Cards like Tatyova, Steward of Tides
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
56% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Growth Spiral
3.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other Simic decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Growth Spiral 63%
- Eureka Moment 34%
- Joint Exploration 23%
Cards like Tatyova, Benthic Druid
3.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Cultivate
1.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 56% of other Simic decks
59% of decks run two or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
1.9 per deck on average
vs. 1.2 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Cultivate 61%
- Rampant Growth 50%
- Kodama's Reach 47%
- Shared Roots 13%
- Search for Tomorrow 9%
- Explosive Vegetation 4%
- Migration Path 3%
- Grow from the Ashes 2%
Other options: Far Wanderings, Viewpoint Synchronization, Map the Wastes, Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Roamer's Routine, Terramorph, Peregrination, Primal Growth, They Went This Way, Verdant Mastery, Path to the Festival, Untamed Wilds, New Generation's Technique, Beneath the Sands, Deep Reconnaissance
Cards like Sylvan Advocate
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Sylvan Advocate 57%
- Earth Surge 24%
Cards like Earthbending Student
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Llanowar Loamspeaker
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
3.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Simic decks
Cards like Entish Restoration
3.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Simic decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Thought Vessel
7.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Nissa, Who Shakes the World
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Bumi, Eclectic Earthbender
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Nissa, Vital Force
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Ramunap Excavator
2.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Bident of Thassa
5.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Mischievous Catgeist // Catlike Curiosity
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
5.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy
16× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Wizard Class
4.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Exploration
4.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Devastation Tide
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Counterspell
1.2× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 40%
- Negate 32%
- Essence Scatter 2%
- Wash Away 2%
Other options: Wild Unraveling, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Intervene, Spell Snare, Nullify, Minor Misstep, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Stern Scolding, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Outwit
Cards like Urban Evolution
2.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Explore
2.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Simic decks
Cards like Wind Zendikon
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards like Heroic Intervention
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Traverse the Outlands
3.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Celebrate the Harvest, Nissa's Expedition, Slimefoot's Survey, New Frontiers, Turtle Tracks
Cards like Unwind
2.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other Simic decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other Simic decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.71 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 39%
- Three Visits 27%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 12%
- Skyshroud Claim 8%
- Hunting Wilds 2%
- Glimpse the Core 2%
- Ranger's Path 1%
Other options: Field Trip
Cards like The Legend of Kyoshi // Avatar Kyoshi
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
All top picks (50)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 0.70 · 73.1% (674 of 922 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.81 · 57.3% (528 of 922 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.78 · 60.3% (556 of 922 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.79 · 53.6% (494 of 922 decks)
- Awakening of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 0.84 · 45.7% (421 of 922 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 0.72 · 56.9% (525 of 922 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.72 · 56.3% (519 of 922 decks)
- Halimar Tidecaller relevance 0.86 · 38.6% (356 of 922 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 0.71 · 50.9% (469 of 922 decks)
- Wind Zendikon relevance 0.89 · 20.5% (189 of 922 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 0.89 · 19.3% (178 of 922 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.71 · 36.7% (338 of 922 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.74 · 31.9% (294 of 922 decks)
- Earth Surge relevance 0.80 · 23.5% (217 of 922 decks)
- Scatter to the Winds relevance 0.83 · 19.3% (178 of 922 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.61 · 48.9% (451 of 922 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 0.78 · 25.3% (233 of 922 decks)
- The Legend of Kyoshi // Avatar Kyoshi relevance 0.70 · 35.1% (324 of 922 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.66 · 40.2% (371 of 922 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.75 · 28.9% (266 of 922 decks)
- Waker of the Wilds relevance 0.82 · 19.8% (183 of 922 decks)
- Earthbending Student relevance 0.79 · 21.6% (199 of 922 decks)
- Avatar Kyoshi, Earthbender relevance 0.75 · 26.2% (242 of 922 decks)
- Emergent Sequence relevance 0.70 · 32.9% (303 of 922 decks)
- Teferi's Response relevance 0.89 · 11.6% (107 of 922 decks)
- Bumi, Eclectic Earthbender relevance 0.77 · 20.3% (187 of 922 decks)
- Skyshroud Blessing relevance 0.87 · 12.1% (112 of 922 decks)
- Rockalanche relevance 0.74 · 21.6% (199 of 922 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.63 · 35.5% (327 of 922 decks)
- Toph, the Blind Bandit relevance 0.74 · 18.3% (169 of 922 decks)
- Cracked Earth Technique relevance 0.75 · 16.4% (151 of 922 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.68 · 25.8% (238 of 922 decks)
- The Boulder, Ready to Rumble relevance 0.73 · 15.7% (145 of 922 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.70 · 18.3% (169 of 922 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.66 · 23.1% (213 of 922 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.62 · 29.6% (273 of 922 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.55 · 40.1% (370 of 922 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.69 · 15.9% (147 of 922 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.65 · 20.2% (186 of 922 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.67 · 16.1% (148 of 922 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.72 · 11.6% (107 of 922 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.63 · 19.3% (178 of 922 decks)
- Filter Out relevance 0.60 · 20.0% (184 of 922 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.68 · 11.9% (110 of 922 decks)
- Earth Rumble relevance 0.71 · 9.8% (90 of 922 decks)
- Solid Ground relevance 0.68 · 11.5% (106 of 922 decks)
- Roaring Earth relevance 0.61 · 16.8% (155 of 922 decks)
- Earthbending Lesson relevance 0.69 · 10.4% (96 of 922 decks)
- Badgermole relevance 0.64 · 12.5% (115 of 922 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.69 · 9.2% (85 of 922 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 0.70 · 73.1% (674 of 922 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.81 · 57.3% (528 of 922 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.78 · 60.3% (556 of 922 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 0.72 · 56.9% (525 of 922 decks)
- Halimar Tidecaller relevance 0.86 · 38.6% (356 of 922 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 0.71 · 50.9% (469 of 922 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 0.89 · 19.3% (178 of 922 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.71 · 36.7% (338 of 922 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.74 · 31.9% (294 of 922 decks)
- Liege of the Tangle relevance 0.78 · 25.3% (233 of 922 decks)
- The Legend of Kyoshi // Avatar Kyoshi relevance 0.70 · 35.1% (324 of 922 decks)
- Waker of the Wilds relevance 0.82 · 19.8% (183 of 922 decks)
- Earthbending Student relevance 0.79 · 21.6% (199 of 922 decks)
- Avatar Kyoshi, Earthbender relevance 0.75 · 26.2% (242 of 922 decks)
- Bumi, Eclectic Earthbender relevance 0.77 · 20.3% (187 of 922 decks)
- Toph, the Blind Bandit relevance 0.74 · 18.3% (169 of 922 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.68 · 25.8% (238 of 922 decks)
- The Boulder, Ready to Rumble relevance 0.73 · 15.7% (145 of 922 decks)
- Badgermole relevance 0.64 · 12.5% (115 of 922 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.69 · 9.2% (85 of 922 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.49 · 32.4% (299 of 922 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.48 · 31.5% (290 of 922 decks)
- Jolrael, Mwonvuli Recluse relevance 0.56 · 16.2% (149 of 922 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.42 · 42.8% (395 of 922 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 0.48 · 30.4% (280 of 922 decks)
- Awakener Druid relevance 0.75 · 4.4% (41 of 922 decks)
- Earth Kingdom General relevance 0.64 · 7.8% (72 of 922 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.56 · 11.7% (108 of 922 decks)
- Keeper of Fables relevance 0.62 · 7.3% (67 of 922 decks)
- Body of Knowledge relevance 0.51 · 15.0% (138 of 922 decks)
- Vnwxt, Verbose Host relevance 0.58 · 7.4% (68 of 922 decks)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 0.44 · 19.7% (182 of 922 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.50 · 9.8% (90 of 922 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 0.41 · 21.4% (197 of 922 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.54 · 5.3% (49 of 922 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.23 · 72.0% (664 of 922 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 0.63 · 3.8% (35 of 922 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.50 · 7.3% (67 of 922 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.37 · 25.1% (231 of 922 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.37 · 23.1% (213 of 922 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.34 · 32.2% (297 of 922 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.45 · 10.0% (92 of 922 decks)
- Skullwinder relevance 0.48 · 6.8% (63 of 922 decks)
- Gretchen Titchwillow relevance 0.47 · 6.7% (62 of 922 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 0.56 · 4.1% (38 of 922 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.39 · 13.6% (125 of 922 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.30 · 38.9% (359 of 922 decks)
- Enduring Curiosity relevance 0.44 · 8.9% (82 of 922 decks)
- The Earth King relevance 0.49 · 4.7% (43 of 922 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.32 · 30.3% (279 of 922 decks)
All artifacts (24)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.67 · 16.1% (148 of 922 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.56 · 8.5% (78 of 922 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.45 · 21.0% (194 of 922 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.51 · 11.3% (104 of 922 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.45 · 14.6% (135 of 922 decks)
- Bident of Thassa relevance 0.39 · 16.9% (156 of 922 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.50 · 4.7% (43 of 922 decks)
- Darksteel Garrison relevance 0.68 · 2.7% (25 of 922 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.41 · 10.2% (94 of 922 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.28 · 40.7% (375 of 922 decks)
- Venser's Journal relevance 0.51 · 3.9% (36 of 922 decks)
- Library of Leng relevance 0.53 · 2.7% (25 of 922 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.38 · 4.4% (41 of 922 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.41 · 3.9% (36 of 922 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.37 · 3.1% (29 of 922 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (34 of 922 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.19 · 8.6% (79 of 922 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.18 · 8.5% (78 of 922 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (23 of 922 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.17 · 8.2% (76 of 922 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.16 · 8.0% (74 of 922 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (23 of 922 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.07 · 31.1% (287 of 922 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 59.9% (552 of 922 decks)
All enchantments (45)
- Wind Zendikon relevance 0.89 · 20.5% (189 of 922 decks)
- Earth Surge relevance 0.80 · 23.5% (217 of 922 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.63 · 35.5% (327 of 922 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.55 · 40.1% (370 of 922 decks)
- Solid Ground relevance 0.68 · 11.5% (106 of 922 decks)
- Roaring Earth relevance 0.61 · 16.8% (155 of 922 decks)
- Harmonious Emergence relevance 0.73 · 6.1% (56 of 922 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.47 · 37.1% (342 of 922 decks)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 0.68 · 4.8% (44 of 922 decks)
- Nature's Will relevance 0.56 · 9.9% (91 of 922 decks)
- Genju of the Falls relevance 0.75 · 3.9% (36 of 922 decks)
- Ior Ruin Expedition relevance 0.57 · 6.8% (63 of 922 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.38 · 34.7% (320 of 922 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.42 · 17.9% (165 of 922 decks)
- Nissa's Zendikon relevance 0.67 · 3.6% (33 of 922 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.45 · 11.7% (108 of 922 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.46 · 10.7% (99 of 922 decks)
- On the Trail relevance 0.50 · 5.6% (52 of 922 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.42 · 11.2% (103 of 922 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.47 · 6.4% (59 of 922 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.44 · 8.9% (82 of 922 decks)
- Glacierwood Siege relevance 0.45 · 6.6% (61 of 922 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.43 · 8.0% (74 of 922 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.42 · 8.1% (75 of 922 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.31 · 22.1% (204 of 922 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.41 · 5.2% (48 of 922 decks)
- Coastal Piracy relevance 0.43 · 4.0% (37 of 922 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.36 · 6.4% (59 of 922 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.37 · 4.9% (45 of 922 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.39 · 4.4% (41 of 922 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.43 · 3.5% (32 of 922 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.31 · 8.6% (79 of 922 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.40 · 3.9% (36 of 922 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.38 · 3.6% (33 of 922 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.34 · 3.9% (36 of 922 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.28 · 6.3% (58 of 922 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.37 · 3.3% (30 of 922 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.26 · 5.9% (54 of 922 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (40 of 922 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 0.33 · 2.8% (26 of 922 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.22 · 7.2% (66 of 922 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (26 of 922 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.20 · 8.9% (82 of 922 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.19 · 6.0% (55 of 922 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.23 · 3.4% (31 of 922 decks)
All instants (50)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.79 · 53.6% (494 of 922 decks)
- Awakening of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 0.84 · 45.7% (421 of 922 decks)
- Scatter to the Winds relevance 0.83 · 19.3% (178 of 922 decks)
- Teferi's Response relevance 0.89 · 11.6% (107 of 922 decks)
- Skyshroud Blessing relevance 0.87 · 12.1% (112 of 922 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.66 · 23.1% (213 of 922 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.65 · 20.2% (186 of 922 decks)
- Filter Out relevance 0.60 · 20.0% (184 of 922 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.68 · 11.9% (110 of 922 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.53 · 15.9% (147 of 922 decks)
- Joint Exploration relevance 0.47 · 23.4% (216 of 922 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.38 · 29.7% (274 of 922 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.35 · 30.4% (280 of 922 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.39 · 15.1% (139 of 922 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.32 · 34.4% (317 of 922 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.33 · 25.3% (233 of 922 decks)
- Rampaging Growth relevance 0.60 · 2.9% (27 of 922 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.43 · 5.3% (49 of 922 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.33 · 17.7% (163 of 922 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.33 · 16.1% (148 of 922 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.38 · 8.5% (78 of 922 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.30 · 20.1% (185 of 922 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.42 · 4.7% (43 of 922 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.38 · 7.5% (69 of 922 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.40 · 4.8% (44 of 922 decks)
- Voidslime relevance 0.37 · 7.7% (71 of 922 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.37 · 6.6% (61 of 922 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.38 · 4.9% (45 of 922 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.35 · 8.6% (79 of 922 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.42 · 4.0% (37 of 922 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.35 · 6.4% (59 of 922 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.36 · 5.5% (51 of 922 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.28 · 15.9% (147 of 922 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.35 · 5.9% (54 of 922 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.42 · 3.9% (36 of 922 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.23 · 31.9% (294 of 922 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 0.34 · 5.2% (48 of 922 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.39 · 3.9% (36 of 922 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.46 · 2.7% (25 of 922 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.23 · 23.3% (215 of 922 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.30 · 8.4% (77 of 922 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.15 · 63.1% (582 of 922 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.33 · 4.7% (43 of 922 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.29 · 7.6% (70 of 922 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.44 · 2.7% (25 of 922 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.26 · 11.5% (106 of 922 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.27 · 6.6% (61 of 922 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.20 · 19.1% (176 of 922 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.32 · 3.8% (35 of 922 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.35 · 3.1% (29 of 922 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.72 · 56.3% (519 of 922 decks)
- Consuming Tide relevance 0.66 · 40.2% (371 of 922 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.75 · 28.9% (266 of 922 decks)
- Emergent Sequence relevance 0.70 · 32.9% (303 of 922 decks)
- Rockalanche relevance 0.74 · 21.6% (199 of 922 decks)
- Cracked Earth Technique relevance 0.75 · 16.4% (151 of 922 decks)
- Flood of Tears relevance 0.62 · 29.6% (273 of 922 decks)
- Earth Rumble relevance 0.71 · 9.8% (90 of 922 decks)
- Earthbending Lesson relevance 0.69 · 10.4% (96 of 922 decks)
- Displacement Wave relevance 0.64 · 10.5% (97 of 922 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.49 · 27.0% (249 of 922 decks)
- Crush of Tentacles relevance 0.60 · 11.0% (101 of 922 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.46 · 30.5% (281 of 922 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.51 · 19.1% (176 of 922 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.49 · 20.6% (190 of 922 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.55 · 12.5% (115 of 922 decks)
- Coastal Discovery relevance 0.69 · 4.6% (42 of 922 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.49 · 16.9% (156 of 922 decks)
- Coastal Breach relevance 0.59 · 6.1% (56 of 922 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.56 · 7.8% (72 of 922 decks)
- Clutch of Currents relevance 0.66 · 4.2% (39 of 922 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.37 · 25.9% (239 of 922 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.27 · 42.7% (394 of 922 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.41 · 8.7% (80 of 922 decks)
- Bumi's Feast Lecture relevance 0.58 · 3.0% (28 of 922 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.36 · 12.6% (116 of 922 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.42 · 5.6% (52 of 922 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.37 · 10.6% (98 of 922 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.40 · 6.5% (60 of 922 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.34 · 12.1% (112 of 922 decks)
- Lessons from Life relevance 0.36 · 7.8% (72 of 922 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.40 · 4.7% (43 of 922 decks)
- Cosmium Confluence relevance 0.55 · 2.6% (24 of 922 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.31 · 13.9% (128 of 922 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.45 · 3.9% (36 of 922 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.37 · 6.2% (57 of 922 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.37 · 5.5% (51 of 922 decks)
- Finale of Revelation relevance 0.32 · 10.5% (97 of 922 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.20 · 46.7% (431 of 922 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.34 · 6.5% (60 of 922 decks)
- Soul's Majesty relevance 0.47 · 3.0% (28 of 922 decks)
- Life's Legacy relevance 0.46 · 3.0% (28 of 922 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.30 · 9.0% (83 of 922 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.18 · 49.6% (457 of 922 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.32 · 5.2% (48 of 922 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.16 · 61.1% (563 of 922 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.38 · 3.8% (35 of 922 decks)
- Will of the Sultai relevance 0.45 · 2.5% (23 of 922 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.28 · 7.9% (73 of 922 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.20 · 24.9% (230 of 922 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (7)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.61 · 48.9% (451 of 922 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.70 · 18.3% (169 of 922 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.69 · 15.9% (147 of 922 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.72 · 11.6% (107 of 922 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.45 · 6.2% (57 of 922 decks)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.40 · 9.1% (84 of 922 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.52 · 3.5% (32 of 922 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.63 · 19.3% (178 of 922 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Faerie Conclave relevance 0.78 · 48.8% (450 of 922 decks)
- Treetop Village relevance 0.77 · 41.1% (379 of 922 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.57 · 48.8% (450 of 922 decks)
- Blinkmoth Nexus relevance 0.71 · 26.1% (241 of 922 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.60 · 40.9% (377 of 922 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.70 · 24.7% (228 of 922 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.63 · 31.8% (293 of 922 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.66 · 24.8% (229 of 922 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.64 · 24.0% (221 of 922 decks)
- Mishra's Factory relevance 0.67 · 14.4% (133 of 922 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.53 · 36.0% (332 of 922 decks)
- Mobilized District relevance 0.70 · 10.7% (99 of 922 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.48 · 39.6% (365 of 922 decks)
- Soulstone Sanctuary relevance 0.63 · 11.2% (103 of 922 decks)
- Mutavault relevance 0.57 · 15.5% (143 of 922 decks)
- Mishra's Foundry relevance 0.64 · 7.3% (67 of 922 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 0.59 · 9.2% (85 of 922 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.52 · 8.9% (82 of 922 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.50 · 9.9% (91 of 922 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.55 · 5.4% (50 of 922 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.37 · 12.8% (118 of 922 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.36 · 11.7% (108 of 922 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.38 · 8.4% (77 of 922 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.36 · 9.5% (88 of 922 decks)
- Dread Statuary relevance 0.53 · 3.0% (28 of 922 decks)
- Frostwalk Bastion relevance 0.53 · 2.7% (25 of 922 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.25 · 26.6% (245 of 922 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.33 · 6.7% (62 of 922 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.33 · 5.1% (47 of 922 decks)
- Pit of Offerings relevance 0.46 · 2.7% (25 of 922 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.29 · 10.2% (94 of 922 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.36 · 4.2% (39 of 922 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.23 · 16.2% (149 of 922 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 71.4% (658 of 922 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.38 · 3.3% (30 of 922 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.25 · 10.5% (97 of 922 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.26 · 8.2% (76 of 922 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.32 · 4.0% (37 of 922 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.23 · 12.3% (113 of 922 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.32 · 3.7% (34 of 922 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.28 · 4.2% (39 of 922 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (40 of 922 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.31 · 3.6% (33 of 922 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.20 · 14.0% (129 of 922 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.32 · 3.0% (28 of 922 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (26 of 922 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.20 · 10.2% (94 of 922 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.22 · 5.2% (48 of 922 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (35 of 922 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (26 of 922 decks)
All lands (50)
- Cascading Cataracts relevance 0.77 · 25.9% (239 of 922 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.57 · 53.9% (497 of 922 decks)
- Tanglepool Bridge relevance 0.51 · 55.2% (509 of 922 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.63 · 22.0% (203 of 922 decks)
- Sunken Citadel relevance 0.57 · 6.5% (60 of 922 decks)
- Valgavoth's Lair relevance 0.59 · 4.1% (38 of 922 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.44 · 4.6% (42 of 922 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.35 · 8.1% (75 of 922 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.35 · 7.8% (72 of 922 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.34 · 7.8% (72 of 922 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.33 · 7.6% (70 of 922 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.33 · 6.9% (64 of 922 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.39 · 4.0% (37 of 922 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.25 · 15.0% (138 of 922 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.22 · 21.8% (201 of 922 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (56 of 922 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (40 of 922 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.22 · 18.5% (171 of 922 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.21 · 18.7% (172 of 922 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.21 · 15.4% (142 of 922 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.25 · 8.6% (79 of 922 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.15 · 44.6% (411 of 922 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.21 · 13.1% (121 of 922 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (87 of 922 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.33 · 3.0% (28 of 922 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.22 · 8.2% (76 of 922 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.22 · 7.9% (73 of 922 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (27 of 922 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.23 · 5.2% (48 of 922 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.17 · 20.3% (187 of 922 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.22 · 5.9% (54 of 922 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.20 · 8.9% (82 of 922 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.23 · 4.4% (41 of 922 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.14 · 28.4% (262 of 922 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.12 · 37.4% (345 of 922 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.12 · 39.5% (364 of 922 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (24 of 922 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.17 · 8.4% (77 of 922 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.16 · 11.0% (101 of 922 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (31 of 922 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (37 of 922 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (33 of 922 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.13 · 22.3% (206 of 922 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.11 · 43.9% (405 of 922 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.12 · 28.2% (260 of 922 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (25 of 922 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.08 · 47.4% (437 of 922 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (26 of 922 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 70.5% (650 of 922 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 88.2% (813 of 922 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir, from 922 real Commander decks.