Abundance
Played in 1,299 Jund decks
1630+24+5+5+4+3+4+5+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Lord Windgrace 4.7% of decks
Lord Windgrace 4.7% of decks
Soul of Windgrace 7.4% of decks
Soul of Windgrace 7.4% of decks
Hearthhull, the Worldseed 1.5% of decks
Hearthhull, the Worldseed 1.5% of decks
Vial Smasher the Fierce // Kodama of the East Tree 5.3% of decks
Vial Smasher the Fierce // Kodama of the East Tree 5.3% of decks
Szarel, Genesis Shepherd 1.1% of decks
Szarel, Genesis Shepherd 1.1% of decks
Yurlok of Scorch Thrash 1.0% of decks
Yurlok of Scorch Thrash 1.0% of decks
Most Relevant
Cultivator Colossus 30.7% of decks
Cultivator Colossus 30.7% of decks
The Gitrog Monster 56.8% of decks
The Gitrog Monster 56.8% of decks
Azusa, Lost but Seeking 41.1% of decks
Azusa, Lost but Seeking 41.1% of decks
Dryad of the Ilysian Grove 34.9% of decks
Dryad of the Ilysian Grove 34.9% of decks
Splendid Reclamation 49.6% of decks
Splendid Reclamation 49.6% of decks
Scute Swarm 40.3% of decks
Scute Swarm 40.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (16)
- Lord Windgrace relevance 2.13 · 4.7% (230 of 4,893 decks)
- Soul of Windgrace relevance 2.07 · 7.4% (82 of 1,108 decks)
- Hearthhull, the Worldseed relevance 1.31 · 1.5% (390 of 26,350 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.99 · 5.3% (10 of 188 decks)
- Szarel, Genesis Shepherd relevance 0.76 · 1.1% (65 of 5,945 decks)
- Yurlok of Scorch Thrash relevance 0.75 · 1.0% (73 of 7,106 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.70 · 3.8% (6 of 156 decks)
- Thantis, the Warweaver relevance 0.69 · 1.1% (44 of 4,008 decks)
- Vaevictis Asmadi, the Dire relevance 0.65 · 1.3% (26 of 2,065 decks)
- Xira Arien relevance 0.56 · 2.1% (7 of 332 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.47 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Darigaaz, the Igniter relevance 0.46 · 2.4% (4 of 165 decks)
- Vaevictis Asmadi relevance 0.43 · 2.1% (4 of 190 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.24 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.16 · 1.6% (1 of 62 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.16 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 1.38 · 30.7% (399 of 1,299 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.91 · 56.8% (738 of 1,299 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.91 · 41.1% (534 of 1,299 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.87 · 34.9% (454 of 1,299 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.86 · 49.6% (644 of 1,299 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.84 · 40.3% (523 of 1,299 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.84 · 31.7% (412 of 1,299 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.84 · 41.1% (534 of 1,299 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.82 · 34.3% (446 of 1,299 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.82 · 40.4% (525 of 1,299 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.81 · 38.8% (504 of 1,299 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.78 · 40.1% (521 of 1,299 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.77 · 29.2% (379 of 1,299 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.76 · 31.0% (403 of 1,299 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.75 · 36.1% (469 of 1,299 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.75 · 37.1% (482 of 1,299 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.74 · 40.9% (531 of 1,299 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.73 · 30.9% (402 of 1,299 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.73 · 39.3% (511 of 1,299 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.72 · 23.7% (308 of 1,299 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.72 · 38.6% (501 of 1,299 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.70 · 37.8% (491 of 1,299 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.70 · 29.6% (385 of 1,299 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.70 · 31.5% (409 of 1,299 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.69 · 43.8% (569 of 1,299 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.67 · 24.4% (317 of 1,299 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.66 · 23.6% (307 of 1,299 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.66 · 22.6% (293 of 1,299 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.65 · 31.6% (410 of 1,299 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.65 · 39.1% (508 of 1,299 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 1.38 · 30.7% (399 of 1,299 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.91 · 56.8% (738 of 1,299 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.91 · 41.1% (534 of 1,299 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.87 · 34.9% (454 of 1,299 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.84 · 40.3% (523 of 1,299 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.84 · 31.7% (412 of 1,299 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.84 · 41.1% (534 of 1,299 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.81 · 38.8% (504 of 1,299 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.75 · 36.1% (469 of 1,299 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.75 · 37.1% (482 of 1,299 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.74 · 40.9% (531 of 1,299 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.73 · 39.3% (511 of 1,299 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.72 · 38.6% (501 of 1,299 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.70 · 37.8% (491 of 1,299 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.70 · 31.5% (409 of 1,299 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.66 · 23.6% (307 of 1,299 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.66 · 22.6% (293 of 1,299 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.65 · 31.6% (410 of 1,299 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.65 · 39.1% (508 of 1,299 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.62 · 23.0% (299 of 1,299 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.62 · 19.2% (250 of 1,299 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.60 · 15.8% (205 of 1,299 decks)
- Six relevance 0.58 · 25.6% (333 of 1,299 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.57 · 29.9% (388 of 1,299 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.82 · 40.4% (525 of 1,299 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.76 · 31.0% (403 of 1,299 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.73 · 30.9% (402 of 1,299 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.57 · 17.7% (230 of 1,299 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.54 · 29.3% (380 of 1,299 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Exploration relevance 0.82 · 34.3% (446 of 1,299 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.67 · 24.4% (317 of 1,299 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.62 · 18.9% (246 of 1,299 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.61 · 22.7% (295 of 1,299 decks)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 0.55 · 17.2% (224 of 1,299 decks)
All instants (4)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.78 · 40.1% (521 of 1,299 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.72 · 23.7% (308 of 1,299 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.69 · 43.8% (569 of 1,299 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.54 · 14.1% (183 of 1,299 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.86 · 49.6% (644 of 1,299 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.77 · 29.2% (379 of 1,299 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.70 · 29.6% (385 of 1,299 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.72 · 27.9% (363 of 1,299 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.65 · 17.9% (233 of 1,299 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.61 · 22.9% (298 of 1,299 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.57 · 17.8% (231 of 1,299 decks)
All lands (5)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.66 · 25.5% (331 of 1,299 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.60 · 47.3% (615 of 1,299 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.54 · 14.3% (186 of 1,299 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.54 · 13.8% (179 of 1,299 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.54 · 30.3% (393 of 1,299 decks)
EDH data for Abundance: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,299 real decks.





















































