Cards like Growth Spiral
4.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other Simic decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.53 in other Simic decks
Cards like Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
5.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Tatyova, Benthic Druid
3.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other Simic decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Gandalf, Shadow's Foe
Cards like Scute Swarm
4.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Scute Swarm 49%
- Springheart Nantuko 14%
Cards like Expedition Map
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.82 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Expedition Map 72%
- World Map 10%
Other options: Wayfarer's Bauble, Moonsilver Key, Armillary Sphere, Traveler's Amulet, Keys to the House, Braidwood Sextant, Ominous Parcel, Renegade Map, Wanderer's Twig
Cards like Ulvenwald Hydra
10× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Circuitous Route
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Ramunap Excavator
2.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Pongify
1.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.87 per deck on average
vs. 0.49 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Pongify 65%
- Rapid Hybridization 22%
Cards like Urban Evolution
2.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Oracle of Mul Daya
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Crop Rotation
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Crop Rotation 52%
- Reap and Sow 5%
Cards like Elvish Rejuvenator
15× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Contagious Vorrac, Overgrown Pest
Cards like Harmonize
4.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Harmonize 19%
- Treasure Cruise 8%
- Eagle Vision 1%
Other options: Tidings, Unexplained Vision, Concentrate, Universal Surveillance, Vivisurgeon's Insight, Brilliant Plan, Shared Discovery, Reverse Engineer
Cards like Finale of Revelation
19× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Master of the Pearl Trident
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards like Eternal Witness
1.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Elvish Regrower, Deadwood Treefolk, Wildwood Escort
All top picks (50)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.24 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Thrumming Hivepool relevance 0.24 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 0.24 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 0.24 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Herald of Hoofbeats relevance 0.25 · 18.1% (15 of 83 decks)
- Galerider Sliver relevance 0.25 · 18.1% (15 of 83 decks)
- Sunderflock relevance 0.23 · 24.1% (20 of 83 decks)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 0.23 · 24.1% (20 of 83 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 0.25 · 16.9% (14 of 83 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.23 · 25.3% (21 of 83 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 0.23 · 25.3% (21 of 83 decks)
- Multiclass Baldric relevance 0.23 · 25.3% (21 of 83 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.23 · 26.5% (22 of 83 decks)
- Feline Sovereign relevance 0.25 · 15.7% (13 of 83 decks)
- Xolatoyac, the Smiling Flood relevance 0.22 · 28.9% (24 of 83 decks)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.26 · 14.5% (12 of 83 decks)
- Rampant Frogantua relevance 0.26 · 14.5% (12 of 83 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.26 · 14.5% (12 of 83 decks)
- Master of the Pearl Trident relevance 0.21 · 31.3% (26 of 83 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.21 · 31.3% (26 of 83 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.21 · 32.5% (27 of 83 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.20 · 34.9% (29 of 83 decks)
- Descendants' Path relevance 0.26 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Shifting Sliver relevance 0.26 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.26 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Diffusion Sliver relevance 0.26 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.23 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 0.23 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.24 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Oko, Lorwyn Liege // Oko, Shadowmoor Scion relevance 0.24 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.24 · 19.3% (16 of 83 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.24 · 19.3% (16 of 83 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.24 · 18.1% (15 of 83 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.24 · 18.1% (15 of 83 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.24 · 18.1% (15 of 83 decks)
- Aven Courier relevance 0.20 · 36.1% (30 of 83 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.24 · 16.9% (14 of 83 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.24 · 15.7% (13 of 83 decks)
- Wonderscape Sage relevance 0.21 · 31.3% (26 of 83 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.21 · 31.3% (26 of 83 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.25 · 14.5% (12 of 83 decks)
- Collective Restraint relevance 0.26 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Harabaz Druid relevance 0.26 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.26 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 0.26 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Lord of Atlantis relevance 0.26 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Pheres-Band Warchief relevance 0.26 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.23 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.22 · 25.3% (21 of 83 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 0.23 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 0.24 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 0.24 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Galerider Sliver relevance 0.25 · 18.1% (15 of 83 decks)
- Herald of Hoofbeats relevance 0.25 · 18.1% (15 of 83 decks)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 0.23 · 24.1% (20 of 83 decks)
- Sunderflock relevance 0.23 · 24.1% (20 of 83 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 0.25 · 16.9% (14 of 83 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 0.23 · 26.5% (22 of 83 decks)
- Feline Sovereign relevance 0.25 · 15.7% (13 of 83 decks)
- Xolatoyac, the Smiling Flood relevance 0.22 · 28.9% (24 of 83 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.26 · 14.5% (12 of 83 decks)
- Rampant Frogantua relevance 0.26 · 14.5% (12 of 83 decks)
- Master of the Pearl Trident relevance 0.21 · 31.3% (26 of 83 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.21 · 32.5% (27 of 83 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.20 · 34.9% (29 of 83 decks)
- Shifting Sliver relevance 0.26 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Diffusion Sliver relevance 0.26 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Hydra Broodmaster relevance 0.23 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.24 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.24 · 19.3% (16 of 83 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.24 · 18.1% (15 of 83 decks)
- Aven Courier relevance 0.20 · 36.1% (30 of 83 decks)
- Elvish Rejuvenator relevance 0.24 · 15.7% (13 of 83 decks)
- Wonderscape Sage relevance 0.21 · 31.3% (26 of 83 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.25 · 14.5% (12 of 83 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 0.26 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Lord of Atlantis relevance 0.26 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Harabaz Druid relevance 0.26 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Pheres-Band Warchief relevance 0.26 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 0.23 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Scion of Draco relevance 0.25 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.25 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Hakbal of the Surging Soul relevance 0.17 · 45.8% (38 of 83 decks)
- Sea Gate Loremaster relevance 0.26 · 10.8% (9 of 83 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.19 · 34.9% (29 of 83 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.24 · 14.5% (12 of 83 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.22 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Mutable Explorer relevance 0.25 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.18 · 41.0% (34 of 83 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.18 · 42.2% (35 of 83 decks)
- Titan of Littjara relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (8 of 83 decks)
- PuPu UFO relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (8 of 83 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.20 · 30.1% (25 of 83 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 0.24 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.25 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Grolnok, the Omnivore relevance 0.25 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Goldberry, River-Daughter relevance 0.25 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.25 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Tendershoot Dryad relevance 0.25 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Vodalian Hexcatcher relevance 0.25 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.24 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Thrumming Hivepool relevance 0.24 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Multiclass Baldric relevance 0.23 · 25.3% (21 of 83 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.23 · 25.3% (21 of 83 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.25 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Manascape Refractor relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (8 of 83 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.24 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Mirage Mirror relevance 0.16 · 47.0% (39 of 83 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.25 · 9.6% (8 of 83 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.21 · 16.9% (14 of 83 decks)
- Oblivion Stone relevance 0.24 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.22 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Robe of the Archmagi relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Mox Jasper relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- World Map relevance 0.22 · 9.6% (8 of 83 decks)
- The Endstone relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Monument to Perfection relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.22 · 7.2% (6 of 83 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.13 · 44.6% (37 of 83 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.21 · 7.2% (6 of 83 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Prismatic Geoscope relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- All-Fates Scroll relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.09 · 72.3% (60 of 83 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Gathering Stone relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Wizard's Staff relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
All enchantments (48)
- Desert Warfare relevance 0.23 · 25.3% (21 of 83 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.21 · 31.3% (26 of 83 decks)
- Descendants' Path relevance 0.26 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Collective Restraint relevance 0.26 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.25 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.17 · 41.0% (34 of 83 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.23 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.16 · 49.4% (41 of 83 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.25 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.25 · 9.6% (8 of 83 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.24 · 10.8% (9 of 83 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.21 · 16.9% (14 of 83 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.23 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Full Moon's Rise relevance 0.25 · 7.2% (6 of 83 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.24 · 9.6% (8 of 83 decks)
- Omenpath Journey relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Deeproot Pilgrimage relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.12 · 63.9% (53 of 83 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- From Beyond relevance 0.18 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Leyline of Transformation relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Utter Insignificance relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Guild Summit relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Diplomatic Immunity relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Way of the Thief relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Treachery relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Arcane Adaptation relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Impostor Syndrome relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Unquenchable Thirst relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Echoes of Eternity relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.14 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
All instants (50)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.26 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.23 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.21 · 31.3% (26 of 83 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.26 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.23 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.23 · 19.3% (16 of 83 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.25 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.24 · 15.7% (13 of 83 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.21 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.21 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.25 · 10.8% (9 of 83 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.17 · 41.0% (34 of 83 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.22 · 14.5% (12 of 83 decks)
- Summary Dismissal relevance 0.25 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.25 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 0.15 · 54.2% (45 of 83 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.24 · 10.8% (9 of 83 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.25 · 7.2% (6 of 83 decks)
- Evasive Action relevance 0.25 · 7.2% (6 of 83 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.21 · 15.7% (13 of 83 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.15 · 45.8% (38 of 83 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.23 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.24 · 7.2% (6 of 83 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 0.24 · 7.2% (6 of 83 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Absorb Identity relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.16 · 36.1% (30 of 83 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.22 · 9.6% (8 of 83 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.13 · 51.8% (43 of 83 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.21 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Memory Deluge relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Dazzling Denial relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.11 · 65.1% (54 of 83 decks)
- Null Elemental Blast relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.10 · 66.3% (55 of 83 decks)
- Kozilek's Command relevance 0.20 · 7.2% (6 of 83 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.11 · 62.7% (52 of 83 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Elemental Teachings relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Harmonize relevance 0.24 · 19.3% (16 of 83 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.24 · 18.1% (15 of 83 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.24 · 18.1% (15 of 83 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.24 · 16.9% (14 of 83 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.22 · 25.3% (21 of 83 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.23 · 19.3% (16 of 83 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.23 · 18.1% (15 of 83 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.18 · 44.6% (37 of 83 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 0.17 · 45.8% (38 of 83 decks)
- March from Velis Vel relevance 0.19 · 37.3% (31 of 83 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.25 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Mind into Matter relevance 0.25 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.18 · 38.6% (32 of 83 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.20 · 31.3% (26 of 83 decks)
- Lessons from Life relevance 0.26 · 9.6% (8 of 83 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.25 · 10.8% (9 of 83 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.22 · 14.5% (12 of 83 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.16 · 49.4% (41 of 83 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 0.25 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.25 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Pir's Whim relevance 0.25 · 9.6% (8 of 83 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.22 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.25 · 7.2% (6 of 83 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.24 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.24 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.24 · 9.6% (8 of 83 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.22 · 10.8% (9 of 83 decks)
- Celestial Reunion relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Travel the Overworld relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Peer Pressure relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.18 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.23 · 7.2% (6 of 83 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Reap and Sow relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Through the Forest Gate relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Green Sun's Twilight relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Rise of the Eldrazi relevance 0.21 · 7.2% (6 of 83 decks)
- Disorienting Choice relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.21 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.09 · 73.5% (61 of 83 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.09 · 72.3% (60 of 83 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Bring to Light relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.08 · 78.3% (65 of 83 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.19 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (11)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.26 · 14.5% (12 of 83 decks)
- Oko, Lorwyn Liege // Oko, Shadowmoor Scion relevance 0.24 · 20.5% (17 of 83 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.26 · 10.8% (9 of 83 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.23 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.21 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Ugin, the Spirit Dragon relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.17 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Ugin, the Ineffable relevance 0.15 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Volatile Fault relevance 0.24 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 0.25 · 19.3% (16 of 83 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.25 · 18.1% (15 of 83 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.23 · 24.1% (20 of 83 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.23 · 25.3% (21 of 83 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.23 · 26.5% (22 of 83 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.22 · 27.7% (23 of 83 decks)
- Swarmyard relevance 0.21 · 31.3% (26 of 83 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.20 · 34.9% (29 of 83 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.20 · 34.9% (29 of 83 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.26 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.23 · 24.1% (20 of 83 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.24 · 19.3% (16 of 83 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.24 · 18.1% (15 of 83 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 0.22 · 27.7% (23 of 83 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.21 · 28.9% (24 of 83 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.22 · 24.1% (20 of 83 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.23 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.18 · 41.0% (34 of 83 decks)
- Balamb Garden, SeeD Academy // Balamb Garden, Airborne relevance 0.26 · 10.8% (9 of 83 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.18 · 42.2% (35 of 83 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.23 · 15.7% (13 of 83 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.23 · 14.5% (12 of 83 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.25 · 10.8% (9 of 83 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.23 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.21 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.25 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Accursed Duneyard relevance 0.25 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.17 · 39.8% (33 of 83 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.23 · 12.0% (10 of 83 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.21 · 19.3% (16 of 83 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.18 · 33.7% (28 of 83 decks)
- Griffin Canyon relevance 0.25 · 7.2% (6 of 83 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.24 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.24 · 9.6% (8 of 83 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.24 · 9.6% (8 of 83 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.13 · 61.4% (51 of 83 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.20 · 16.9% (14 of 83 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.19 · 22.9% (19 of 83 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.21 · 13.3% (11 of 83 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 0.12 · 65.1% (54 of 83 decks)
- Trenchpost relevance 0.13 · 59.0% (49 of 83 decks)
- Drowner of Truth // Drowned Jungle relevance 0.24 · 7.2% (6 of 83 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.23 · 7.2% (6 of 83 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Trenzalore Clocktower relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
All lands (50)
- Sunken Citadel relevance 0.26 · 14.5% (12 of 83 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.24 · 18.1% (15 of 83 decks)
- Thran Portal relevance 0.24 · 15.7% (13 of 83 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.20 · 33.7% (28 of 83 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 0.20 · 33.7% (28 of 83 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 0.19 · 38.6% (32 of 83 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.24 · 15.7% (13 of 83 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.24 · 14.5% (12 of 83 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.21 · 25.3% (21 of 83 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.23 · 14.5% (12 of 83 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.15 · 51.8% (43 of 83 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.13 · 61.4% (51 of 83 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.19 · 21.7% (18 of 83 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.22 · 10.8% (9 of 83 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.23 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.20 · 14.5% (12 of 83 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.24 · 7.2% (6 of 83 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 0.11 · 68.7% (57 of 83 decks)
- Urza's Workshop relevance 0.21 · 10.8% (9 of 83 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.16 · 33.7% (28 of 83 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.23 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.16 · 27.7% (23 of 83 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.22 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.22 · 6.0% (5 of 83 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.12 · 51.8% (43 of 83 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.09 · 75.9% (63 of 83 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.20 · 8.4% (7 of 83 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.13 · 42.2% (35 of 83 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.19 · 7.2% (6 of 83 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.20 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.09 · 69.9% (58 of 83 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.09 · 68.7% (57 of 83 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.18 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Eldrazi Temple relevance 0.18 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.19 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.17 · 4.8% (4 of 83 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.17 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.07 · 74.7% (62 of 83 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.07 · 74.7% (62 of 83 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.16 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Guadosalam, Farplane Gateway relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Snow-Covered Wastes relevance 0.19 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.05 · 90.4% (75 of 83 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.05 · 84.3% (70 of 83 decks)
- Cloudpost relevance 0.05 · 96.4% (80 of 83 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Omo, Queen of Vesuva, from 83 real Commander decks.