Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
4.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other green decks
53% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.44 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
87% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
76% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
2.7 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 76%
- Kodama's Reach 62%
- Rampant Growth 56%
- Shared Roots 21%
- New Generation's Technique 20%
- Explosive Vegetation 7%
- Search for Tomorrow 5%
- Migration Path 5%
- Grow from the Ashes 3%
- Beneath the Sands 2%
- Far Wanderings 2%
Other options: Reach the Horizon, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, They Went This Way, Map the Frontier, Terramorph, Deep Reconnaissance, Map the Wastes, Primal Growth, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Roamer's Routine, Path to the Festival
Cards like Bristly Bill, Spine Sower
3.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other green decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.38 in other green decks
Cards
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 40%
- Scythecat Cub 36%
- Mossborn Hydra 33%
- Foe-liage 6%
- Oran-Rief Hydra 2%
- Sazh's Chocobo 2%
Other options: Seedship Agrarian, Floral Evoker, Territorial Scythecat, Undergrowth Champion, Vinelasher Kudzu, Murasa Ranger
Cards like Harrow
2.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other green decks
Cards
- Harrow 44%
- Entish Restoration 42%
- Roiling Regrowth 33%
- Cycle of Renewal 7%
- Planar Engineering 5%
- Scapeshift 3%
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
55% of decks run two or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 58%
- Three Visits 54%
- Skyshroud Claim 39%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 9%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Glimpse the Core, Field Trip, Hunting Wilds
Cards like Branching Evolution
3.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other green decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards like Michelangelo, Mutant BFF
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards like Icetill Explorer
3.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Heroic Intervention
2.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 53% of other green decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
2.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other green decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.53 in other green decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 46%
- Lightning Greaves 34%
Cards like Momentous Fall
5.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other green decks
Cards
- Momentous Fall 22%
- Life's Legacy 17%
Cards like The Earth Crystal
3.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Traverse the Outlands
5.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
- Traverse the Outlands 31%
- Boundless Realms 9%
- Turtle Tracks 6%
- Reshape the Earth 3%
- Nissa's Expedition 2%
- Harvest Season 2%
Other options: New Frontiers, Slimefoot's Survey, Celebrate the Harvest
Cards like Level Up
4.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
- Level Up 41%
- Hydra's Growth 7%
- Seismic Tutelage 3%
Cards like Exploration
3.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Skateboard
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards like Scute Swarm
2.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other green decks
Cards
- Scute Swarm 38%
- Springheart Nantuko 11%
Cards like Explore
2.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards like Rishkar's Expertise
1.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Study the Classics
4.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Crucible of Worlds
2.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Ashaya, Soul of the Wild
6.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Flora Colossus
Cards like Lumra, Bellow of the Woods
6.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Titania, Gaea Incarnate
Cards like Krosan Grip
2.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
- Krosan Grip 25%
- Naturalize 6%
- Wilt 2%
Other options: Oxidize, Natural Reclamation, Stomp and Howl, Relic Crush, Wear Away, Break Asunder, Verdigris
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Elder
2.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Oashra Cultivator, Krosan Wayfarer
Cards like Saved by the Shell
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other green decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Deathrender relevance 0.82 · 56.4% (114 of 202 decks)
- Michelangelo, Improviser relevance 0.55 · 31.7% (64 of 202 decks)
- Study the Classics relevance 0.56 · 26.2% (53 of 202 decks)
- Skateboard relevance 0.58 · 22.8% (46 of 202 decks)
- Saved by the Shell relevance 0.52 · 31.7% (64 of 202 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.48 · 38.6% (78 of 202 decks)
- Michelangelo, Mutant BFF relevance 0.51 · 30.7% (62 of 202 decks)
- High Score relevance 0.46 · 35.6% (72 of 202 decks)
- Michelangelo, Game Master relevance 0.55 · 14.9% (30 of 202 decks)
- Michelangelo's Technique relevance 0.53 · 15.3% (31 of 202 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.40 · 40.6% (82 of 202 decks)
- Cowabunga! relevance 0.55 · 11.4% (23 of 202 decks)
- Super Combo relevance 0.47 · 21.3% (43 of 202 decks)
- Michelangelo, Weirdness to 11 relevance 0.45 · 25.2% (51 of 202 decks)
- New Generation's Technique relevance 0.47 · 20.3% (41 of 202 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.34 · 52.5% (106 of 202 decks)
- Blasting Station relevance 0.48 · 15.8% (32 of 202 decks)
- Manhole Cover relevance 0.55 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.44 · 19.8% (40 of 202 decks)
- Mutant Chain Reaction relevance 0.47 · 13.4% (27 of 202 decks)
- Leatherhead, Iron Gator relevance 0.44 · 17.8% (36 of 202 decks)
- Michelangelo, the Heart relevance 0.45 · 15.8% (32 of 202 decks)
- Novel Nunchaku relevance 0.48 · 11.9% (24 of 202 decks)
- Mikey & Mona, Mutant Sitters relevance 0.52 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.29 · 52.5% (106 of 202 decks)
- Scythecat Cub relevance 0.35 · 36.1% (73 of 202 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.34 · 37.6% (76 of 202 decks)
- Turtle Tracks relevance 0.52 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Mutagen Man, Living Ooze relevance 0.42 · 14.4% (29 of 202 decks)
- Mona Lisa, Science Geek relevance 0.41 · 14.4% (29 of 202 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.40 · 17.3% (35 of 202 decks)
- Foe-liage relevance 0.49 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.27 · 50.0% (101 of 202 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.24 · 60.4% (122 of 202 decks)
- Groundchuck & Dirtbag relevance 0.36 · 20.8% (42 of 202 decks)
- Mona Lisa, Ever Adaptable relevance 0.43 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.30 · 38.6% (78 of 202 decks)
- Coin of Mastery relevance 0.45 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Weather Maker relevance 0.43 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.35 · 20.3% (41 of 202 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.29 · 39.6% (80 of 202 decks)
- Arcade Cabinet relevance 0.42 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Transdimensional Bovine relevance 0.40 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.29 · 32.7% (66 of 202 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.39 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.23 · 55.9% (113 of 202 decks)
- Turtle Van relevance 0.43 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.24 · 48.0% (97 of 202 decks)
- Tenderize relevance 0.38 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.23 · 50.0% (101 of 202 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Michelangelo, Improviser relevance 0.55 · 31.7% (64 of 202 decks)
- Michelangelo, Mutant BFF relevance 0.51 · 30.7% (62 of 202 decks)
- Michelangelo, Game Master relevance 0.55 · 14.9% (30 of 202 decks)
- Michelangelo, Weirdness to 11 relevance 0.45 · 25.2% (51 of 202 decks)
- Leatherhead, Iron Gator relevance 0.44 · 17.8% (36 of 202 decks)
- Michelangelo, the Heart relevance 0.45 · 15.8% (32 of 202 decks)
- Mikey & Mona, Mutant Sitters relevance 0.52 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Scythecat Cub relevance 0.35 · 36.1% (73 of 202 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.34 · 37.6% (76 of 202 decks)
- Mutagen Man, Living Ooze relevance 0.42 · 14.4% (29 of 202 decks)
- Mona Lisa, Science Geek relevance 0.41 · 14.4% (29 of 202 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.40 · 17.3% (35 of 202 decks)
- Foe-liage relevance 0.49 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.24 · 60.4% (122 of 202 decks)
- Groundchuck & Dirtbag relevance 0.36 · 20.8% (42 of 202 decks)
- Mona Lisa, Ever Adaptable relevance 0.43 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.30 · 38.6% (78 of 202 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.29 · 39.6% (80 of 202 decks)
- Transdimensional Bovine relevance 0.40 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.24 · 48.0% (97 of 202 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.24 · 42.6% (86 of 202 decks)
- Leatherhead, Swamp Stalker relevance 0.37 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.29 · 20.3% (41 of 202 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.25 · 32.7% (66 of 202 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.25 · 33.7% (68 of 202 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.26 · 27.7% (56 of 202 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.23 · 37.6% (76 of 202 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.22 · 38.6% (78 of 202 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.26 · 22.8% (46 of 202 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.23 · 32.7% (66 of 202 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.27 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Primordial Pachyderm relevance 0.38 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Zoo Escapees relevance 0.38 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Prehistoric Turtlesaurus relevance 0.40 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.24 · 24.3% (49 of 202 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.25 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Frog Butler relevance 0.29 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider relevance 0.26 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.21 · 31.7% (64 of 202 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.25 · 14.4% (29 of 202 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.23 · 19.8% (40 of 202 decks)
- Runadi, Behemoth Caller relevance 0.29 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.19 · 37.6% (76 of 202 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.26 · 11.4% (23 of 202 decks)
- Protean Hulk relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.21 · 23.3% (47 of 202 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.20 · 26.7% (54 of 202 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.23 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
- Courier of Comestibles relevance 0.33 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Deathrender relevance 0.82 · 56.4% (114 of 202 decks)
- Skateboard relevance 0.58 · 22.8% (46 of 202 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.48 · 38.6% (78 of 202 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.34 · 52.5% (106 of 202 decks)
- Blasting Station relevance 0.48 · 15.8% (32 of 202 decks)
- Manhole Cover relevance 0.55 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.44 · 19.8% (40 of 202 decks)
- Novel Nunchaku relevance 0.48 · 11.9% (24 of 202 decks)
- Coin of Mastery relevance 0.45 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Weather Maker relevance 0.43 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Arcade Cabinet relevance 0.42 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Altar of the Brood relevance 0.39 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.23 · 55.9% (113 of 202 decks)
- Turtle Van relevance 0.43 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.30 · 22.8% (46 of 202 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.36 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Guac & Marshmallow Pizza relevance 0.36 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.29 · 13.4% (27 of 202 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.27 · 16.8% (34 of 202 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.34 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.26 · 19.3% (39 of 202 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.28 · 13.4% (27 of 202 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.29 · 9.9% (20 of 202 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.25 · 15.8% (32 of 202 decks)
- Planar Portal relevance 0.35 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Lavaspur Boots relevance 0.29 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.24 · 14.4% (29 of 202 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.27 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.28 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.23 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
- Cloak of the Bat relevance 0.30 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Fleetfeather Sandals relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.29 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.23 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.24 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.24 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.15 · 45.5% (92 of 202 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.16 · 34.2% (69 of 202 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.15 · 39.1% (79 of 202 decks)
- Ring of Three Wishes relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.16 · 27.7% (56 of 202 decks)
- Doc Ock's Tentacles relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Omni-Cheese Pizza relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.20 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.11 · 46.5% (94 of 202 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- High Score relevance 0.46 · 35.6% (72 of 202 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.40 · 40.6% (82 of 202 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.29 · 52.5% (106 of 202 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.27 · 50.0% (101 of 202 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.23 · 50.0% (101 of 202 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.28 · 28.7% (58 of 202 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.25 · 39.1% (79 of 202 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.31 · 14.4% (29 of 202 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.32 · 11.4% (23 of 202 decks)
- Party Dude relevance 0.36 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.23 · 36.1% (73 of 202 decks)
- Super State relevance 0.32 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.26 · 16.8% (34 of 202 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.23 · 31.7% (64 of 202 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.25 · 14.9% (30 of 202 decks)
- Turtle Power! relevance 0.40 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.26 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Ninja Pizza relevance 0.29 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.26 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.23 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.24 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.22 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.22 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.19 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.21 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Seismic Tutelage relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.16 · 15.8% (32 of 202 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.18 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.20 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Death's Presence relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.15 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.14 · 17.3% (35 of 202 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.17 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.15 · 12.4% (25 of 202 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.16 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.11 · 33.7% (68 of 202 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.14 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.14 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Tale of Katara and Toph relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Crystalline Armor relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
All instants (50)
- Saved by the Shell relevance 0.52 · 31.7% (64 of 202 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.35 · 20.3% (41 of 202 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.29 · 32.7% (66 of 202 decks)
- Tenderize relevance 0.38 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.28 · 21.8% (44 of 202 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.21 · 44.1% (89 of 202 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.22 · 42.1% (85 of 202 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.20 · 24.8% (50 of 202 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.22 · 18.8% (38 of 202 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.21 · 19.3% (39 of 202 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.24 · 9.9% (20 of 202 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.17 · 33.7% (68 of 202 decks)
- Avoid Fate relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.17 · 29.7% (60 of 202 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.20 · 15.3% (31 of 202 decks)
- Turn the Earth relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.19 · 14.4% (29 of 202 decks)
- Once Upon a Time relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.22 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Invigorating Surge relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Solidarity of Heroes relevance 0.25 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.21 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.22 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.17 · 18.3% (37 of 202 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.20 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.18 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.21 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.16 · 17.8% (36 of 202 decks)
- Barrier Breach relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.13 · 38.6% (78 of 202 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.16 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.17 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.10 · 55.9% (113 of 202 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.18 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Blinding Fog relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- You Happen On a Glade relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Pawpatch Formation relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Wilt relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.12 · 13.4% (27 of 202 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.14 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.13 · 9.9% (20 of 202 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.14 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.08 · 47.5% (96 of 202 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Study the Classics relevance 0.56 · 26.2% (53 of 202 decks)
- Michelangelo's Technique relevance 0.53 · 15.3% (31 of 202 decks)
- Cowabunga! relevance 0.55 · 11.4% (23 of 202 decks)
- Super Combo relevance 0.47 · 21.3% (43 of 202 decks)
- New Generation's Technique relevance 0.47 · 20.3% (41 of 202 decks)
- Mutant Chain Reaction relevance 0.47 · 13.4% (27 of 202 decks)
- Turtle Tracks relevance 0.52 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.30 · 19.8% (40 of 202 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.26 · 30.7% (62 of 202 decks)
- Life's Legacy relevance 0.29 · 17.3% (35 of 202 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.26 · 21.3% (43 of 202 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.31 · 9.4% (19 of 202 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.30 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.21 · 39.1% (79 of 202 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.19 · 39.6% (80 of 202 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.27 · 9.9% (20 of 202 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.15 · 62.4% (126 of 202 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.16 · 54.0% (109 of 202 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.25 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Soul's Majesty relevance 0.23 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.13 · 57.9% (117 of 202 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.17 · 32.7% (66 of 202 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.11 · 75.7% (153 of 202 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.22 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.12 · 55.9% (113 of 202 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.22 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.19 · 12.9% (26 of 202 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.21 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.21 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.14 · 35.1% (71 of 202 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.20 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Bygone Marvels relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Nissa's Expedition relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.22 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.20 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.15 · 10.9% (22 of 202 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.14 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (5)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.18 · 13.9% (28 of 202 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.17 · 5.4% (11 of 202 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.19 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
All utility lands (44)
- Turtle Lair relevance 0.56 · 11.9% (24 of 202 decks)
- Hidden Hideout relevance 0.39 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Witch's Clinic relevance 0.29 · 13.9% (28 of 202 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.16 · 48.5% (98 of 202 decks)
- Northampton Farm relevance 0.32 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.24 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 25.2% (51 of 202 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.19 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.15 · 33.2% (67 of 202 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.16 · 27.7% (56 of 202 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.22 · 5.9% (12 of 202 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.13 · 45.5% (92 of 202 decks)
- Miren, the Moaning Well relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.17 · 19.3% (39 of 202 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.21 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.20 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.20 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.15 · 27.2% (55 of 202 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.19 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.14 · 29.2% (59 of 202 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.18 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.15 · 13.4% (27 of 202 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.15 · 7.9% (16 of 202 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.15 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.14 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.13 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.14 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.14 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.11 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
All lands (26)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.21 · 14.4% (29 of 202 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.21 · 14.9% (30 of 202 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.21 · 14.9% (30 of 202 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.21 · 13.9% (28 of 202 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.19 · 16.3% (33 of 202 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.23 · 6.9% (14 of 202 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.18 · 16.8% (34 of 202 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.20 · 8.4% (17 of 202 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.18 · 10.4% (21 of 202 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.15 · 23.3% (47 of 202 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.17 · 13.4% (27 of 202 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.19 · 7.4% (15 of 202 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.19 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.18 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.17 · 6.4% (13 of 202 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.16 · 8.9% (18 of 202 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (7 of 202 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (8 of 202 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (10 of 202 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.15 · 3.0% (6 of 202 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (5 of 202 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 93.6% (189 of 202 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Michelangelo, On the Scene, from 202 real Commander decks.