Cards like Nature's Rhythm
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Gruul decks
63% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Gruul decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
17× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Gruul decks
63% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Gruul decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Pyroblast
8.1× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Gruul decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Gruul decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Gruul decks
Cards like Icetill Explorer
9.3× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
88% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Gruul decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Gruul decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Mox Diamond
9.3× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Gruul decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Gruul decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Mox Diamond 50%
- Chrome Mox 38%
Cards like Sol Ring
6.0× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 74% of other Gruul decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Gruul decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.84 in other Gruul decks
Cards like Lumra, Bellow of the Woods
Over 20× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Gruul decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Tannuk, Memorial Ensign
5.6× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Gruul decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Gruul decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign 50%
- Koth, the Geomancer 25%
- Sabotender 25%
- Spitfire Lagac 13%
- Tunneling Geopede 13%
Other options: Akoum Hellkite, Cosi's Ravager
Cards like Simian Spirit Guide
4.6× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Gruul decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Gruul decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Crucible of Worlds
8.8× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Gruul decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Gruul decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Gruul decks
Cards
Cards like Exploration
8.2× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Gruul decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Gruul decks
Cards like Springheart Nantuko
7.5× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Gruul decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Gruul decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Springheart Nantuko 25%
- Scute Swarm 25%
Cards like Lotus Petal
4.0× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Gruul decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Gruul decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Lotus Petal 50%
- Lion's Eye Diamond 13%
Cards like Scapeshift
1.5× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Gruul decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Gruul decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.34 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Scapeshift 38%
- Harrow 13%
- Planar Engineering 13%
Other options: Roiling Regrowth, Entish Restoration, Cycle of Renewal
Cards like Elvish Mystic
1.1× as likely as other Gruul decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 36% of other Gruul decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 22% of other Gruul decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.71 in other Gruul decks
Cards
- Elvish Mystic 38%
- Fyndhorn Elves 25%
- Boreal Druid 13%
- Llanowar Elves 13%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Llanowar Tribe, Orochi Sustainer
All top picks (50)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.17 · 87.5% (7 of 8 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.19 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.17 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.19 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.19 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Rydia, Summoner of Mist relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.16 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.15 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.13 · 75.0% (6 of 8 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.17 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.17 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.15 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Tinder Wall relevance 0.14 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.17 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.12 · 75.0% (6 of 8 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.12 · 75.0% (6 of 8 decks)
- Vibrance relevance 0.16 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.13 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.13 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.15 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Pyroblast relevance 0.12 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.14 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Orcish Lumberjack relevance 0.12 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.13 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Six relevance 0.14 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.13 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.12 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.12 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.12 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.13 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Koth, the Geomancer relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.13 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.12 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.12 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.12 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Tiller Engine relevance 0.13 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Red Elemental Blast relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.12 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Simian Spirit Guide relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Hexing Squelcher relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.13 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.11 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.11 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.12 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.11 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.09 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Rite of Flame relevance 0.11 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.17 · 87.5% (7 of 8 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.19 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.17 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 0.19 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Rydia, Summoner of Mist relevance 0.18 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Sowing Mycospawn relevance 0.17 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.15 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Tinder Wall relevance 0.14 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.12 · 75.0% (6 of 8 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.12 · 75.0% (6 of 8 decks)
- Vibrance relevance 0.16 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.13 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Orcish Lumberjack relevance 0.12 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Six relevance 0.14 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.13 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.12 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.12 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Koth, the Geomancer relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.12 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Tiller Engine relevance 0.13 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Simian Spirit Guide relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Hexing Squelcher relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.13 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.11 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.11 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.09 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Nev, the Practical Dean relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.11 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.11 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Nissa, Worldsoul Speaker relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Carnivorous Cultivator // Enroot relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Rosheen, Roaring Prophet relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Capricopian relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Protean Hydra relevance 0.11 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.10 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 0.11 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 0.11 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.10 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Goldhound relevance 0.11 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Vastwood Hydra relevance 0.10 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.09 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.09 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Mistcutter Hydra relevance 0.10 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.09 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.09 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Gargos, Vicious Watcher relevance 0.10 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Dosan the Falling Leaf relevance 0.10 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Hungering Hydra relevance 0.09 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
All artifacts (21)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.15 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.13 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.12 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.11 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.10 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.10 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.10 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.10 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.09 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.09 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Sword of Forge and Frontier relevance 0.09 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.09 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.08 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Defense Grid relevance 0.08 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.07 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.06 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.06 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.06 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.05 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.01 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All enchantments (20)
- Exploration relevance 0.13 · 75.0% (6 of 8 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.12 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.11 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.12 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.11 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Way of the Paradox relevance 0.13 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.09 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.10 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Need for Speed relevance 0.11 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.09 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Undergrowth Recon relevance 0.10 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.09 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Ajani's Anguish relevance 0.09 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.08 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.08 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.07 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.05 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.05 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.04 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.02 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
All instants (31)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.19 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.15 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Pyroblast relevance 0.12 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.14 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Red Elemental Blast relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.10 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.10 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.10 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.08 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Redirect Lightning relevance 0.09 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.07 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.07 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Commune with Lava relevance 0.08 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Final Fortune relevance 0.08 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Klauth's Will relevance 0.07 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.07 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Artifact Mutation relevance 0.07 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.06 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Tibalt's Trickery relevance 0.05 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.05 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.05 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.05 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.04 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Bolt Bend relevance 0.04 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.04 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Untimely Malfunction relevance 0.04 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.04 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.03 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.03 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.02 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.01 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
All sorceries (36)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.16 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.17 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.17 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.13 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.12 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.13 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.12 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Rite of Flame relevance 0.11 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.11 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Wreck and Rebuild relevance 0.10 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.10 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Growth Spasm relevance 0.10 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 0.10 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Traverse the Ulvenwald relevance 0.09 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Zenith Festival relevance 0.09 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.09 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Harvest Season relevance 0.08 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.08 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- New Generation's Technique relevance 0.08 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Gamble relevance 0.07 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.07 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Jaya's Immolating Inferno relevance 0.07 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.07 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.07 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.06 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.06 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Crackle with Power relevance 0.06 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Jeska's Will relevance 0.05 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.05 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.05 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.03 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.02 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.02 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.02 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.02 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.02 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (5)
- Koth of the Hammer relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.10 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.10 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.08 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.08 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.13 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
All utility lands (25)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.17 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Mirrorpool relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.11 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.11 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.11 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.11 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.08 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Winding Canyons relevance 0.12 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.08 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 0.11 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Barbarian Ring relevance 0.10 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.09 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.09 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.08 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.08 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.08 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 0.07 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.06 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.06 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.06 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Arena of Glory relevance 0.05 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.04 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.04 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Sheltered Thicket relevance 0.03 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.03 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
All lands (35)
- Elven Passage relevance 0.19 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 75.0% (6 of 8 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.12 · 75.0% (6 of 8 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.11 · 75.0% (6 of 8 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.13 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.12 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.11 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.11 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Taiga relevance 0.10 · 75.0% (6 of 8 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.12 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.12 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.12 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.10 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.11 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Crumbling Vestige relevance 0.10 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.09 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.09 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.06 · 75.0% (6 of 8 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.07 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Sandstone Needle relevance 0.09 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.09 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.07 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.07 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Thornspire Verge relevance 0.05 · 37.5% (3 of 8 decks)
- Stomping Ground relevance 0.04 · 75.0% (6 of 8 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.04 · 50.0% (4 of 8 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.03 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Cragcrown Pathway // Timbercrown Pathway relevance 0.03 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Copperline Gorge relevance 0.03 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.01 · 62.5% (5 of 8 decks)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.02 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Cinder Glade relevance 0.01 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Mountain relevance 0.01 · 75.0% (6 of 8 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 75.0% (6 of 8 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Dal R'El, Augment Orphan, from 8 real Commander decks.