Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Oath of Teferi relevance 0.38 · 78.6% (22 of 28 decks)
- The Chain Veil relevance 0.39 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.38 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.42 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.40 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigma Sage relevance 0.40 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Vronos, Masked Inquisitor relevance 0.40 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Teferi's Talent relevance 0.39 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Kiora, the Crashing Wave relevance 0.37 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Oath of Gideon relevance 0.37 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Ajani Steadfast relevance 0.35 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.36 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.28 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Bioessence Hydra relevance 0.38 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.33 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.33 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Onakke Oathkeeper relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Gatewatch Beacon relevance 0.35 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Narset Transcendent relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.32 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Elspeth's Talent relevance 0.34 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Oath of Ajani relevance 0.33 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.25 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Urza Assembles the Titans relevance 0.34 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.30 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Sparkshaper Visionary relevance 0.35 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Gideon of the Trials relevance 0.33 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- The Wandering Emperor relevance 0.31 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Ajani, Sleeper Agent relevance 0.29 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.28 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.26 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Teferi, Who Slows the Sunset relevance 0.28 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.31 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Lae'zel, Vlaakith's Champion relevance 0.26 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.25 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.27 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.28 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.29 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Deification relevance 0.29 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Tamiyo, Field Researcher relevance 0.18 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Oath of Nissa relevance 0.29 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.30 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.29 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider relevance 0.24 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.23 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Jace, Architect of Thought relevance 0.29 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Arena Rector relevance 0.29 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Dovin Baan relevance 0.29 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.28 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
Card Stacks
21
Card Stacks
21Showing 1-2 of 21
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Bant decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Scapeshift
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Bant decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Scapeshift 32%
- Harrow 25%
- Roiling Regrowth 18%
- Entish Restoration 14%
- Planar Engineering 11%
- Cycle of Renewal 7%
Cards like Icetill Explorer
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Tatyova, Benthic Druid
17× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Bant decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Crucible of Worlds
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Three Visits
2.0× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Bant decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other Bant decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Three Visits 46%
- Nature's Lore 32%
- Skyshroud Claim 4%
Other options: Ranger's Path, Field Trip, Nissa's Pilgrimage, Hunting Wilds, Glimpse the Core
Cards like Wrenn and Realmbreaker
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Nissa, Who Shakes the World
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Tamiyo, Field Researcher
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Flux Channeler
16× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Bant decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Flux Channeler 39%
- Dreamtide Whale 25%
Cards like Exploration
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.5× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 46% of other Bant decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 22% of other Bant decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.77 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Cultivate 46%
- Kodama's Reach 25%
- Rampant Growth 25%
- Shared Roots 4%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Far Wanderings, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Grow from the Ashes, Search for Tomorrow, Explosive Vegetation, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Roamer's Routine, Migration Path, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Supreme Verdict
5.7× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Bant decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Bant decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Bant decks
Cards
- Supreme Verdict 25%
- Wrath of God 7%
- Day of Judgment 7%
- Doomskar 4%
- Vanquish the Horde 4%
- Rout 4%
Other options: Sunscour, End Hostilities, Sublime Exhalation, Winds of Rath
Cards like Explore
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Bant decks
Cards like Elspeth, Sun's Champion
19× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Bant decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Bant decks
Cards like Sol Ring
2.3× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 79% of other Bant decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Bant decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.84 in other Bant decks
Cards like Bioessence Hydra
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Jace, the Mind Sculptor
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Ajani, the Greathearted
Over 20× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Bant decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Bant decks
Cards
Other options: Ajani, Inspiring Leader, Ajani Goldmane
Cards like Smothering Tithe
3.3× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Bant decks
Cards
Cards like Path to Exile
2.7× as likely as other Bant decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 48% of other Bant decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Bant decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.50 in other Bant decks
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.28 · 57.1% (16 of 28 decks)
- Bioessence Hydra relevance 0.38 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Onakke Oathkeeper relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.25 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Sparkshaper Visionary relevance 0.35 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.28 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.26 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Lae'zel, Vlaakith's Champion relevance 0.26 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider relevance 0.24 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Arena Rector relevance 0.29 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.26 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.19 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.24 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.26 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.25 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.20 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.22 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.25 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.22 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.19 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.20 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.20 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Urza, Lord Protector relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Six relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Seedship Agrarian relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Overlord of the Hauntwoods relevance 0.17 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Archon of Absolution relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Peacekeeper relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Azusa's Many Journeys // Likeness of the Seeker relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.13 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.14 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Spectral Sailor relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Gideon's Company relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Inspired Tethermage relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.11 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Repurposed Enforcer relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.11 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Kiora of Salt and Sand relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Pir, Imaginative Rascal relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All artifacts (50)
- The Chain Veil relevance 0.39 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Ichormoon Gauntlet relevance 0.38 · 60.7% (17 of 28 decks)
- Gatewatch Beacon relevance 0.35 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.28 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.26 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Luxior, Giada's Gift relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.22 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Norn's Annex relevance 0.19 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- The Mightstone and Weakstone relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Contagion Engine relevance 0.18 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Honor-Worn Shaku relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Archaeomancer's Map relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Heart of Kiran relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Urza's Sylex relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Storm Cauldron relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.12 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Gideon's Memorial relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Cloudstone Curio relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.12 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.11 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Mirror Gallery relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Weather Maker relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Glistening Sphere relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Talisman of Progress relevance 0.09 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Obelisk of Bant relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Aetheric Amplifier relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Candelabra of Tawnos relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Chromatic Orrery relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.07 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.07 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.07 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All enchantments (50)
- Oath of Teferi relevance 0.38 · 78.6% (22 of 28 decks)
- Teferi's Talent relevance 0.39 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Oath of Gideon relevance 0.37 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Elspeth's Talent relevance 0.34 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Oath of Ajani relevance 0.33 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Urza Assembles the Titans relevance 0.34 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Deification relevance 0.29 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Oath of Nissa relevance 0.29 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.18 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.21 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Oath of Jace relevance 0.26 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Brokers Ascendancy relevance 0.18 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Way of the Cryomancer relevance 0.23 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Moat relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Glacierwood Siege relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.15 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.15 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Gideon's Resolve relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Case of the Shattered Pact relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Mana Breach relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- On Thin Ice relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Gideon's Intervention relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Dream Tides relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Way of the Healer relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Knighthood relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Trouble in Pairs relevance 0.13 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Sphere of Safety relevance 0.13 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.10 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Vivien's Talent relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Way of the Mentor relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.12 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.10 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Land Tax relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Assemble the Entmoot relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- High Ground relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.10 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Wheel of Sun and Moon relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Sandwurm Convergence relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Amazing Alliance relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Levitation relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.26 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Ignite the Beacon relevance 0.27 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Brokers Confluence relevance 0.22 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.21 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.16 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.17 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.14 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Semester's End relevance 0.17 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.15 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.15 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Gideon's Triumph relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Thwart relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.12 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Jace's Machinations relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.10 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Dovin's Veto relevance 0.10 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.11 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Gideon's Sacrifice relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.10 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Loyal Tutor relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.10 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Erode relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.10 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.08 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.09 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Mercy Killing relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.05 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Settle the Wreckage relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.06 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Final Showdown relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Hindering Light relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.07 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.06 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.07 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All sorceries (50)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.36 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Call the Gatewatch relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Urza's Ruinous Blast relevance 0.20 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.18 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Deploy the Gatewatch relevance 0.21 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.19 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Triumphant Reckoning relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Gideon's Battle Cry relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Sunfall relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Jace's Triumph relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Expansion Algorithm relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.09 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Entrust the Spark relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.13 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.11 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Day of Judgment relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Mentor's Guidance relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Hunting Triad relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.08 · 46.4% (13 of 28 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.11 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.08 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.09 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Rout relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.11 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Carnivorous Canopy relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Promise of Loyalty relevance 0.09 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Expand the Sphere relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.09 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Courage in Crisis relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Plea for Guidance relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Kamahl's Druidic Vow relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.06 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.08 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.09 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
Planeswalkers
50
Planeswalkers
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All planeswalkers (50)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.42 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.40 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigma Sage relevance 0.40 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Vronos, Masked Inquisitor relevance 0.40 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Kiora, the Crashing Wave relevance 0.37 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Ajani Steadfast relevance 0.35 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.33 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.33 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Narset Transcendent relevance 0.34 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Archmage relevance 0.32 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.30 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Gideon of the Trials relevance 0.33 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- The Wandering Emperor relevance 0.31 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Ajani, Sleeper Agent relevance 0.29 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Teferi, Who Slows the Sunset relevance 0.28 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.31 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.25 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.27 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Kasmina, Enigmatic Mentor relevance 0.29 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Tamiyo, Field Researcher relevance 0.18 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.30 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Jace, Unraveler of Secrets relevance 0.29 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.23 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Jace, Architect of Thought relevance 0.29 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Dovin Baan relevance 0.29 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.28 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Tamiyo, Compleated Sage relevance 0.27 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.27 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.27 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Teyo, Geometric Tactician relevance 0.25 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- The Eternal Wanderer relevance 0.24 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Jace, Cunning Castaway relevance 0.26 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Elspeth, Sun's Champion relevance 0.23 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Tamiyo, Collector of Tales relevance 0.24 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Ajani Unyielding relevance 0.23 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Teferi, Hero of Dominaria relevance 0.23 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Ajani, Mentor of Heroes relevance 0.23 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.22 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Huatli, Radiant Champion relevance 0.22 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Grand Master of Flowers relevance 0.24 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- The Wanderer relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Oko, the Ringleader relevance 0.21 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Nissa, Genesis Mage relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Karn, Scion of Urza relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Gideon Jura relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Mu Yanling relevance 0.22 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
Utility Lands
50
Utility Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All utility lands (50)
- Interplanar Beacon relevance 0.31 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.22 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.17 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.18 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.16 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.19 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.17 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.12 · 42.9% (12 of 28 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.13 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.12 · 32.1% (9 of 28 decks)
- Tranquil Landscape relevance 0.12 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.13 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.14 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Spara's Headquarters relevance 0.08 · 53.6% (15 of 28 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.13 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Mobilized District relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.11 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Ghost Town relevance 0.12 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.10 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.10 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Monumental Henge relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Ondu Inversion // Ondu Skyruins relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- University Campus relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.07 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Meditation Pools relevance 0.07 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.07 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.07 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.07 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.05 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Chocobo Camp relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.06 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.05 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.05 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
Lands
50
Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All lands (50)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.15 · 50.0% (14 of 28 decks)
- Transformative Commons relevance 0.23 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Fatehold Annex relevance 0.23 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Vigorbloom Annex relevance 0.23 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.17 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Thawing Glaciers relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.16 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.14 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.14 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.14 · 39.3% (11 of 28 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.10 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.15 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.15 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.09 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.14 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.15 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.16 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.15 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.09 · 64.3% (18 of 28 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.14 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.13 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.12 · 25.0% (7 of 28 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.11 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.12 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Bant Panorama relevance 0.13 · 10.7% (3 of 28 decks)
- Bad River relevance 0.14 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Hallowed Fountain relevance 0.07 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.07 · 71.4% (20 of 28 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.11 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.07 · 67.9% (19 of 28 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.09 · 35.7% (10 of 28 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.10 · 14.3% (4 of 28 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Sea of Clouds relevance 0.08 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Hobbit Hole relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.08 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.08 · 21.4% (6 of 28 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.11 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Deserted Beach relevance 0.08 · 17.9% (5 of 28 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.07 · 28.6% (8 of 28 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.10 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.09 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Grasslands relevance 0.08 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Urban Retreat relevance 0.08 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Svega, the Unconventional, from 28 real Commander decks.