Cards like Smokebraider
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
46% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Smokebraider 57%
- Flamebraider 49%
- Chandra's Embercat 9%
Cards like Harrow
12× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Temur decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Harrow 46%
- Roiling Regrowth 31%
- Entish Restoration 26%
- Scapeshift 21%
- Planar Engineering 10%
- Cycle of Renewal 3%
Cards like Avenger of Zendikar
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Temur decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Creeping Trailblazer
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Mossborn Hydra
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Temur decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Mossborn Hydra 41%
- Undergrowth Champion 39%
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower 5%
- Vinelasher Kudzu 1%
- Scythecat Cub 1%
Other options: Seedship Agrarian, Foe-liage, Oran-Rief Hydra, Floral Evoker, Territorial Scythecat, Murasa Ranger, Sazh's Chocobo
Cards like Ancient Greenwarden
8.0× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Temur decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Rampant Growth
1.4× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 60% of other Temur decks
54% of decks run two or more
vs. 39% of other Temur decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 1.2 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Rampant Growth 46%
- Cultivate 45%
- Kodama's Reach 38%
- Explosive Vegetation 9%
- Shared Roots 8%
- Migration Path 6%
- Boundless Realms 6%
- Traverse the Outlands 4%
- Grow from the Ashes 3%
- Search for Tomorrow 3%
- Terramorph 1%
- Far Wanderings 1%
- Primal Growth 1%
- Verdant Mastery 1%
- Roamer's Routine 1%
- Harvest Season 1%
- Reshape the Earth 1%
Other options: Map the Frontier, Reach the Horizon, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, They Went This Way, Nissa's Expedition, Spring // Mind, Slimefoot's Survey, Deep Reconnaissance, Untamed Wilds, Map the Wastes, Celebrate the Harvest, Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
4.1× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Temur decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Temur decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Brushfire Elemental
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Brushfire Elemental 15%
- Akoum Hellhound 8%
- Grove Rumbler 8%
- Remnant Elemental 3%
- Valakut Predator 3%
- Wave-Wing Elemental 1%
Other options: Hedron Scrabbler, Hedron Rover, Canopy Baloth, Attercop, Makindi Sliderunner, Windrider Eel, Scythe Leopard, Icecave Crasher, Plated Geopede, Boughside Wanderers, Skyclave Geopede, Snapping Gnarlid, Territorial Baloth, Baloth Woodcrasher, Gladiolus Amicitia
Cards like Growth Spiral
4.8× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Temur decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Tatyova, Benthic Druid
4.7× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Temur decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Gandalf, Shadow's Foe
Cards like Exploration
5.6× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Temur decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
6.5× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Foundation Breaker
9.9× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Foundation Breaker 29%
- Ingot Chewer 13%
Other options: Rock Soldiers, Reclamation Sage, Keldon Vandals, Acidic Slime, Viridian Shaman, Wild Celebrants, Uktabi Orangutan, Vithian Renegades, Manic Vandal, Tin Street Hooligan, Myconid Spore Tender, Batterhorn, Conclave Naturalists, Oxidda Scrapmelter, Indrik Stomphowler
Cards like Thicket Crasher
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Thicket Crasher 57%
- Nova Chaser 5%
Cards like Ashaya, Soul of the Wild
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Flora Colossus, Harmonious Grovestrider, Allosaurus Rider, Mirkwood Pathmaker
Cards like Urban Evolution
6.7× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.1× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 39% of other Temur decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 23% of other Temur decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 38%
- Three Visits 25%
- Skyshroud Claim 20%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 4%
- Ranger's Path 1%
- Glimpse the Core 1%
Other options: Field Trip, Hunting Wilds
Cards like Scute Swarm
2.1× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Temur decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Lotus Cobra
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Temur decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Burgeoning
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
16% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.17 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Burgeoning 15%
- On the Trail 3%
Cards like Farseek
18× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 46% of other Temur decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.46 in other Temur decks
Cards like Embodiment of Spring
9.4× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Temur decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Krosan Wayfarer, Silkwing Scout, Diligent Farmhand, Oashra Cultivator, Dawntreader Elk
Cards like Mina and Denn, Wildborn
7.3× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Temur decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Temur decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.27 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.25 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.25 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Scampering Scorcher relevance 0.27 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.27 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.26 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.27 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.28 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Thunderkin Awakener relevance 0.28 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Living Twister relevance 0.26 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.26 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.25 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.27 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.23 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.23 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.25 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.26 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.24 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.28 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Tempt with Vengeance relevance 0.27 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.27 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Chandra, Novice Pyromancer relevance 0.27 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.26 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.25 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.24 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.24 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.23 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.24 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.19 · 48.8% (39 of 80 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.26 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.21 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.25 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.25 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Glacierwood Siege relevance 0.28 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.27 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.26 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.24 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Parcelbeast relevance 0.25 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.21 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Elemental Mastery relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.24 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.19 · 46.3% (37 of 80 decks)
- Embodiment of Spring relevance 0.23 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Escape to the Wilds relevance 0.26 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.26 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.26 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Chandra, Awakened Inferno relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.25 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Scampering Scorcher relevance 0.27 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Thunderkin Awakener relevance 0.28 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Living Twister relevance 0.26 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.26 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.23 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.25 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.24 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.24 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.24 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.23 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.19 · 48.8% (39 of 80 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.21 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.25 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Parcelbeast relevance 0.25 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.24 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Embodiment of Spring relevance 0.23 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.23 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Rubblehulk relevance 0.24 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Undergrowth Champion relevance 0.20 · 38.8% (31 of 80 decks)
- Animar, Soul of Elements relevance 0.20 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Cavalier of Flame relevance 0.24 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Vibrance relevance 0.22 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.25 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Creeping Trailblazer relevance 0.19 · 41.3% (33 of 80 decks)
- Geode Rager relevance 0.21 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.24 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Cavalier of Thorns relevance 0.23 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 0.27 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 0.20 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.18 · 41.3% (33 of 80 decks)
- Bramble Familiar // Fetch Quest relevance 0.24 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Greenwarden of Murasa relevance 0.22 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.18 · 41.3% (33 of 80 decks)
- Subterfuge relevance 0.23 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Zendikar Incarnate relevance 0.26 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Brushfire Elemental relevance 0.23 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Wistfulness relevance 0.21 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Brighthearth Banneret relevance 0.20 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.27 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.27 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Cloudkin Seer relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Overgrowth Elemental relevance 0.21 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Endurance relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.22 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Ashling, Rekindled // Ashling, Rimebound relevance 0.20 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.22 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Akoum Hellhound relevance 0.26 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
All artifacts (40)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.27 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.28 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.24 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.27 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Gathering Stone relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.24 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.21 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.21 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Icon of Ancestry relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Dawn-Blessed Pennant relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Chronicle of Victory relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.14 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.11 · 43.8% (35 of 80 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Vanquisher's Banner relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Khalni Gem relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Sword of Hearth and Home relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Coat of Arms relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Urza's Incubator relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Door of Destinies relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Talisman of Creativity relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Exploration relevance 0.25 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.26 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.27 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.26 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.26 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Glacierwood Siege relevance 0.28 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.26 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Elemental Mastery relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.27 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Collective Inferno relevance 0.24 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Shared Animosity relevance 0.27 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.25 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.19 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Frostcliff Siege relevance 0.25 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.14 · 61.3% (49 of 80 decks)
- Song of Creation relevance 0.26 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Trade Routes relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.21 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.22 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Temur Ascendancy relevance 0.17 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.22 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Dragonback Assault relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.17 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.21 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Mana Flare relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Nissa's Zendikon relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Warstorm Surge relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Eyes of the Wisent relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Cryoshatter relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- On the Trail relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
All instants (50)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.25 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.23 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.26 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.25 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Planar Genesis relevance 0.24 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.19 · 46.3% (37 of 80 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.26 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Temur Charm relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.28 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.24 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.19 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.15 · 61.3% (49 of 80 decks)
- Ashling's Command relevance 0.18 · 38.8% (31 of 80 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.21 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.25 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.25 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.19 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.24 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.26 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Joint Exploration relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.23 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.19 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.20 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Struggle // Survive relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.23 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Atarka's Command relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Kindred Summons relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.21 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Embrace the Paradox relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Destructive Revelry relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Tragic Lesson relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Deprive relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.27 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.27 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.28 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Tempt with Vengeance relevance 0.27 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Decimate relevance 0.27 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.25 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.21 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 0.26 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Escape to the Wilds relevance 0.26 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Kindle the Inner Flame relevance 0.23 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.25 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.23 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.27 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.22 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.19 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Chandra's Ignition relevance 0.27 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.27 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.25 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Hull Breach relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Genesis Ultimatum relevance 0.19 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Blasphemous Act relevance 0.17 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.16 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.17 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.14 · 46.3% (37 of 80 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Elemental Spectacle relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.23 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Vandalblast relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.13 · 45.0% (36 of 80 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Brave the Wilds relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Guided Passage relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Soul Immolation relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Mizzium Mortars relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Mythos of Illuna relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (12)
- Chandra, Novice Pyromancer relevance 0.27 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.27 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Chandra, Awakened Inferno relevance 0.26 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.25 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Chandra, Flamecaller relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Chandra, Acolyte of Flame relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Wrenn and Six relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
All battles (2)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.23 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Invasion of Karsus // Refraction Elemental relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Sheltered Thicket relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.26 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.22 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Argoth, Sanctum of Nature relevance 0.28 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.24 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.24 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Flamekin Village relevance 0.20 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.25 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.20 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.23 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.27 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.19 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.23 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Kessig Wolf Run relevance 0.25 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Bountiful Landscape relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (40 of 80 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.24 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.23 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.23 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Ketria Triome relevance 0.15 · 45.0% (36 of 80 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.23 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Thundering Falls relevance 0.24 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Raging Ravine relevance 0.20 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Temple of Epiphany relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Restless Spire relevance 0.21 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.21 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Wandering Fumarole relevance 0.21 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.12 · 53.8% (43 of 80 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.18 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
All lands (50)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.25 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.27 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.27 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.27 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Highland Forest relevance 0.28 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Wooded Ridgeline relevance 0.28 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.22 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.17 · 45.0% (36 of 80 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.25 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.19 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.26 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.21 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.26 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.16 · 52.5% (42 of 80 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.18 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.20 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.23 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.20 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.17 · 41.3% (33 of 80 decks)
- Mountain Valley relevance 0.26 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Primal Beyond relevance 0.21 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.16 · 47.5% (38 of 80 decks)
- Cinder Glade relevance 0.15 · 47.5% (38 of 80 decks)
- Unclaimed Territory relevance 0.22 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.22 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.23 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Mossfire Valley relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Rockfall Vale relevance 0.19 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.20 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.20 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.24 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.23 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.24 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.23 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Steam Vents relevance 0.16 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.18 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.12 · 61.3% (49 of 80 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.24 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Rootbound Crag relevance 0.17 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.17 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Stomping Ground relevance 0.14 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Game Trail relevance 0.22 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Cragcrown Pathway // Timbercrown Pathway relevance 0.22 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Frostboil Snarl relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Omnath, Locus of the Roil, from 80 real Commander decks.