Cards like Hardened Scales
7.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other green decks
50% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Mossborn Hydra
5.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
49% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other green decks
Cards
- Mossborn Hydra 66%
- Scythecat Cub 36%
- Sazh's Chocobo 19%
- Oran-Rief Hydra 10%
- Undergrowth Champion 6%
- Territorial Scythecat 4%
- Seedship Agrarian 4%
- Vinelasher Kudzu 2%
- Floral Evoker 2%
Other options: Foe-liage, Murasa Ranger
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
3.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.42 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Entish Restoration
3.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other green decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.55 in other green decks
Cards
- Entish Restoration 40%
- Harrow 39%
- Planar Engineering 17%
- Scapeshift 14%
- Roiling Regrowth 13%
- Cycle of Renewal 9%
Cards like Kami of Whispered Hopes
7.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other green decks
Cards
- Kami of Whispered Hopes 56%
- Gyre Sage 31%
- Incubation Druid 15%
Cards like The Earth Crystal
7.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Ancient Greenwarden
3.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other green decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
8.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other green decks
Cards like Cultivate
1.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
77% of decks run one or more
vs. 61% of other green decks
60% of decks run two or more
vs. 44% of other green decks
1.9 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 59%
- Kodama's Reach 47%
- Rampant Growth 41%
- Shared Roots 9%
- Map the Frontier 6%
- Explosive Vegetation 6%
- Migration Path 5%
- Grow from the Ashes 4%
- Roamer's Routine 2%
- Search for Tomorrow 2%
- Reach the Horizon 2%
- New Generation's Technique 2%
- Far Wanderings 1%
- They Went This Way 1%
- Viewpoint Synchronization 1%
Other options: Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Map the Wastes, Deep Reconnaissance, Peregrination, Primal Growth, Verdant Mastery, Path to the Festival, Untamed Wilds
Cards like Scute Swarm
3.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other green decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.70 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other green decks
Cards
- Scute Swarm 52%
- Springheart Nantuko 18%
Cards like Duskshell Crawler
9.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Crowned Ceratok, Trollbred Guardian, Baloth Pup
Cards like Nature's Lore
1.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 29% of other green decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Ranger's Path, Field Trip, Hunting Wilds
Cards like Tifa Lockhart
10× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Terrasymbiosis
6.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
2.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Evolution Witness
19× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Exploration
2.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other green decks
Cards like Traverse the Outlands
2.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other green decks
Cards
- Traverse the Outlands 19%
- Reshape the Earth 3%
- Boundless Realms 3%
- Harvest Season 2%
- Celebrate the Harvest 1%
Other options: Nissa's Expedition, New Frontiers, Turtle Tracks, Slimefoot's Survey
Cards like Ride the Shoopuf
4.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other green decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.56 · 56.3% (2,414 of 4,288 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.56 · 47.2% (2,025 of 4,288 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 0.65 · 28.8% (1,234 of 4,288 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.47 · 60.0% (2,571 of 4,288 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.73 · 14.9% (641 of 4,288 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.43 · 65.8% (2,823 of 4,288 decks)
- Scythecat Cub relevance 0.59 · 35.8% (1,537 of 4,288 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.65 · 25.0% (1,070 of 4,288 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.53 · 43.7% (1,872 of 4,288 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.42 · 66.0% (2,832 of 4,288 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.54 · 41.0% (1,758 of 4,288 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.59 · 28.6% (1,227 of 4,288 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.48 · 48.6% (2,082 of 4,288 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.54 · 37.4% (1,604 of 4,288 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.63 · 21.4% (918 of 4,288 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.45 · 52.1% (2,235 of 4,288 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.53 · 34.9% (1,495 of 4,288 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.52 · 33.5% (1,438 of 4,288 decks)
- Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider relevance 0.56 · 25.9% (1,109 of 4,288 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.53 · 30.9% (1,324 of 4,288 decks)
- Ornery Tumblewagg relevance 0.73 · 8.2% (352 of 4,288 decks)
- Railway Brawler relevance 0.57 · 22.4% (960 of 4,288 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.46 · 41.4% (1,776 of 4,288 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.42 · 51.6% (2,211 of 4,288 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 0.55 · 22.6% (968 of 4,288 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.41 · 52.1% (2,234 of 4,288 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 0.69 · 8.2% (352 of 4,288 decks)
- Basking Broodscale relevance 0.72 · 6.0% (256 of 4,288 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.56 · 19.1% (818 of 4,288 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.45 · 37.4% (1,602 of 4,288 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.85 · 4.0% (171 of 4,288 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.53 · 20.7% (889 of 4,288 decks)
- Drix Fatemaker relevance 0.69 · 6.6% (282 of 4,288 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.39 · 51.1% (2,193 of 4,288 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.57 · 14.2% (607 of 4,288 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.60 · 12.4% (530 of 4,288 decks)
- Michelangelo, Weirdness to 11 relevance 0.66 · 7.9% (338 of 4,288 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 0.61 · 10.5% (450 of 4,288 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.50 · 24.0% (1,031 of 4,288 decks)
- Undergrowth Champion relevance 0.67 · 6.4% (274 of 4,288 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.56 · 14.0% (599 of 4,288 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.60 · 10.4% (445 of 4,288 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.52 · 18.8% (805 of 4,288 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.46 · 29.1% (1,246 of 4,288 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.44 · 33.6% (1,441 of 4,288 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.41 · 41.2% (1,765 of 4,288 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.52 · 16.9% (726 of 4,288 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.40 · 41.3% (1,771 of 4,288 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.46 · 27.1% (1,160 of 4,288 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.51 · 16.6% (713 of 4,288 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.56 · 56.3% (2,414 of 4,288 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.56 · 47.2% (2,025 of 4,288 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 0.65 · 28.8% (1,234 of 4,288 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.73 · 14.9% (641 of 4,288 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.43 · 65.8% (2,823 of 4,288 decks)
- Scythecat Cub relevance 0.59 · 35.8% (1,537 of 4,288 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.65 · 25.0% (1,070 of 4,288 decks)
- Ouroboroid relevance 0.53 · 43.7% (1,872 of 4,288 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.59 · 28.6% (1,227 of 4,288 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.54 · 37.4% (1,604 of 4,288 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.45 · 52.1% (2,235 of 4,288 decks)
- Vorinclex, Monstrous Raider relevance 0.56 · 25.9% (1,109 of 4,288 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.53 · 30.9% (1,324 of 4,288 decks)
- Ornery Tumblewagg relevance 0.73 · 8.2% (352 of 4,288 decks)
- Railway Brawler relevance 0.57 · 22.4% (960 of 4,288 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.46 · 41.4% (1,776 of 4,288 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 0.55 · 22.6% (968 of 4,288 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.41 · 52.1% (2,234 of 4,288 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 0.69 · 8.2% (352 of 4,288 decks)
- Basking Broodscale relevance 0.72 · 6.0% (256 of 4,288 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.56 · 19.1% (818 of 4,288 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.45 · 37.4% (1,602 of 4,288 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.85 · 4.0% (171 of 4,288 decks)
- Drix Fatemaker relevance 0.69 · 6.6% (282 of 4,288 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.39 · 51.1% (2,193 of 4,288 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.57 · 14.2% (607 of 4,288 decks)
- Michelangelo, Weirdness to 11 relevance 0.66 · 7.9% (338 of 4,288 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 0.61 · 10.5% (450 of 4,288 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.50 · 24.0% (1,031 of 4,288 decks)
- Undergrowth Champion relevance 0.67 · 6.4% (274 of 4,288 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.46 · 29.1% (1,246 of 4,288 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.44 · 33.6% (1,441 of 4,288 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.41 · 41.2% (1,765 of 4,288 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.46 · 27.1% (1,160 of 4,288 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.52 · 14.6% (627 of 4,288 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.38 · 45.0% (1,928 of 4,288 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.43 · 30.9% (1,327 of 4,288 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.50 · 14.9% (637 of 4,288 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.61 · 6.1% (260 of 4,288 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.45 · 23.7% (1,017 of 4,288 decks)
- Walking Ballista relevance 0.52 · 12.3% (529 of 4,288 decks)
- Sazh Katzroy relevance 0.60 · 6.2% (266 of 4,288 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.50 · 14.0% (602 of 4,288 decks)
- Oran-Rief Hydra relevance 0.54 · 10.4% (444 of 4,288 decks)
- Benevolent Hydra relevance 0.57 · 8.4% (361 of 4,288 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.47 · 16.7% (715 of 4,288 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.39 · 35.8% (1,533 of 4,288 decks)
- Eumidian Terrabotanist relevance 0.65 · 4.6% (196 of 4,288 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 0.66 · 4.4% (188 of 4,288 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.48 · 14.5% (623 of 4,288 decks)
All artifacts (38)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.54 · 41.0% (1,758 of 4,288 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.53 · 34.9% (1,495 of 4,288 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.51 · 16.6% (713 of 4,288 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.37 · 48.5% (2,078 of 4,288 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.47 · 20.3% (869 of 4,288 decks)
- Power Fist relevance 0.53 · 9.1% (391 of 4,288 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.47 · 11.3% (486 of 4,288 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.49 · 8.5% (363 of 4,288 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.52 · 4.2% (179 of 4,288 decks)
- Necklace of Girion relevance 0.45 · 5.9% (253 of 4,288 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.63 · 3.1% (131 of 4,288 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.40 · 9.3% (397 of 4,288 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.29 · 33.6% (1,439 of 4,288 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.42 · 5.8% (247 of 4,288 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.40 · 5.8% (248 of 4,288 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.40 · 4.9% (210 of 4,288 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.56 · 2.7% (115 of 4,288 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.48 · 3.6% (155 of 4,288 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.43 · 4.3% (183 of 4,288 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.40 · 4.5% (193 of 4,288 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.25 · 25.2% (1,079 of 4,288 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.48 · 2.9% (126 of 4,288 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.23 · 29.6% (1,268 of 4,288 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.46 · 2.9% (126 of 4,288 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.44 · 3.1% (134 of 4,288 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.43 · 3.3% (140 of 4,288 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.37 · 4.1% (177 of 4,288 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.36 · 4.2% (179 of 4,288 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.25 · 15.3% (654 of 4,288 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.43 · 3.0% (128 of 4,288 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.41 · 3.0% (127 of 4,288 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.18 · 36.2% (1,553 of 4,288 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.41 · 2.6% (111 of 4,288 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.40 · 2.6% (110 of 4,288 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.37 · 3.0% (129 of 4,288 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.38 · 2.8% (118 of 4,288 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.08 · 66.0% (2,829 of 4,288 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (108 of 4,288 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.47 · 60.0% (2,571 of 4,288 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.42 · 66.0% (2,832 of 4,288 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.48 · 48.6% (2,082 of 4,288 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.63 · 21.4% (918 of 4,288 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.52 · 33.5% (1,438 of 4,288 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.53 · 20.7% (889 of 4,288 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.60 · 12.4% (530 of 4,288 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.56 · 14.0% (599 of 4,288 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.60 · 10.4% (445 of 4,288 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.52 · 16.9% (726 of 4,288 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.40 · 41.3% (1,771 of 4,288 decks)
- Roaring Earth relevance 0.57 · 9.0% (386 of 4,288 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.55 · 10.3% (441 of 4,288 decks)
- High Score relevance 0.59 · 5.9% (255 of 4,288 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.51 · 11.9% (511 of 4,288 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.52 · 9.4% (402 of 4,288 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.36 · 35.7% (1,532 of 4,288 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.45 · 14.7% (631 of 4,288 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.47 · 12.5% (534 of 4,288 decks)
- Primal Vigor relevance 0.50 · 8.3% (356 of 4,288 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.50 · 8.5% (364 of 4,288 decks)
- Level Up relevance 0.51 · 5.9% (252 of 4,288 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.63 · 3.8% (162 of 4,288 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.54 · 4.5% (192 of 4,288 decks)
- Beorn's Hospitality relevance 0.48 · 5.0% (213 of 4,288 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.45 · 6.8% (291 of 4,288 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.33 · 27.3% (1,170 of 4,288 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.43 · 7.5% (323 of 4,288 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.51 · 3.9% (167 of 4,288 decks)
- Ordeal of Nylea relevance 0.52 · 3.7% (158 of 4,288 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.48 · 4.2% (182 of 4,288 decks)
- Dancing from Dark to Dawn relevance 0.41 · 5.4% (230 of 4,288 decks)
- Claim the Kingdom relevance 0.57 · 3.0% (128 of 4,288 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.41 · 4.9% (209 of 4,288 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.50 · 3.7% (159 of 4,288 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.40 · 4.9% (212 of 4,288 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.43 · 4.4% (189 of 4,288 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.30 · 15.3% (654 of 4,288 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.31 · 13.4% (576 of 4,288 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.36 · 7.1% (306 of 4,288 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.35 · 7.8% (334 of 4,288 decks)
- Nature's Will relevance 0.52 · 2.9% (126 of 4,288 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.50 · 3.2% (137 of 4,288 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.35 · 6.8% (292 of 4,288 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.44 · 3.9% (167 of 4,288 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.33 · 8.9% (381 of 4,288 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.36 · 4.9% (212 of 4,288 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.19 · 51.7% (2,217 of 4,288 decks)
- Primal Rage relevance 0.52 · 2.6% (110 of 4,288 decks)
- Thickest in the Thicket relevance 0.43 · 3.3% (141 of 4,288 decks)
All instants (49)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.42 · 51.6% (2,211 of 4,288 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.36 · 40.0% (1,716 of 4,288 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.35 · 38.9% (1,669 of 4,288 decks)
- Invigorating Surge relevance 0.55 · 5.6% (240 of 4,288 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 0.52 · 6.6% (281 of 4,288 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.44 · 12.6% (541 of 4,288 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.46 · 9.2% (394 of 4,288 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.49 · 6.4% (273 of 4,288 decks)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.55 · 4.3% (183 of 4,288 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 0.55 · 4.2% (180 of 4,288 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.32 · 31.9% (1,368 of 4,288 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.40 · 12.4% (530 of 4,288 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.50 · 4.7% (203 of 4,288 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.43 · 8.7% (371 of 4,288 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.30 · 35.6% (1,527 of 4,288 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.43 · 7.5% (322 of 4,288 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.36 · 13.4% (574 of 4,288 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.44 · 5.3% (228 of 4,288 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.31 · 24.8% (1,065 of 4,288 decks)
- Signature Slam relevance 0.62 · 2.7% (116 of 4,288 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.45 · 4.6% (198 of 4,288 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.45 · 4.3% (185 of 4,288 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.27 · 31.2% (1,339 of 4,288 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.39 · 6.4% (273 of 4,288 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.39 · 5.2% (225 of 4,288 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.38 · 6.3% (272 of 4,288 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.34 · 9.7% (414 of 4,288 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.32 · 11.5% (494 of 4,288 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.32 · 11.3% (483 of 4,288 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.30 · 13.9% (598 of 4,288 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.36 · 5.3% (227 of 4,288 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.29 · 15.1% (646 of 4,288 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.49 · 3.0% (130 of 4,288 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.28 · 18.0% (773 of 4,288 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.33 · 6.8% (291 of 4,288 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.27 · 15.2% (651 of 4,288 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.41 · 3.8% (165 of 4,288 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.31 · 7.9% (340 of 4,288 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.37 · 4.1% (176 of 4,288 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (263 of 4,288 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.32 · 5.0% (214 of 4,288 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.43 · 3.0% (129 of 4,288 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.39 · 3.4% (145 of 4,288 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.16 · 53.1% (2,278 of 4,288 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 0.37 · 3.6% (153 of 4,288 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.20 · 26.2% (1,122 of 4,288 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.40 · 2.8% (121 of 4,288 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.37 · 2.5% (109 of 4,288 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.13 · 48.0% (2,059 of 4,288 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.52 · 18.8% (805 of 4,288 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.64 · 6.2% (264 of 4,288 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.50 · 16.9% (723 of 4,288 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.55 · 8.0% (341 of 4,288 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.47 · 13.7% (586 of 4,288 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.52 · 9.0% (384 of 4,288 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.42 · 19.1% (820 of 4,288 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.67 · 3.7% (160 of 4,288 decks)
- Through the Forest Gate relevance 0.54 · 4.7% (203 of 4,288 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (334 of 4,288 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.54 · 4.5% (191 of 4,288 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.40 · 13.7% (588 of 4,288 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.51 · 4.9% (209 of 4,288 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.55 · 4.2% (180 of 4,288 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.47 · 5.3% (229 of 4,288 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.43 · 8.3% (354 of 4,288 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.33 · 25.2% (1,081 of 4,288 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.46 · 5.0% (213 of 4,288 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.44 · 6.0% (258 of 4,288 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.41 · 9.0% (385 of 4,288 decks)
- Chocobo Kick relevance 0.54 · 3.8% (163 of 4,288 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.44 · 5.7% (246 of 4,288 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.31 · 26.6% (1,142 of 4,288 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.57 · 3.3% (143 of 4,288 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.36 · 11.3% (485 of 4,288 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.47 · 4.2% (180 of 4,288 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.23 · 46.9% (2,013 of 4,288 decks)
- Pull Through the Weft relevance 0.59 · 2.6% (111 of 4,288 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.38 · 7.0% (300 of 4,288 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.37 · 7.4% (316 of 4,288 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.31 · 14.8% (634 of 4,288 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 0.58 · 2.5% (108 of 4,288 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.25 · 35.6% (1,528 of 4,288 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.49 · 3.5% (148 of 4,288 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.30 · 15.1% (649 of 4,288 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.40 · 4.7% (201 of 4,288 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.43 · 4.1% (175 of 4,288 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.49 · 3.2% (136 of 4,288 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.33 · 8.4% (360 of 4,288 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.21 · 45.1% (1,934 of 4,288 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.49 · 2.9% (124 of 4,288 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.29 · 12.8% (548 of 4,288 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.50 · 2.8% (122 of 4,288 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.34 · 5.7% (246 of 4,288 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.43 · 3.6% (153 of 4,288 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.24 · 26.3% (1,126 of 4,288 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.26 · 16.1% (690 of 4,288 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.20 · 41.4% (1,777 of 4,288 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.16 · 58.8% (2,523 of 4,288 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.44 · 3.0% (130 of 4,288 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.38 · 23.7% (1,016 of 4,288 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.46 · 4.4% (188 of 4,288 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.48 · 4.0% (170 of 4,288 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.57 · 2.7% (117 of 4,288 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.44 · 4.1% (177 of 4,288 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (132 of 4,288 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.38 · 3.3% (140 of 4,288 decks)
All utility lands (41)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.50 · 17.8% (765 of 4,288 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.45 · 14.8% (636 of 4,288 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.43 · 12.7% (546 of 4,288 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.41 · 15.4% (662 of 4,288 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.32 · 37.9% (1,624 of 4,288 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.49 · 5.8% (248 of 4,288 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.50 · 4.6% (196 of 4,288 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.58 · 3.6% (156 of 4,288 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.45 · 6.2% (265 of 4,288 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.42 · 7.6% (328 of 4,288 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.44 · 5.5% (236 of 4,288 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.58 · 3.2% (137 of 4,288 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.32 · 20.5% (878 of 4,288 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.53 · 3.5% (148 of 4,288 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.34 · 13.8% (592 of 4,288 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.40 · 5.8% (250 of 4,288 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.32 · 10.3% (441 of 4,288 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.49 · 3.1% (131 of 4,288 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.25 · 26.0% (1,113 of 4,288 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.27 · 20.5% (881 of 4,288 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.24 · 27.5% (1,181 of 4,288 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.25 · 23.0% (987 of 4,288 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.31 · 8.5% (365 of 4,288 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.21 · 37.0% (1,587 of 4,288 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.37 · 4.3% (183 of 4,288 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.48 · 2.6% (113 of 4,288 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.43 · 3.3% (140 of 4,288 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.39 · 3.8% (161 of 4,288 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.28 · 10.7% (457 of 4,288 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.43 · 3.1% (135 of 4,288 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.33 · 4.7% (200 of 4,288 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.23 · 19.8% (849 of 4,288 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.45 · 2.6% (112 of 4,288 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.27 · 8.9% (382 of 4,288 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.34 · 4.2% (178 of 4,288 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.33 · 4.4% (187 of 4,288 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.40 · 3.0% (129 of 4,288 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.38 · 2.9% (123 of 4,288 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.37 · 2.9% (124 of 4,288 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.36 · 2.6% (111 of 4,288 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.33 · 2.9% (125 of 4,288 decks)
All lands (27)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.41 · 53.3% (2,287 of 4,288 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.39 · 59.0% (2,530 of 4,288 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.52 · 21.8% (933 of 4,288 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.51 · 24.0% (1,028 of 4,288 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.55 · 16.1% (690 of 4,288 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.51 · 22.5% (965 of 4,288 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.39 · 48.2% (2,066 of 4,288 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.62 · 7.3% (312 of 4,288 decks)
- Promising Vein relevance 0.62 · 6.6% (284 of 4,288 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.47 · 18.4% (791 of 4,288 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.42 · 25.0% (1,071 of 4,288 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.43 · 23.1% (989 of 4,288 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.43 · 20.1% (860 of 4,288 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.42 · 20.3% (871 of 4,288 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.52 · 5.9% (254 of 4,288 decks)
- Jungle Basin relevance 0.53 · 5.2% (221 of 4,288 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.42 · 9.1% (389 of 4,288 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.34 · 14.2% (611 of 4,288 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.42 · 5.0% (216 of 4,288 decks)
- Hobbit Hole relevance 0.57 · 2.9% (125 of 4,288 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.38 · 6.4% (276 of 4,288 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.35 · 9.5% (407 of 4,288 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.26 · 20.6% (885 of 4,288 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.34 · 5.0% (215 of 4,288 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.31 · 6.3% (272 of 4,288 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.36 · 4.0% (172 of 4,288 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 93.9% (4,027 of 4,288 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Bristly Bill, Spine Sower, from 4,288 real Commander decks.