230+26+4+6+6+4+2+2+
Color Identity Spread
34.3% Green
Commanders
Most Relevant
World Shaper 35.1% of decks
World Shaper 35.1% of decks
Crucible of Worlds 45.9% of decks
Crucible of Worlds 45.9% of decks
Zuran Orb 48.6% of decks
Zuran Orb 48.6% of decks
Scapeshift 45.9% of decks
Scapeshift 45.9% of decks
Constant Mists 37.8% of decks
Constant Mists 37.8% of decks
Icetill Explorer 54.1% of decks
Icetill Explorer 54.1% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Baru, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.55 · 1.3% (1 of 77 decks)
- Michelangelo, Mutant BFF relevance 0.55 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- World Shaper relevance 1.41 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.36 · 45.9% (17 of 37 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.34 · 48.6% (18 of 37 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.29 · 45.9% (17 of 37 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 1.25 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.21 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.21 · 45.9% (17 of 37 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.21 · 48.6% (18 of 37 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.20 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 1.16 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 1.16 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.15 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.10 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 1.10 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.08 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.03 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.03 · 56.8% (21 of 37 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.99 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.98 · 48.6% (18 of 37 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.96 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.95 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.95 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.92 · 45.9% (17 of 37 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.92 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.89 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.88 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.87 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.86 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.84 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.83 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
All creatures (26)
- World Shaper relevance 1.41 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.21 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.21 · 48.6% (18 of 37 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.20 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 1.16 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.15 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.03 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.98 · 48.6% (18 of 37 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.96 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.92 · 45.9% (17 of 37 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.92 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.89 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.88 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.87 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.83 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Six relevance 0.82 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Famished Worldsire relevance 0.80 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.79 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.77 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.72 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.71 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.70 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.69 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.67 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.67 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.65 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.36 · 45.9% (17 of 37 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.34 · 48.6% (18 of 37 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.21 · 45.9% (17 of 37 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 1.10 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 1.16 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.99 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.95 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.84 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.81 · 43.2% (16 of 37 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.64 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
All instants (6)
- Constant Mists relevance 1.25 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.03 · 56.8% (21 of 37 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.86 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.73 · 43.2% (16 of 37 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.69 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.64 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.29 · 45.9% (17 of 37 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.10 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.08 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.63 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.95 · 24.3% (9 of 37 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.69 · 21.6% (8 of 37 decks)
All lands (2)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.79 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.65 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
EDH data for Wood Elemental: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 37 real decks.










































