.75 · 25.7% (9 of 35 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.66 · 34.3% (12 of 35 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.60 · 22.9% (8 of 35 decks)
EDH data for Excavator: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 35 real decks.


















































